The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression
Open accessAbstract
Growing concern over traffic safety has led to research into prediction of freeway crashes in an advanced traffic management and information systems environment. A crash likelihood prediction model was developed by using real-time traffic flow variables (measured through a series of underground sensors) potentially associated with crash occurrence. The issues related to real-time application, including range of stations and time slice duration to be examined, were also addressed. The methodology used, matched case-control logistic regression, was adopted from epidemiological studies in which every crash is a case and corresponding noncrashes act as controls. The 5-min average occupancy observed at the upstream station during the 5 to 10 min before the crash, along with the 5-min coefficient of variation in speed at the downstream station during the same time, was found to affect crash occurrence most significantly and hence was used to calculate the corresponding log-odds ratio. A threshold value for this ratio may then be set to determine whether the location must be flagged as a potential crash location. It was shown that by using 1.0 as the threshold for the log-odds ratio, more than 69% crash identification was achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Real-time crash risk prediction on arterials based on LSTM-CNN
Li, P., Abdel-Aty, M., & Yuan, J. (2020) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105371 · Cited by 394
Self-citationUtilizing support vector machine in real-time crash risk evaluation
Yu, R., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2013) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.027 · Cited by 317
Self-citationArtificial intelligence techniques for driving safety and vehicle crash prediction
Halim, Z., Kalsoom, R., Bashir, S., & Abbas, G. (2016) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-016-9467-9 · Cited by 110
Dynamic driving environment complexity quantification method and its verification
Yu, R., Zheng, Y., & Qu, X. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103051 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdel-Aty, M., Uddin, N., Pande, A., Abdalla, M. F., & Hsia, L.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 1897
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-95
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2067022269
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/1897-12
- The paper
- Abdel-Aty, M., Uddin, N., Pande, A., Abdalla, M. F., & Hsia, L. (2004). Predicting Freeway Crashes from Loop Detector Data by Matched Case-Control Logistic Regression. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/1897-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.