The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Passenger Choice Models for Analysis of Impacts of Real-Time Bus Information on Crowdedness
Abstract
This research explores the effect of bus occupancy information on transit users’ choice of a bus by use of a binary logit model. The model predicts the probability of bus choice between the first arriving bus and the second arriving bus. The analysis is based on interview survey data obtained over 1 week (June 19 to June 25, 2008) in the Seoul metropolitan area in South Korea. The data reveal that the need for public transportation information varies by user group (white- or blue-collar workers, students, homemakers, self-employed workers, and older people) and the stage of the trip (before a trip, at a stop, on board, and at a transfer point). The results show that the availability of seats will increase the probability that a bus user will choose to board an arriving bus, with all other things being kept constant, whereas the travel time on board and the crowded-ness on a bus decrease the probability that a public transit user will choose to board an arriving bus. The effects of bus occupancy information are also different among user groups (white- or blue-collar workers, students, homemakers, self-employed workers, and older people) and trip purpose (commute and noncommute).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Access to crowding information concerning the next PT trips (departures) at a stop can induce a specific decision pattern among passengers, namely the willingness to wait (WTW) to reduce (or avoid) on-board overcrowding experience—i.e., by skipping the first (overcrowded) trip and waiting at the stop to board a second, less-crowded trip later.”
From Mitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information (2023) · cites this paper as Kim et al. 2009
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 2007, A Study on the TAGO Plan and Maintenance.
- 10.1016/j.trc.2006.05.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00012-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00042-5 · DOI
- Lyons G., 2005, Transportation Research A, 39, 257
- 10.3141/1791-13 · DOI
- 10.3141/1791-14 · DOI
- Shelton D., 2004, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1887, 92
- 10.3141/1927-23 · DOI
- Dziekan K., 2007, Transportation Research A, 41, 489
- 10.3141/2072-03 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.07.001 · DOI
- 10.3141/1799-08 · DOI
- 10.3141/1835-01 · DOI
- Seoul Metropolitan Government,, Seoul, South Korea.
- McFadden D., 1981, Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications
- Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis.
- Greene W., 2003, Econometric Analysis
- 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00135-5 · DOI
- CoxD. R. Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses. Proc., Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif. 1961.
- Cox D. R., 1962, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 24, 406, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1962.tb00468.x · DOI
Cited by
Tirachini, A., Hensher, D. A., & Rose, J. M. (2013) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.06.005 · Cited by 385
Mitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information
Drabicki, A., Kucharski, R., & Cats, O. (2023) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-022-10270-3 · Cited by 30
Drabicki, A., Cats, O., & Kucharski, R. (2021) · 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) · doi:10.1109/mt-its49943.2021.9529310 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J.-K., Lee, B., & Oh, S.
- Affiliations
- Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Backjin
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 2112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-126
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2134691762
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Keywords
- bus occupancy, crowding, passenger choice, binary logit model, user groups, Seoul
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review