Cited by 71Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport and Accessibility

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Driving Factors behind Successful Carpool Formation and Use

Buliung, Ron N., Soltys, Kalina, Habel, Catherine, Lanyon, Ryan·2009·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

Sustainable transportation options are receiving increasing attention in cities across North America because of rising commute times, fluctuating fuel prices, and increased awareness of the environmental impacts of transportation choices. Carpooling represents one of many possible alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle use for work or school trips. Recent attempts to encourage carpool formation in Canada include web-based applications that facilitate connections between potential carpoolers. One such example is Carpool Zone, a service provided by Smart Commute in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area. The service is coordinated regionally by the Smart Commute Team at Metrolinx (the regional transportation planning authority) and is free and open to the public. Data are used from Smart Commute to investigate the carpool formation and use process. Results from a logistic regression analysis of carpool use suggest that spatial accessibility to matches, household auto ownership, and sociodemographics influence carpooling more than do proximity to carpool infrastructure and personal attitudes (e.g., concern for the environment, cost). With respect to policy and planning, results suggest that increasing shared knowledge about commuting patterns at the home end of work trips could yield beneficial returns to the carpool formation and use process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2118-05

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 2006, The Cost of Urban Congestion in Canada.
  2. Texas Transportation Institute, 2007, The Urban Mobility Report
  3. 2008, Transportation Demand Management.
  4. Pisarski A. E., 2006, TR News, 26
  5. 2003, 2001 Census: Analysis Series. Where Canadians Work and How They Get There.
  6. Turcotte M., 2006, The Time It Takes to Get to Work and Back.
  7. 2008, Commuting Patterns and Places of Work of Canadians, 2006 Census.
  8. 10.1007/s001680050126 · DOI
  9. GarrisonW. Increasing the Flexibility of Legacy Systems. Proc., 2007 Anderson Lecture , 2007. http://agsg.binghamton.edu/garrison2007.pdf.
  10. 10.1016/0191-2607(79)90066-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11116-005-5711-x · DOI
  12. Meyer M., 1999, Transportation Research, Part A, 33, 575
  13. 10.1080/01944369208975811 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00250.x · DOI
  15. 10.1080/01944360608976750 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0967-070X(97)00019-X · DOI
  17. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1994)120:1(28) · DOI
  18. KaufmanS. Why People (Don't) Carpool and Change for the Better: A Social Capital Framework for Investigating Environmental Behavior. Presented at Second National Conference of Sustainable Campuses, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2002.
  19. Ferguson E., 1995, Transportation Research Record 1496, 142
  20. 10.1007/s11116-006-9101-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF02125335 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0191-2607(87)90014-8 · DOI
  23. OzanneL., and MollenkopfD. Understanding Consumer Intentions to Carpool: A Test of Alternative Models. Proc., 1999 Annual Meeting of Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy. www.smib.vuw.ac.nz:8081/www/ANZMAC1999/Site/O/Ozanne.pdf. Accessed June 2009.
  24. Horowitz A. D., 1978, Transportation Research Record 637, 1
  25. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01093.x · DOI
  26. Tsao H. S., 1999, Spatial and Temporal Factors in Estimating the Potential of Ride-Sharing for Demand Reduction.
  27. 10.1016/0191-2607(88)90033-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF02125334 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/1468-2427.00318 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00047-8 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00477.x · DOI
  32. 10.1080/01944360708977979 · DOI
  33. 10.1023/A:1004928012320 · DOI
  34. 10.1023/A:1004982709482 · DOI
  35. Winn J. R., 2005, An Analysis of Casual Carpool Passenger Behavior in Houston, Texas.
  36. 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00186-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buliung, R. N., Soltys, K., Habel, C., & Lanyon, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Metrolinx, 20 Bay Street, Suite 901, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2N8, Canada.
Corresponding author
Buliung, Ron N.
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2009-01
Volume
2118
Issue
1
Pages
31-38
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2026191820
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
carpooling, ride-sharing, sustainable transport, spatial accessibility, sociodemographic factors, commuting patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review