Cited by 10Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTransport Systems and TechnologyTransportation Planning and Optimization

Use of Support Vector Machines to Assign Short-Term Counts to Seasonal Adjustment Factor Groups

Tsapakis, Ioannis, Schneider, William H.·2015·Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Abstract

The traditional method of estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) involves several steps, with the most critical being the assignment process that involves allocating short-term counts to groups of seasonal adjustment factors (SAFs). The accuracy of AADT estimates highly depends on the assignment step, which is subject to errors stemming from human judgment. Support vector machines (SVMs), a supervised learning and statistical method, are employed to construct a series of assignment models that are compared with the traditional method and discriminant analysis (DA) models. Traffic volume data obtained from permanent traffic recorders are used to train and validate the models. The analysis is conducted with SAFs calculated for each direction of travel and separately for two-way traffic. The results reveal that the Gaussian kernel-based SVM model yields the lowest errors, improving AADT accuracy by 65% and decreasing the standard deviation of absolute percentage error by 73.7% over the traditional method. Another finding is that the assignment errors of the directional volume-based analysis are lower than those of the total volume-based analysis by 41.8%. The comparison between the two model parameters examined—the average daily traffic and the hourly factors—indicates that the combined use of both parameters in SVMs is more effective than when hourly factors are used alone. However, in the case of DA, the opposite results are obtained. A possible explanation is that the SVM kernels transfer data from the input space to a feature space and thus provide the ability to assign counts effectively with different types of data within the same model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3141/2527-02

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML methods such as SVMs and neural networks have made it easier to classify roads with similar traffic patterns.

    “ML methods, such as SVMs and neural networks, have made it easier to classify roads with similar traffic patterns [270,454,796].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [796]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsapakis, I., & Schneider, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University System (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
Corresponding author
Tsapakis, Ioannis
Venue
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2015-01
Volume
2527
Issue
1
Pages
8-17
ISSN
  • 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 2169-4052
OpenAlex
W2244103319
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio Department of Transportation
  • Federal Highway Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Transport Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
annual average daily traffic, support vector machine, discriminant analysis, traffic volume estimation, Gaussian kernel, two-way traffic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review