The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'
Open accessAbstract
In an historical overview, this paper links to the paradox that the increasing scientification of politics leads to a politicisation of science. For a long time, scientists offered their capabilities as ‘speaking truth to power’. Since the beginning of the 1990s, this input has been transformed into an argumentative policy analysis. This reinvigorates political prudence as ‘making sense together’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
(1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 15,085
(2014) · The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education · doi:10.1057/9781137399595.0007 · Cited by 8,325
(2014) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research · doi:10.4135/9781446294406.n148 · Cited by 7,250
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.
Parsons, H. L., & Giddens, A. (1980) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2107414 · Cited by 4,926
Social Construction of Reality
(2020) · The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society · doi:10.4135/9781483375519.n617 · Cited by 4,707
The Open Society and Its Enemies
Popper, K. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203439913 · Cited by 3,505
(2020) · Radical Treatment · doi:10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9 · Cited by 3,373
The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
(1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822381815 · Cited by 1,992
Cited by
Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science–policy interface
Wesselink, A., Buchanan, K. S., Georgiadou, Y., & Turnhout, E. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008 · Cited by 224
Problematizing ‘wickedness’: a critique of the wicked problems concept, from philosophy to practice
Turnbull, N., & Hoppe, R. (2019) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488796 · Cited by 181
Self-citationWhat happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research
Hupe, P. (2014) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/0952076713518339 · Cited by 146
The questioning theory of policy practice: Outline of an integrated analytical framework
Turnbull, N. (2013) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.776501 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoppe, R.
- Venue
- Science and Public Policy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-210
- ISSN
- 0302-3427 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5430
- OpenAlex
- W2127114917
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 34.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3152/147154399781782482
- The paper
- Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together'. Science and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154399781782482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
