Exploring the Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening through the Lens of Implementers and Beneficiaries of the National Screening Program: A Multi-Contextual Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a major reason for morbidity and mortality in Low and Middle income countries. The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancers, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS) sets out broad national guideline to implement Cervical cancer screening. However, an implementation strategy for cervical cancer screening is not in place for districts. Although opportunistic screening takes place, implementation is hindered by psychological and physical barriers for women, as well as insufficient capacity on the part of implementers. This qualitative study aims to identify the specific barriers that prevent the uptake of cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Women who could benefit from cervical cancer program were interviewed to explore the factors that influenced their uptake of the cervical screening offered. Key informant interviews were conducted with implementers of the NPCDCS and with public health staff of three States (Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya and Karnataka), to understand their perception of determinants of the utilization of screening services. RESULTS: The general health concern among the participants was low, and routine check-ups were considered unimportant. Poor knowledge about cervical cancer, benefits of screening service availability, as well as a general sense of well-being, embarrassment or anxiety related to the screening procedure, fear of being judged for lack of modesty, and stigma were common barriers to screening uptake. In addition to a general unawareness of cervical cancer geographical inaccessibility of screening as a barrier to participate in cervical cancer screening, in certain regions. CONCLUSION: It is essential to increase the knowledge on cervical cancer and on the benefits of screening among Indian women. Providing information and cues to action by health workers and professionals can facilitate the decision to participate. Implementers need to be involved to ensure context specific implementation of the National programme to overcome these barriers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Competing life demands such as other diseases, childcare responsibility, no possibility to take time off, and being busy with housework are widely cited barriers.
“Barriers such as other diseases, responsibility of childcare, no possibility to take time off, and being busy with housework are widely cited [9,13,22,23,30].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
The Results (page unavailable) report that many women were too busy with housework to find time for cervical screening. The passages do not identify other diseases, childcare responsibilities, or inability to take time off as barriers; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEmbarrassment or shame can hinder CRC and CC screening.
“Embarrassment or shame can hinder CRC and CC screening [7,15,30].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
The Results identify shame and embarrassment as barriers to cervical cancer (CC) screening and report that embarrassment about the procedure was a common reason for not participating. The cited paper does not address colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, so it supports only the CC portion of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion
Stokols, D. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282 · Cited by 2,763 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Agurto I Bishop A Sanchez G Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America Prev Med 2004 39 91 8 15207990
- Aswathy S Quereshi MA Kurian B Cervical cancer screening: Current knowledge and practice among women in a rural population of Kerala, India Indian J Med Res 2012 136 205 22960886 PMC3461731
- Dahiya N Aggarwal K Singh MC Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the screening of cervical cancer among women in New Delhi, India Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019 31 240 31867252 PMC6905229
- Darj E Chalise P Shakya S Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in Nepal: A qualitative study Sex Reprod Healthc 2019 20 20 6 31084813
- Devarapalli P Labani S Nagarjuna N Barriers affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening in low and middle income countries: A systematic review Indian J Cancer 2018 55 318 30829264
- Dhillon PK Mathur P Nandakumar A The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016 Lancet Oncol 2018 19 1289 306 30219626 PMC6167407
- Fort VK Makin MS Siegler AJ Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Mulanje, Malawi: a qualitative study Patient Prefer Adherence 2011 5 125 21448296 PMC3063659
- Hsieh H-F Shannon SE Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qual Health Res 2005 15 1277 88 16204405
- Krok-Schoen JL Oliveri JM Young GS Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women Women Health 2016 56 468 86 26479700 PMC4928634
- Lyimo FS Beran TN Demographic, knowledge, attitudinal, and accessibility factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in a rural district of Tanzania: three public policy implications BMC Public Health 2012 12 22 22233530 PMC3299640
- Markovic M Kesic V Matejic B Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia Soc Sci Med 2005 61 2528 35 15953668
- Marston C King E Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review Lancet 2006 368 1581 6 17084758
- Mittra I Mishra GA Singh S A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening Int J Cancer 2010 126 976 84 19697326
- Mohanan M Hay K Mor N Quality of health care in India: challenges, priorities, and the road ahead Health Aff 2016 35 1753 8 27702945
- Nguyen TT McPhee SJ Bui-Tong N Community-based participatory research increases cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-Americans J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006 17 31 54 16809874
- Pirzadeh A Mazaheri MA The effect of education on women’s practice based on the health belief model about pap smear test Int J Prev Med 2012 3 585 22973490 PMC3429807
- Sankaranarayanan R Rajkumar R Arrossi S Determinants of participation of women in a cervical cancer visual screening trial in rural south India Cancer Detect Prev 2003 27 457 65 14642554
- Shah V Vyas S Singh A Awareness and knowledge of cervical cancer and its prevention among the nursing staff of a tertiary health institute in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India Ecancermedicalscience 2012 6 270 23008746 PMC3437739
- Vahabi M Lofters A Muslim immigrant women’s views on cervical cancer screening and HPV self-sampling in Ontario, Canada BMC Public Health 2016 16 868 27557928 PMC4997745
- Vedantham H Silver MI Kalpana B Determinants of VIA (Visual Inspection of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Application) positivity in cervical cancer screening of women in a peri-urban area in Andhra Pradesh, India Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010 19 1373 80 20447927 PMC2913449
- WHO Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice 2006 World Health Organization 25642554
- WHO WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention 2013 World Health Organization 24716265
- Wong L Wong Y Low W Cervical cancer screening attitudes and beliefs of Malaysian women who have never had a pap smear: a qualitative study Int J Behav Med 2008 15 289 92 19005928
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sociodemographic correlates of cervix, breast and oral cancer screening among Indian women
Changkun, Z., Bishwajit, G., Ji, L., & Tang, S. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265881 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W. (2022) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02019-y · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationMaheshwari, V., Girotra, S., Malik, M., & Basu, S. (2025) · Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_99_24 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review
Palsola, M., Likki, T., Snijders, V., Corbex, M., Lasierra, L., & Curtis, B. (2026) · Glasnik javnog zdravlja · doi:10.5937/serbjph2601086p
- Authors
- Dsouza, J. P., Van den Broucke, S., Pattanshetty, S., & Dhoore, W.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Dsouza, Jyoshma Preema
- Venue
- Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
- Publisher
- EpiSmart Science Vector Ltd
- Published
- 2020-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2209-2215
- ISSN
- 1513-7368 (ISSN-L)
- 2476-762X
- PMC
- PMC7771922
- OpenAlex
- W3082792928
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Indian Council of Medical Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- cervical cancer screening, screening uptake barriers, opportunistic screening, stigma, health knowledge, healthcare workers, implementation barriers, women's health, India
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Personnel, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Prognosis, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review