Cited by 7Women's cancer prevention and managementCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Prevalence and predictors of cervical cancer screening among married women in India: A cross-sectional analysis of National Family Health Survey-5 data

Open access
Maheshwari, Vansh, Girotra, Siaa, Malik, Mansi, Basu, Saurav·2025·Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a major public health issue in India despite affordable screening options due to their low utilization. Objectives: The primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of cervical cancer screening among married women in India, while the secondary objective was to identify the predictors, barriers, and facilitators influencing screening uptake in this population. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analysis was conducted at the Indian Institute of Public Health - Delhi, under the Public Health Foundation of India, from January to March 2024. In this study, we utilized data from the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5: 2019-2021) conducted by the International Institute of Population Studies. The study outcomes measured were the self-reported uptake of cervical cancer screening and their sociodemographic and behavioral determinants. Statistical analyses comprised descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and multivariable negative binomial regression, supplemented by dominance analysis to assess the comparative significance of predictors. Results: We analyzed responses from 330,345 married women aged 30-49 years. The prevalence of cervical cancer screening was low ( n = 5074, 1.9%, 95% CI: 1.8-2.1). Significantly higher odds of cervical cancer screening were observed among women of age 40-49 years, having higher education level, urban residence, wealthier quintiles, and with additional comorbidities. Conversely, tobacco and alcohol consumption and higher parity were associated with lower screening rates. Dominance analysis identified wealth index as the strongest predictor of cervical cancer screening among married Indian women, with higher rates in southern regions. Conclusion: Cervical cancer screening uptake among Indian women is critically low, with significant disparities driven by socioeconomic status, education, and geography indicative of the need for augmenting its awareness, access, and availability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/crst.crst_99_24

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Maheshwari, V., Girotra, S., Malik, M., & Basu, S.
Affiliations
  • Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
  • Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata (IN)
Corresponding author
Basu, Saurav
Venue
Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment
Published
2025-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
30-38
ISSN
  • 2590-3225 (ISSN-L)
  • 2590-3233
OpenAlex
W4408935461
Cited by
7
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research Statistics and Treatment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, screening uptake, married women, India, sociodemographic factors, socioeconomic status, wealth index, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, parity, regional disparities, barriers to screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review