A phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences and self-management challenges among patients with type 2 diabetes living with neuropathy in Indonesia
Open accessAbstract
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a widespread chronic condition often complicated by Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN). Over time, T2D with DPN can diminish a patient's capacity for self-management in their daily home life. Therefore, understanding patients' lived experiences in managing self-management is crucial to prevent further complications. However, studies exploring this critical concern are scarce, which can pose challenges for community nursing practice. This study intended to investigate the lived experiences, perceived barriers, and coping strategies related to self-management among patients with T2D and DPN. To achieve this objective, a phenomenological study design was utilized. A total of twelve participants were selected through purposive sampling. All participants had confirmed protective sensation loss, as evidenced by positive results from a 10g monofilament test. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted in the participants' homes between November 2021 and January 2022. Transcripts were analyzed verbatim using Colaizzi's method. The study identified five major themes: limited knowledge of diabetes self-management, varied blood glucose regulation strategies, barriers to diabetes care, physical and psychological consequences of DPN, and the crucial role of family and peer support in reinforcing treatment adherence. Nurses should emphasize the importance of family member engagement in daily diabetes care, as this provides essential practical and emotional support. Future nursing research should investigate intervention models that integrate educational support, community counseling, and family involvement across broader diabetes populations. Keywords: Neuropathy, phenomenology, self-management, social support, type 2 diabetes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
“This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines [6] (see Supplemental Table 1).”
From Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review
Khandoker, F., & Grigsby, T. J. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app151910567 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nugraha, N. J., Dewi, Z. L., Yualita, P., Dharmansyah, D., & Sham, F. (2026) · Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice · doi:10.58545/jrcnp.v4i2.950
- Authors
- Saltar, L., Sahar, J., Rekawati, E., & Ayubi, D.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Mandala Waluya (ID)
- University of Indonesia (ID)
- Venue
- Journal of Holistic Nursing Science
- Publisher
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
- Published
- 2025-07-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 214-227
- ISSN
- 1979-1453 (ISSN-L)
- 2579-7751
- 2579-8472
- OpenAlex
- W7077045819
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Holistic Nursing Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, diabetes self-management, lived experience, barriers to diabetes care, coping strategies, blood glucose regulation, family support, peer support, medication adherence, social support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review