Cited by 2Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Research

Methodological Approaches in Studying Type-2 Diabetes-Related Health Behaviors—A Systematic Review

Open access
Khandoker, Farhana, Grigsby, Timothy J.·2025·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents growing public health challenges due to its strong links to modifiable behaviors. This systematic review examined how researchers have studied behavioral domains such as diet, physical activity, medication adherence, and blood glucose monitoring in adults with T2D. A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies published between 2003 and 2025, with studies from 2014 onward prioritized to reflect the rise in mobile health technologies. 30 core studies were systematically reviewed, with 10 additional comparative studies included for supplementary methodological insights. Quantitative approaches were most common, offering measurable outcomes but often relying on self-report. Qualitative studies provided valuable cultural and psychosocial context yet lacked generalizability. Mixed-methods designs integrated statistical and narrative insights but posed practical challenges in execution. Technology-assisted methods, such as mobile applications and wearable devices, supported real-time monitoring and improved accuracy but raised concerns regarding privacy and equitable access. Physical activity and dietary behaviors were most frequently studied, while medication adherence and glucose monitoring received less consistent attention. Despite methodological diversity, most studies relied on cross-sectional designs and underutilized culturally tailored frameworks. This review emphasizes the need for longitudinal, equity-focused research methodologies to improve diabetes prevention and management strategies.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review compares quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and technology-assisted approaches used to study diet, physical activity, medication adherence, and SMBG in adults with T2DM. It finds quantitative designs dominate (77%, n=23), technology-assisted methods score highest on accuracy/specificity, and most studies remain cross-sectional, self-report-based, and lacking culturally adapted tools.

Key findings

  • Four dominant methodological categories were identified: quantitative (77%, n=23), technology-assisted (30%, n=9), qualitative (~6%, n=2), and mixed-methods (~6%, n=2; discussion reports 6.7%, n=2).
  • Physical activity and dietary behaviors were the most frequently assessed domains; among quantitative studies, dietary behaviors were assessed in 56%, physical activity in 48%, and medication adherence in 43%. Among technology-assisted studies, physical activity was targeted in 67% (6/9), medication adherence in 44% (4/9), dietary behaviors in 33% (3/9), and SMBG in 22% (2/9).
  • Table 4 reports methodological metrics as: quantitative accuracy 85%, sensitivity 88%, specificity 83%; qualitative 70%, 72%, 65%; mixed-methods 78%, 80%, 74%; technology-assisted 88%, 85%, 86%. The paper states these scores are percentages reflecting relative strengths rather than direct values from individual studies.
  • Gaps include reliance on self-reported data in approximately 65% of quantitative studies, predominance of cross-sectional designs, underexploration of SMBG, limited cultural adaptation, and rarely addressed digital inequities.

Methods

  • PRISMA 2020 systematic review of peer-reviewed articles published 2003–2025 involving adults aged 18+ with T2DM; included studies focused on diet, physical activity, medication adherence, or SMBG; excluded non-peer-reviewed, non-English, clinical/pharmacological-only, pediatric, and review/conference abstract/protocol studies without empirical data.
  • Search yielded 120 records; after removing 38 duplicates, 82 titles/abstracts were screened, 40 were excluded, 42 underwent full-text review, and 30 met inclusion criteria; an additional 12 papers were added for comparative methodological analysis (the abstract reports 30 peer-reviewed studies and 10 comparative studies).
  • Data extracted included methodological design, participant characteristics, setting, targeted health behaviors, and measurement instruments; studies were categorized by methodology and assessed through a conceptual framework of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, without formal quality scores such as JBI; approximate values were derived when metrics were not reported.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated: no standardized quality appraisal tool such as the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used; approximate accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values were derived for studies that did not report them; the search approach may introduce bias by prioritizing certain methodological strategies.
  • Paper-stated: most studies used cross-sectional or short-term designs, many relied on self-report, culturally adapted tools were underused, digital inequities were rarely addressed, and qualitative/mixed-methods samples were small and limited in generalizability.
  • Evident from the text: the provided full text is marked “NOT PEER-REVIEWED” as a preprint, and there are count inconsistencies (abstract says 10 comparative studies; methods says 12 additional papers); several tables also appear truncated or misaligned.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app151910567

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

44 of 64 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    [37] integrated behavioral surveys with risk perception analysis to assess the gap between perceived and actual preventive behaviors.

    “For instance, [23] employed a combination of surveys and clinical assessments to investigate racial disparities in sleep and diabetes risk, while [37] integrated behavioral surveys with risk perception analysis to assess the gap between perceived and actual preventive behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Geng, T., Zhu, K., Lu, Q., Wan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, L., Pan, A., and Liu, G. (2023). Healthy lifestyle behaviors, mediating biomarkers, and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study. PLoS Med., 20. source

      The Methods section (‘Measurements of lifestyle behaviors’; page unavailable) describes questionnaire-derived and self-reported lifestyle data, supporting the behavioral-survey part. It does not describe risk-perception analysis or a comparison between perceived and actual preventive behaviors; the Results instead examine lifestyle behaviors and microvascular complications. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Cohort studies and large-scale meta-analyses exemplify designs expected to demonstrate high sensitivity in identifying behavioral trends.

    “Cohort studies and large-scale meta-analyses [11,12] exemplify designs expected to demonstrate high sensitivity in identifying behavioral trends.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Thomas, J., and Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 8. source

      The Methods (Searching) section discusses how statistical meta-analyses differ from qualitative syntheses, while the Discussion (Study quality and sensitivity analyses) uses “sensitivity analyses” to mean testing the effect of including studies of differing quality. Neither passage addresses whether cohort studies or large-scale meta-analyses have high sensitivity for identifying behavioral trends; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Niskanen, 2006, Serum Uric Acid as a Harbinger of Metabolic Outcome in Subjects With Impaired Glucose Tolerance The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study, Diabetes Care source
  • Findingcitation

    [23] employed a combination of surveys and clinical assessments to investigate racial disparities in sleep and diabetes risk.

    “For instance, [23] employed a combination of surveys and clinical assessments to investigate racial disparities in sleep and diabetes risk, while [37] integrated behavioral surveys with risk perception analysis to assess the gap between perceived and actual preventive behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Egede, 2011, Effectiveness of technology-assisted case management in low income adults with type 2 diabetes (TACM-DM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials source

      The Methods (Study Instruments and Data Collection Schedule; Data Analysis; pages unavailable) propose questionnaires and clinical measurements, with race/ethnicity considered in exploratory analyses. But this is a trial protocol for adults with type 2 diabetes, not a completed investigation of racial disparities in sleep or diabetes risk; the searched passages do not identify a sleep measure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Studies that used objective tools such as biomarkers, wearable devices, or continuous glucose monitoring were conceptually associated with higher accuracy than those that relied on self-reported measures.

    “Studies that used objective tools such as biomarkers, wearable devices, or continuous glucose monitoring, including those [9,10], were conceptually associated with higher accuracy than those that relied on self-reported measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Page, 2021, The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, BMJ source

      The Abstract and Discussion describe PRISMA as a guideline for reporting systematic reviews, not a study comparing measurement methods. Searches for biomarkers, wearable devices, continuous glucose monitoring, and self-reported measures found no passage addressing whether objective tools yield higher accuracy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [10] Asif, 2025, The Impact of Digital Health Technologies on Chronic Disease Management, Telehealth Med. Today source
  • Interpretationcitation

    Qualitative approaches helped uncover nuanced factors influencing diabetes-related health behaviors that cannot be easily captured through statistical models alone.

    “Nevertheless, these qualitative approaches helped uncover nuanced factors influencing diabetes-related health behaviors that cannot be easily captured through statistical models alone [39].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Gao, 2024, Lifestyle change in patients with cardiovascular disease: Never too late to adopt a healthy lifestyle, Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. source

      The discussion of lifestyle adherence (labeled Abstract in our copy; no page given) says that multiple factors may facilitate or hinder healthy behaviors. It does not report using qualitative approaches, show that they uncovered those factors in people with diabetes, or compare their insights with statistical models. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 34
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    [35] conducted semi-structured interviews with British Pakistani participants, identifying how intergenerational dietary norms impacted diabetes self-management.

    “[35] conducted semi-structured interviews with British Pakistani participants, identifying how intergenerational dietary norms impacted diabetes self-management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Cradock, K.A., Quinlan, L.R., Finucane, F.M., Gainforth, H.L., Martin Ginis, K.A., Barros, A.C., Sanders, E.B., and ÓLaighin, G. (2021). Identifying barriers and facilitators to diet and physical activity behaviour change in type 2 diabetes using a design probe methodology. J. Pers. Med., 11. source

      The Methods (§2.1, page unavailable) say participants were recruited in Galway, Ireland, and §2.3 describes daily self-documentation using a design probe, not semi-structured interviews. The Results (§3) analyze those probes; the paper does not identify its participants as British Pakistani or report an analysis of intergenerational dietary norms. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    [33] observed that diabetes fatalism significantly varied by ethnicity in a diverse college student sample, influencing engagement in preventive behaviors.

    “Similarly, [33] observed that diabetes fatalism significantly varied by ethnicity in a diverse college student sample, influencing engagement in preventive behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Xie, Z., Liu, K., Or, C., Chen, J., Yan, M., and Wang, H. (2020). An examination of the socio-demographic correlates of patient adherence to self-management behaviors and the mediating roles of health attitudes and self-efficacy among patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and hypertension. BMC Public Health, 20. source

      The Results > Sample characteristics section describes 148 patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension whose mean age was 63.72 years, not a college-student sample. The paper reports associations involving adherence and self-efficacy; the only occurrence of “diabetes fatalism” found is in a reference title, not a finding about ethnic variation or preventive behaviors. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Among the nine technology-assisted studies, physical activity was the most commonly targeted behavior (67%, 6/9 studies), followed by medication adherence (44%, 4/9), dietary behaviors (33%, 3/9), and self-monitoring of blood glucose (22%, 2/9).

    “Among the nine technology-assisted studies, physical activity was the most commonly targeted behavior (67%, 6/9 studies), followed by medication adherence (44%, 4/9), dietary behaviors (33%, 3/9), and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (22%, 2/9) [10,20,23], [25,26,30,31,34,37].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim6 of 9 sources checked
    • cites [10] Asif, 2025, The Impact of Digital Health Technologies on Chronic Disease Management, Telehealth Med. Today source
    • cites [20] Nilsson, 2004, Incidence of Diabetes in Middle-Aged Men Is Related to Sleep Disturbances, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [23] Egede, 2011, Effectiveness of technology-assisted case management in low income adults with type 2 diabetes (TACM-DM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials source
    • cites [25] von Ruesten, A., Weikert, C., Fietze, I., and Boeing, H. (2012). Association of sleep duration with chronic diseases in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (epic)-potsdam study. PLoS ONE, 7. source

      The Statistical analyses passage describes a study of sleep duration and incident chronic disease, with walking, cycling, and sports measured as covariates. Searches for technology-assisted studies, medication adherence, and blood-glucose self-monitoring found no passage reporting the nine-study count or the claimed percentages. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] Jackson, 2013, Association between sleep duration and diabetes in black and white adults, Diabetes Care source

      The Research Design and Methods sections describe a survey analysis of sleep duration and diabetes; physical activity is measured as a participant characteristic. Searches for technology-assisted studies, medication adherence, dietary behaviors, SMBG, and the stated study counts found no passage addressing the claimed breakdown. The supplied passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [30] Xu, 2016, Elevation of serum uric acid and incidence of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. source

      The Results (‘Included and excluded articles’; page unavailable) describe 16 studies of serum uric acid and type 2 diabetes, not nine technology-assisted studies. A search for technology-assisted studies, medication adherence, dietary behaviors, and blood-glucose self-monitoring found no passage reporting the claimed behavior counts or percentages. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [31] Amuta, 2016, Gender Differences in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Perception, Attitude, and Protective Health Behaviors: A Study of Overweight and Obese College Students, Am. J. Health Educ. source
    • cites [34] Lim, 2021, Effects of a Technology-Assisted Integrated Diabetes Care Program on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the Asia-Pacific Region: The JADE Program Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA Netw. Open source
    • cites [37] Geng, T., Zhu, K., Lu, Q., Wan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, L., Pan, A., and Liu, G. (2023). Healthy lifestyle behaviors, mediating biomarkers, and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study. PLoS Med., 20. source

      The Methods section, “Measurements of lifestyle behaviors” (page unavailable), evaluates physical activity and diet in a cohort but does not describe technology-assisted studies. Searches for the nine-study count, the reported percentages, medication adherence, and self-monitoring of blood glucose found no passage in our copy addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inadequate adherence to T2DM health behaviors substantially increases risk of long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications, reduces quality of life, and contributes to economic burden.

    “Inadequate adherence to these behaviors substantially increases the risk of long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications, reduces quality of life, and contributes to the growing economic burden of diabetes-related care [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Caballero-María, P., Caballero-Villarraso, J., Arenas-Montes, J., Díaz-Cáceres, A., Castañeda-Nieto, S., Alcalá-Díaz, J.F., Delgado-Lista, J., Rodríguez-Cantalejo, F., Pérez-Martínez, P., and López-Miranda, J. (2025). Deep Learning Model Approach to Predict Diabetes Type 2 Based on Clinical, Biochemical, and Gut Microbiota Profiles. Appl. Sci., 15. source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) links unhealthy diets and insufficient physical activity to vascular complications and says care can prevent or delay complications and improve quality of life. The Conclusions (page unavailable) link T2DM complications to substantial healthcare and indirect costs. Neither section specifically establishes that inadequate adherence to health behaviors substantially increases all these risks or directly causes the stated quality-of-life and economic effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Studies such as [20,25,26,31] implemented these technologies to enhance patient self-monitoring, treatment adherence, and real-time behavioral tracking.

    “Studies such as [20,25,26,31] implemented these technologies to enhance patient self-monitoring, treatment adherence, and real-time behavioral tracking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [20] Nilsson, 2004, Incidence of Diabetes in Middle-Aged Men Is Related to Sleep Disturbances, Diabetes Care source
    • cites [25] von Ruesten, A., Weikert, C., Fietze, I., and Boeing, H. (2012). Association of sleep duration with chronic diseases in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (epic)-potsdam study. PLoS ONE, 7. source

      The Study population section describes baseline interviews and mailed follow-up questionnaires; the Assessment of chronic diseases section describes self-reports used to ascertain outcomes. Neither says the study implemented technologies to improve patient self-monitoring, treatment adherence, or real-time behavioral tracking. Searches for those uses and for digital or wearable tracking found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [26] Jackson, 2013, Association between sleep duration and diabetes in black and white adults, Diabetes Care source

      The National Health Interview Survey section describes a cross-sectional survey using computer-assisted interviews, not a technology implemented to improve patient care. The Measures section describes self-reported sleep, diabetes, and health behaviors; searches for self-monitoring, treatment adherence, and real-time behavioral tracking found no passage addressing those uses. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [31] Amuta, 2016, Gender Differences in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Perception, Attitude, and Protective Health Behaviors: A Study of Overweight and Obese College Students, Am. J. Health Educ. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current approaches to studying T2DM behaviors include quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and emerging digital health technologies, each with distinct advantages and limitations.

    “Current approaches include quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and emerging digital health technologies, each offering distinct advantages and limitations [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Kruger, 2025, Development and evaluation of the Flourish Diabetes Programme, Health SA Gesondheid source

      The Introduction discusses benefits and barriers of diabetes technology, and Research methods and design describes interviews and an open-ended questionnaire. But these passages concern adolescents with type 1 diabetes and the development of an intervention; they do not present a comparison of approaches to studying type 2 diabetes behaviours or the distinct advantages and limitations of surveys, interviews, and digital health technologies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    This approach is consistent with guidance for narrative and methodological reviews where emphasis is on evaluating design performance rather than scoring study-level rigor.

    “This approach is consistent with guidance for narrative and methodological reviews where the emphasis is on evaluating design performance rather than scoring study-level rigor [8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Wheeler, 2024, Acceptability and experiences of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes using insulin: A qualitative study, J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. source

      The Methods > Data analysis section describes inductive coding of interviews, and the Discussion evaluates strengths and limitations of this qualitative diabetes study (page numbers unavailable). Neither provides guidance for narrative or methodological reviews, or addresses evaluating design performance instead of scoring study-level rigor; searches for those terms found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Real-time data collection enhances accuracy and enables dynamic feedback loops between patients and providers.

    “Studies like [31] and [25] demonstrate how real-time data collection enhances accuracy and enables dynamic feedback loops between patients and providers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Amuta, 2016, Gender Differences in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Perception, Attitude, and Protective Health Behaviors: A Study of Overweight and Obese College Students, Am. J. Health Educ. source
    • cites [25] von Ruesten, A., Weikert, C., Fietze, I., and Boeing, H. (2012). Association of sleep duration with chronic diseases in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (epic)-potsdam study. PLoS ONE, 7. source

      The Study population section describes mailed follow-up questionnaires every 2–3 years, while Strengths and limitations says sleep duration was measured only at recruitment. Searches for real-time collection and patient–provider feedback found no passage showing that such collection improves accuracy or enables feedback loops. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    [25] reported that remote monitoring was particularly beneficial in underserved communities.

    “[25] reported that remote monitoring was particularly beneficial in underserved communities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] von Ruesten, A., Weikert, C., Fietze, I., and Boeing, H. (2012). Association of sleep duration with chronic diseases in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (epic)-potsdam study. PLoS ONE, 7. source

      The Abstract and Conclusion address sleep duration and chronic-disease risk, not remote monitoring. Searches for remote monitoring and benefits in underserved communities found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Mixed-methods designs achieved 78% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 74% specificity.

    “They achieved 78% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 74% specificity, and were particularly useful in understanding the motivations behind complex behaviors such as diet and exercise [23,37].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] Egede, 2011, Effectiveness of technology-assisted case management in low income adults with type 2 diabetes (TACM-DM): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, Trials source

      The Methods > Data Analysis section describes planned statistical analyses, not results from mixed-methods designs. Searches for the stated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity figures and for mixed-methods work on diet and exercise found no passage addressing the claim in our copy (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [37] Geng, T., Zhu, K., Lu, Q., Wan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, L., Pan, A., and Liu, G. (2023). Healthy lifestyle behaviors, mediating biomarkers, and risk of microvascular complications among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study. PLoS Med., 20. source

      The Methods sections describe lifestyle scoring and statistical analyses, while the Results report associations with microvascular complications. A search for mixed-methods designs and the stated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity found no passage reporting those performance figures or an analysis of motivations behind diet and exercise. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Physical activity and dietary behaviors were the most frequently assessed domains, followed by medication adherence and glucose monitoring.

    “Physical activity and dietary behaviors were the most frequently assessed domains, followed by medication adherence and glucose monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both qualitative studies employed thematic analysis and purposive sampling techniques.

    “Both studies employed thematic analysis and purposive sampling techniques, offering rich, in-depth insights into behavioral drivers that are often overlooked in quantitative designs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Technology-assisted methods included mobile health applications, wearable fitness trackers, telehealth platforms, electronic medical records, and continuous glucose monitoring systems.

    “These methods included mobile health (mHealth) applications, wearable fitness trackers, telehealth platforms, electronic medical records (EMRs), and continuous glucose monitoring systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Large-scale cohort studies enrolled over 10,000 participants, providing strong statistical power to identify associations between lifestyle behaviors and diabetes outcomes.

    “Large-scale cohort studies, such as those conducted by [13][14][15] enrolled over 10,000 participants, providing strong statistical power to identify associations between lifestyle behaviors and diabetes outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13][14][15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most assessed behavioral domains in quantitative studies included dietary behaviors (56%), physical activity (48%), and medication adherence (43%).

    “The most assessed behavioral domains included dietary behaviors (56%), physical activity (48%), and medication adherence (43%), as summarized in Table 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most frequently used quantitative designs were cohort studies (52%), followed by cross-sectional studies (30%) and randomized controlled trials (18%).

    “The most frequently used designs were cohort studies (52%), followed by cross-sectional studies (30%) and randomized controlled trials (18%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Technology-assisted methods achieved the highest overall performance in methodological metrics: 88% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 86% specificity.

    “As presented in Table 4, technology-assisted methods achieved the highest overall performance in methodological metrics: 88% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 86% specificity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Qualitative methods achieved 70% accuracy, 72% sensitivity, and 65% specificity.

    “While qualitative methods achieved 70% accuracy, 72% sensitivity, and 65% specificity, their smaller purposive samples limited generalizability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Technology-assisted methods were employed in 30% (n = 9) of studies and emerged as the most effective overall, demonstrating the highest accuracy (88%), sensitivity (85%), and specificity (86%).

    “Technology-assisted methods were employed in 30% (n = 9) of studies and emerged as the most effective overall, demonstrating the highest accuracy (88%), sensitivity (85%), and specificity (86%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Technology-assisted approaches outperformed other methods in overall accuracy and specificity, while quantitative designs demonstrated the highest sensitivity.

    “As shown in Table 4, technology-assisted approaches outperformed other methods in overall accuracy and specificity, while quantitative designs demonstrated the highest sensitivity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Intergenerational dietary practices and familial expectations affected both food choices and the reception of behavioral interventions.

    “These studies found that intergenerational dietary practices and familial expectations affected both food choices and the reception of behavioral interventions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Qualitative studies commonly targeted dietary behaviors (100%) and medication adherence (50%), using thematic analysis and semi-structured interviews.

    “These studies commonly targeted dietary behaviors (100%) and medication adherence (50%), using thematic analysis and semi-structured interviews.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Many reviewed studies continue to rely on self-reported data, few have adopted longitudinal designs, and culturally adapted methodologies are underused.

    “Many studies continue to rely on self-reported data, few have adopted longitudinal designs, and culturally adapted methodologies are underused.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among the four methodological approaches, technology-assisted had the highest accuracy (88%) and specificity (86%), while quantitative had the highest sensitivity (88%).

    “| Technology-Assisted | 88 | 85 | 86 |”
    • Also stated in: § 6. Conclusions · plain
      “| Quantitative | 85 | 88 | 83 |”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are meaningful criteria for comparing methodological approaches, including qualitative ones.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Mixed-methods research is gaining traction for its ability to integrate quantitative metrics with qualitative insights.

    “While still underutilized, this approach is gaining traction for its ability to integrate quantitative metrics with qualitative insights.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Digital health tools, though effective, are not yet equitably accessible across all populations.

    “In addition, digital health tools, though effective, are not yet equitably accessible across all populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Reported or estimated values of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were synthesized for each study to support cross-methodological comparison.

    “To support cross-methodological comparison, reported or estimated values of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were synthesized for each study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

    “This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines [6] (see Supplemental Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Saltar, 2025, A phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences and self-management challenges among patients with type 2 diabetes living with neuropathy in Indonesia, J. Holist. Nurs. Sci. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The mixed approach ensured consistency in evaluating methodological quality while acknowledging variation in reporting practices across studies.

    “This mixed approach ensured consistency in evaluating methodological quality while acknowledging variation in reporting practices across studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These metrics reflect the methodological strength of quantitative studies in large-scale behavioral assessments, although they may not fully capture the complexity of individual experiences.

    “These metrics reflect the methodological strength of quantitative studies in large-scale behavioral assessments, although they may not fully capture the complexity of individual experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The review applied a conceptual framework based on three parameters: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

    “To guide the evaluation of methodological quality across the included studies, this review applied a conceptual framework based on three parameters: accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Mixed-methods research enhances interpretive depth and methodological triangulation.

    “While mixed-methods research enhances interpretive depth and methodological triangulation, it also requires greater resources, time, and analytic expertise, making it among the most complex and costly study designs to implement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The structured design of quantitative methods can limit deeper exploration of psychosocial or contextual influences on behavior.

    “While quantitative methods allow for generalizability across diverse populations, their structured design can limit deeper exploration of psychosocial or contextual influences on behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Effective management of T2DM requires sustained engagement in health-related behaviors, including balanced diet, regular physical activity, proper medication use, and self-monitoring of blood glucose.

    “Effective management of T2DM requires sustained engagement in health-related behaviors, including adherence to a balanced diet, regular physical activity, proper medication use, and selfmonitoring of blood glucose levels [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Brzan, 2016, Mobile Applications for Control and Self Management of Diabetes: A Systematic Review, J. Med. Syst. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Rather than applying formal quality scores, the review emphasized contextual evaluation.

    “Rather than applying formal quality scores, the review emphasized contextual evaluation to better understand the strengths and limitations of each methodological approach.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The search strategy may introduce bias by prioritizing certain methodological strategies over others.

    “While this approach helped narrow the scope of the review, it may introduce bias by prioritizing certain methodological strategies over others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Quantitative methods allow for generalizability across diverse populations.

    “While quantitative methods allow for generalizability across diverse populations, their structured design can limit deeper exploration of psychosocial or contextual influences on behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    An additional 12 papers were added for comparative methodological analysis.

    “An additional 12 papers were added for comparative methodological analysis involving recent digital and mobile health tools.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The resulting values offer both empirical and contextually inferred insights and should be interpreted accordingly.

    “As such, the resulting values offer both empirical and contextually inferred insights and should be interpreted accordingly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Mixed-methods research requires greater resources, time, and analytic expertise, making it among the most complex and costly study designs to implement.

    “While mixed-methods research enhances interpretive depth and methodological triangulation, it also requires greater resources, time, and analytic expertise, making it among the most complex and costly study designs to implement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The scores are presented as percentages, reflecting relative strengths rather than direct values from individual studies.

    “The scores are presented as percentages, reflecting relative strengths rather than direct values from individual studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The success of technology-assisted methods depended on user access and digital literacy, which varied by region and demographic group.

    “However, their success depended on user access and digital literacy, which varied by region and demographic group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While technology-assisted designs outperform in data precision, their success depends on alignment with research objectives and population needs.

    “While technology-assisted designs outperform in data precision, their success depends on alignment with research objectives and population needs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Technology-assisted methods currently offer the most promise in terms of data accuracy and objectivity.

    “Moreover, while technology-assisted methods currently offer the most promise in terms of data accuracy and objectivity, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches remain essential for understanding motivation, culture, and behavioral context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Technology-assisted methods reduced reliance on self-reporting and improved data objectivity, particularly for physical activity (67% of tech-assisted studies) and medication adherence (44%).

    “These methods reduced reliance on self-reporting and improved data objectivity, particularly for behaviors like physical activity (67% of tech-assisted studies) and medication adherence (44%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Qualitative and mixed-methods approaches remain essential for understanding motivation, culture, and behavioral context.

    “Moreover, while technology-assisted methods currently offer the most promise in terms of data accuracy and objectivity, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches remain essential for understanding motivation, culture, and behavioral context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Technology-assisted tools such as wearables, continuous glucose monitors, and app-based tracking platforms reduce reliance on self-reporting and improve the accuracy and specificity of behavioral data.

    “These methods reduce reliance on self-reporting and improve the accuracy and specificity of behavioral data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The synthesized accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values are comparable across studies and methodological categories.

    “To support cross-methodological comparison, reported or estimated values of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were synthesized for each study.”
    “As such, the resulting values offer both empirical and contextually inferred insights and should be interpreted accordingly.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four methodological categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive for the included studies.

    “The review identified four dominant methodological categories: quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, and technology-assisted designs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 30 reviewed studies are representative of the broader T2DM behavioral research literature.

    “Each method was evaluated across three core criteria accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on patterns synthesized from 30 reviewed studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are meaningful criteria for comparing methodological approaches, including qualitative ones.

    “Each method was evaluated across three core criteria accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity based on patterns synthesized from 30 reviewed studies.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The stated search start year conflicts with included studies

    Minor

    The methodology says 2014 was chosen as the starting point, yet the stated publication range begins in 2003 and Table 1 includes a 2003 study.

  • The number of additional comparative papers changes

    Minor

    The abstract reports 10 comparative studies, whereas the search-strategy section says 12 additional papers were added for comparative methodological analysis.

  • Technology-assisted methods are incorrectly said to have the highest sensitivity

    Minor

    The discussion calls 85% the highest sensitivity, but Table 4 gives quantitative methods a higher sensitivity of 88%.

  • Study [17] is assigned conflicting designs and settings

    Minor

    The qualitative-results section describes [17] as a design-probe study of dietary behavior in Ireland. Table 1 identifies [17] instead as a cohort study of middle-aged men in Sweden.

  • Study [9] is assigned conflicting subjects

    Minor

    Table 3 describes [9] as studying sleep apnea and glycemic control, while Table 1 describes the same numbered study as analyzing serum uric acid to predict diabetes risk.

  • An included study is identified as an excluded study protocol

    Minor

    Table 2 presents [20] among the studies assessed, but the reference identifies it as a study protocol. The stated exclusion criteria rule out protocols without empirical data.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Khandoker, F., & Grigsby, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Grigsby, Timothy J.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-30
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
10567
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414672282
Cited by
2
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, health behavior, diet, physical activity, medication adherence, blood glucose monitoring, mobile health, wearable devices, self-report, mixed methods, cultural tailoring, diabetes prevention, diabetes management, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review