Cited by 1,030Educational Assessment and PedagogyLibrary Science and Information LiteracyInnovations in Medical Education

Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives

Open access
Adams, Nancy E·2015·Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

Abstract

Information professionals who train or instruct others can use Bloom's taxonomy to write learning objectives that describe the skills and abilities that they desire their learners to master and demonstrate. Bloom's taxonomy differentiates between cognitive skill levels and calls attention to learning objectives that require higher levels of cognitive skills and, therefore, lead to deeper learning and transfer of knowledge and skills to a greater variety of tasks and contexts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Formative feedback plays a central role in helping learners move beyond basic recall toward higher-order competencies, including analysis, synthesis, and clinical reasoning.

    “In the context of cognitive learning taxonomies such as Bloom's Taxonomy, formative feedback plays a central role in helping learners move beyond basic recall toward higher-order competencies, including analysis, synthesis, and clinical reasoning [11].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, N. E.
Corresponding author
Adams, Nancy E
Venue
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
Published
2015-07
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
152-153
ISSN
  • 1536-5050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9439
OpenAlex
W2397288399
Cited by
1,030
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 126 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 130 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 18
FWCI
142.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
Bloom's taxonomy, learning objectives, cognitive skills, information professionals, instructional design, knowledge transfer, higher-order thinking skills
MeSH terms
Classification, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Teaching, Observer Variation, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review