The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 7 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote
Open accessAbstract
When conducting exhaustive searches for systematic reviews, information professionals search multiple databases with overlapping content [1][2][3][4].They typically remove duplicate records to reduce the reviewers' workload associated with screening titles and abstracts; sometimes the reviewers remove the duplicates.Several articles have been published recently on de-duplication methods.In the authors' opinion, these methods are either very time consuming [5] or impractical, as they require uploading large files to an online platform [6,7].A recent overview article compared existing software programs but found that none was truly satisfactory [8].Unique identifiers for journal articles are digital object identifiers (DOIs) and PubMed IDs (PMIDs).However, these identifiers are not present in every database.When they are present, they often cannot be exported easily.Thus, they cannot be relied upon to identify duplicates.An alternative involves using pagination, because the often large page numbers in scientific journals, in combination with other fields, can serve as a type of unique identifier.However, this is complicated by variations in the way page numbers are stored.Most biomedical databases use a long format (e.g.,
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper describes a detailed EndNote-based method for de-duplicating search results in systematic reviews, using page-number normalization and multiple field-comparison passes. The authors argue it is more systematic and reproducible than other approaches, with reduced manual checking and lower error rates, but it is tailored to EndNote and still fairly complex.
Key findings
- The method has three stages: change field/display settings, import records through a temporary library and adapted export/import filters, then run several duplicate-detection passes with different field settings and remove probable duplicates.
- The authors state that the time spent de-duplicating references and the error rate are “significantly reduced” because only a small subset of records needs manual assessment.
- The method relies on pagination because DOIs and PMIDs are not present in every database and often cannot be exported easily; the paper notes that most biomedical databases use long page-number formats (e.g., 1008-1012) while MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library use abbreviated formats (e.g., 1008-12).
- Table 1 lays out multiple duplicate-removal settings, including field combinations such as Author | Year | Title | Secondary (Journal) | Press, Delete, and other combinations involving Pages, Volume, and Issue.
Methods
- Design: A methods/tool article describing an EndNote workflow for de-duplication; the method was previously presented in a brief conference paper and is here described in detail for EndNote X7.
- Data/sample: Not an empirical sample; the paper discusses importing references from databases including PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library, and notes customized import filters for Embase.com, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus.
- Main analysis: The workflow compares records across multiple field combinations in EndNote, after normalizing page-number formats via custom export/import filters, and uses repeated duplicate-finding steps plus manual checking of subsets to remove false duplicates.
Limitations
- The paper states the method is tuned to EndNote; it notes that Reference Manager was tried but “failed” because too many false duplicates were removed, and Reference Manager is no longer sold/support is likely discontinued.
- The paper says the method is “rather complicated” and has a “steep” learning curve. This is a limitation stated by the authors.
- Evident from the text: the method depends on databases exporting usable page numbers and journal-title formats, and the authors note that differences across databases and changes such as Cochrane’s switch to abbreviated page numbers and CINAHL’s page-length suffixes complicate the workflow.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
11 Own interpretation · 3 Sources not found · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported so far · 1 Own result
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“When conducting exhaustive searches for systematic reviews, information professionals search multiple databases with overlapping content [1-4].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1] 1. Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] 3. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer LA, Dennett L, Clement F. Value of databases other than MEDLINE for rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care. 2014;30(02):173-8. source
- Supportedcites [4] 4. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? a case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. Health Inf Libr J. 2013; 30(1):49-58. source
The Abstract says that comprehensive searches for systematic reviews use multiple databases and that searching and screening their results can be resource-intensive. The Comparison with previous work section describes substantial overlap in trials found across CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Together, these support the cited background statement. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, when we tried our method in Reference Manager, it failed: too many false duplicates were removed.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The only alternative software to EndNote in which the fields that are to be compared in the de-duplication process can be changed is Reference Manager, also provided by Thomson Reuters [14].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14] 14. Reference Manager. Version 12. Thomson Reuters; 2008.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The limitation of this method is that it is tuned to EndNote”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Reference Manager allows comparisons by start pages.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [14] 14. Reference Manager. Version 12. Thomson Reuters; 2008.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, they cannot be relied upon to identify duplicates.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: DOIs and PMIDs are not present in every database.
- Rests on an assumption: When DOIs and PMIDs are present, they often cannot be exported easily.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 5
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“however, in older versions, step 2 in the third column of rows C and D in Table 1 will not work as desired because duplicate references are not highlighted.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It will also work in earlier versions (versions X3 and higher)”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If performed frequently, librarian-mediated de-duplication services can be faster than current methods and less error prone.”
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent overview article compared existing software programs but found that none was truly satisfactory [8].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, simplification of the method (e.g., by reducing the number of different field combinations or by not normalizing page numbers) increases the workload by increasing the number of references to manually assess.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison of start page numbers in Reference Manager appears to be flawed; therefore, tailoring by our method for Reference Manager is not a good alternative.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time spent de-duplicating references and the error rate are significantly reduced because just a small subset of the search results has to be assessed manually.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The last two steps require some additional manual assessment, but screening by page numbers expedites the work, and the number of references to assess is lower than in other methods.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A requisite of this method is that for efficient deduplication, page numbers should include both a start and an end page.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The method described in this paper is for the most recent version of EndNote for Windows, version X7.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The method's strength is based on the specificity of the first two steps, which require no manual assessment.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although this is not strictly necessary, it improves the sensitivity of the first step and, thus, reduces the number of references that have to be checked manually.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Information professionals typically remove duplicate records to reduce the reviewers' workload associated with screening titles and abstracts; sometimes the reviewers remove the duplicates.
“They typically remove duplicate records to reduce the reviewers' workload associated with screening titles and abstracts; sometimes the reviewers remove the duplicates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DOIs and PMIDs are not present in every database.
“However, these identifiers are not present in every database.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When DOIs and PMIDs are present, they often cannot be exported easily.
“When they are present, they often cannot be exported easily.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Page numbers, in combination with other fields, can serve as a type of unique identifier.
“An alternative involves using pagination, because the often large page numbers in scientific journals, in combination with other fields, can serve as a type of unique identifier.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Variations in the way page numbers are stored complicate using pagination.
“However, this is complicated by variations in the way page numbers are stored.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most biomedical databases use a long page number format (e.g., 1008-1012).
“Most biomedical databases use a long format (e.g., 1008-1012)”
The paper relies on this without support.
MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library use an abbreviated page number format (e.g., 1008-12).
“two important databases (MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) use an abbreviated one (e.g., 1008-12).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The de-duplication method designed for EndNote is more systematic, rigorous, and reproducible than procedures regularly carried out by other information professionals.
“Although the de-duplication method that we designed for EndNote resembles procedures regularly carried out by other information professionals, it is more systematic, rigorous, and reproducible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EndNote is commonly used to manage bibliographic records.
“however, EndNote is commonly used to manage bibliographic records.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reference Manager is no longer for sale, and support for Reference Manager will likely be discontinued.
“Additionally, Reference Manager is no longer for sale, and support for Reference Manager will likely be discontinued.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Databases differ in the format of the exported journal titles.
“Databases also differ in the format of the exported journal titles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some databases use abbreviations, while others provide full journal titles.
“Some databases use abbreviations, while others provide full journal titles.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cochrane recently switched from exporting full page numbers to abbreviated page numbers.
“Cochrane recently switched from exporting full page numbers to abbreviated page numbers”
The paper relies on this without support.
CINAHL recently appended the length of the article in the fields for page numbers (e.g., in the format 1008-1012 5p).
“CINAHL recently appended the length of the article in the fields for page numbers (e.g., in the format 1008-1012 5p).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“When combined with human validation, adding import filters for various databases, following specific configurations in EndNote, and considering specific order of metadata import increases sensitivity [ 12 ]”
From Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When searching in multiple databases and additional information sources, as is necessary for a systematic review, authors often employ a variety of techniques to reduce the number of duplicates within their results prior to screening [135 -138].”
From PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021) · cites this paper as [136]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Techniques vary in their efficacy, sensitivity, and specificity (Table 2) [136, 138].”
From PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021) · cites this paper as [136]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The database has been cleared of duplicates using Endnote 21 through the de-duplication method detailed in Bramer et al. (2016).”
From Digital material passports in the AEC industry: a scoping review and conceptualisation of future research challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Bramer et al. (2016)
In the citing paper
“Duplicate articles were excluded by a medical information specialist (LS) using Endnote X20.4 (Clarivate™), following the Amsterdam Efficient Deduplication (AED) method and the Bramer-method (Bramer et al., 2016; Otten et al., 2019).”
From The pursuit for markers of disease progression in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a scoping review to optimize outcome measures for clinical trials (2024) · cites this paper as Bramer et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
Rathbone, J., Carter, M., Hoffmann, T., & Glasziou, P. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-6 · Cited by 206
Identifying and removing duplicate records from systematic review searches
Kwon, Y., Lemieux, M., McTavish, J., & Wathen, N. (2015) · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.004 · Cited by 178 · cited 1×
“A recent overview article compared existing software programs but found that none was truly satisfactory [8].”
Find Duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in Systematic Review
Qi, X., Yang, M., Ren, W., Jia, J., Wang, J., Han, G., & Fan, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071838 · Cited by 98
Beyer, F. R., & Wright, K. (2013) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12009 · Cited by 47
Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases
Jiang, Y., Lin, C., Meng, W., Yu, C., Cohen, A. M., & Smalheiser, N. R. (2014) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/bat086 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“In the authors’ opinion, these methods are either very time consuming [5] or impractical, as they require uploading large files to an online platform [6, 7].”
VALUE OF DATABASES OTHER THAN MEDLINE FOR RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS
Lorenzetti, D. L., Topfer, L.-A., Dennett, L., & Clement, F. (2014) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462314000166 · Cited by 30
Levay, P., Raynor, M., & Tuvey, D. (2015) · Evidence Based Library and Information Practice · doi:10.18438/b82p55 · Cited by 26
Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases
Ahmadi, M., Sarabi, R. E., Orak, R. J., & Bahaadinbeigy, K. (2015) · Acta Informatica Medica · doi:10.5455/aim.2015.23.172-176 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [2]2. search techniques to NICE public health guidance. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2015;10(1):50-68.
- [9]9. Bramer WM, Holland L, Mollema J, Hannon T, Bekhuis - T. Removing duplicates in retrieval sets from electronic databases: comparing the efficiency and accuracy of the Bramer-method with other methods and software packages. Proceedings of the 14th European Association for Health Information and Libraries (EAHIL) Conference, 57-9; Rome, Italy; 11-13 Jun 2014.
- [11]11. National Library of Medicine. PubMed [Internet]. The Library; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. , http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/ . .
- [12]12. Ovid MEDLINE [Internet]. Wolters Kluwer; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. , http://site.ovid.com/pdf/ OvidMedline\_fs.pdf . .
- [13]13. Cochrane. Cochrane Library [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons; 2016 [cited 4 Feb 2016]. , http://www. cochranelibrary.com . .
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,301–1,400 of 1,918
Hiel, M. A. J., Tedbirt, B., Korte, E. W. H., Bolling, M. C., Meijer, J. M., Spuls, P. I., van der Werf, S., Yale, M., Joly, P., & Horváth, B. (2025) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljaf471 · Cited by 2
Facilitating Physical Activity Participation Among Autistic Children and Youth: A Scoping Review
Michaud, M., & Harvey, W. J. (2025) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-025-07141-y · Cited by 2
Idnay, B., Zhang, Y., Therese, K. S., Nestor, J. G., Chung, W. K., & Weng, C. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107270 · Cited by 4
Bruschini, M. M., Nielsen, M. B. D., Naef, R., Schubert, M., & Quasdorf, T. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04179-2 · Cited by 3
“Records identified through the database search were imported into EndNote 20 and deduplicated in line with Bramer et al. [48].”
van der Boog, A. T. J., van Grinsven, E. E., Rados, M., et al. (2025) · Neuro-Oncology Practice · doi:10.1093/nop/npaf122 · Cited by 2
Shabat, C. S., Timmer, F. E. F., Morogianni, K., de Vries, R., de Meij, T. G. J., van der Kruk, N., Verstoep, L. J., Wierdsma, N., & Limbergen, J. V. (2026) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu18010169 · Cited by 2
Galal, B., Dennis, J., Antoniou, A., & Harrison, H. (2026) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-025-03330-9 · Cited by 2
“Allidenti fi ed PGS models, for which suf fi cient information was included in either the original publication or on the PGS Catalog to implement them, were calculated in the UKB cohort.”
Disaster preparedness and needed competencies among critical care nurses: a scoping review
van Esch, A., Dähnert, E., Bramer, W. M., Gommers, D. A. M. P. J., & van Mol, M. M. C. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04275-3 · Cited by 4
“All retrieved records were imported into EndNote 20 for initial deduplication using the method as published by Bramer et al., after which the remaining records were transferred to Covidence® for further deduplication and screening [27].”
Self-citationSaving the split: An umbrella review on therapeutic approaches for cracked tooth syndrome
Kaur, S., Puzhankara, L., Shenoy, N., Sandya Kini, K., & Singhal, D. (2026) · Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics · doi:10.4103/jcde.jcde_796_25 · Cited by 2
“All the references were entered into EndNote X20 (Clarivate Analytics), [23] where automated and manual 59 Scopus ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( “cracked tooth syndrome” OR “cracked tooth” OR “tooth fracture” OR “cuspal fracture” ) ) AND ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( “systematic review” OR “meta-analysis” ) ) 156 Embase…”
Püttner, M., Kohl, M. N., von Stengel, S., et al. (2026) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk11010033 · Cited by 2
“Duplicates were identified and excluded according to Bramer et al. [14].”
Effect of trauma life support training on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nakhid, Z., Wärnberg, M. G., Berg, J., et al. (2026) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-026-01549-w · Cited by 2
“The resulting records were de-duplicated using the Bramer et al. method [17] with the additional step of comparing the digital object identifiers (DOIs) in EndNote [18].”
Joseph, N., McGuinness, M. J., Ratnayake, M., et al. (2026) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.70464 · Cited by 2
“A m e r i c a 5 1 [ 14 ] * O t h e r i n c l u d e s m i s c e ll a n e o u s t e c h n i q u e s o f f i x a t i o n a n d s t u d i e s u s i n g c o m b i n a t i o n s o f f i x a t o r s .”
InfluentialElford, J. D., Heesbeen, E. J., van der Plaats, N. A., Garssen, J., Kraneveld, A. D., Groenink, L., & Perez‐Pardo, P. (2026) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-025-01236-0 · Cited by 2
Ultra-short and zero echo time MRI sequences for MSK investigation: A scoping review
Ferrari, L., Bianchi, T., Champendal, M., dos Reis, C. S., & Ghotra, S. S. (2026) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2026.103334 · Cited by 2
A Scoping Review of Influences on HPV Vaccine Uptake in the Rural US
Gorin, S. S., Hyman, R., Olson, C., Fournier, E. A., Yang, K., Hanko, D., & HPV Review Working Group (2026) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines14020156 · Cited by 2
Wang, H., Yao, J., Jia, S., Chen, W., Guan, Y., Liu, J., Liao, M., Hu, E., & Zhang, Q. (2026) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-026-01042-3 · Cited by 7
“Variance indicators were carefully reviewed, and any data reporting only standard errors (SE) were converted to standard deviations (SD) using the formula: SD = SE × √ N [18].”
Oral health, orofacial pain and dysfunction, and orofacial trauma in athletes: a scoping review
Bousché, G., Lobbezoo, F., de Vries, R., & Verhoeff, M. C. (2026) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-07949-9 · Cited by 2
“0.1 (Clarivate tm ), following the Amsterdam Efficient Deduplication (AED) method [26] and the Bramer method [27].”
InfluentialMaró, Z. M., Jámbor, A., Kovács, S., et al. (2026) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-026-02701-5 · Cited by 2
“…WoS, Covidence for identifying duplications and to screen titles and abstracts applying the PRISMA protocol, R to merge the two databases (Scopus and WoS), while Bibliometrix to conduct the bibliometric analy - sis (Aria and Cuccurullo 2017; Babineau 2014; Bramer et al. 2016; Gupta et al. 2021).”
Yamada, T., Obata, S., Kalaria, A. L., et al. (2026) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.70536 · Cited by 2
Vliegenthart, J., Wols, D. F., Wit, J. M., Bramer, W. M., Rings, E. H. H. M., van den Akker, E. L. T., & van der Kaay, D. C. M. (2026) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvag092 · Cited by 3
“After deduplication in EndNote [34], articles were screened for eligibility.”
Self-citationStekelenburg, J. O., Berge, K., Janssen, S. L. J. E., Omland, T., Myhre, P. L., Thompson, P. D., Aengevaeren, V. L., & Eijsvogels, T. M. H. (2026) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwag218 · Cited by 2
Din, S. U., Kemna, R., Ket, J. C. F., Iqbal, M., Bohoudi, O., Hoogendoorn, M., Beretta, E., & Lisowska, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1819422 · Cited by 7
Klompmaker, P., Opschoor, K., ten Dalen, J., de Vries, M. R., Balan, C. I., Veelo, D. P., Vlaar, A. P. J., & Tuinman, P. R. (2026) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000007219 · Cited by 4
“0.1 (Clarivate, Philadelphia, PA), following the Amsterdam Efficient Deduplication method and the Bramer method (19, 20).”
InfluentialTenge, K., Bhagwandas, N. I., Bos, A., et al. (2026) · Progress in Orthodontics · doi:10.1186/s40510-026-00633-2 · Cited by 2
“Records were de-duplicated in EndNote [12, 13], and imported into Rayyan for screening.”
Do Multimodal Vision-Language Models Enhance the Medical Diagnostic Process? A Systematic Review
Eauchai, L., González, L. O., Shi, Y., McGinnis, M. T., Yovchev, A., Herasevich, S., Pickering, B. W., & Herasevich, V. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14131877 · Cited by 2
“We deduplicated records using a method by Bramer et al. [18].”
Gorospe, F., Istanboulian, L., Puts, M. T. E., Wong, D. T., Lee, E., & Dale, C. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1080/24740527.2020.1785855 · Cited by 3
“The literature results were imported into EndNote X9 and advanced deduplication methods were applied.(38) The results were then imported into Covidence, an online screening tool, where two independent screeners (F.”
MethodRonellenfitsch, U., Meisenbacher, K., Ante, M., Grilli, M., & Böckler, D. (2020) · Gefässchirurgie · doi:10.1007/s00772-020-00671-y · Cited by 2
Justice-Based Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review
Munoz, J. P., Catalano, A., Wang, Y., et al. (2020) · Annals of International Occupational Therapy · doi:10.3928/24761222-20200924-02 · Cited by 2
Unexplained mismatch repair deficiency: Case closed
Eikenboom, E. L., Moen, S., van Leeuwen, L., Geurts-Giele, W. R. R., Tops, C. M. J., van Ham, T. J., Dinjens, W. N. M., Dubbink, H. J., Spaander, M. C. W., & Wagner, A. (2022) · Human Genetics and Genomics Advances · doi:10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100167 · Cited by 2
“Upon our systematic search, duplicates were removed in Endnote X9 (Thompson Reuters, New York, NY, USA), according to the method described by Bramer et al.(14) Studies were screened by two authors (E.”
Methodvan Raaij, J. J., & Janssen, P. K. C. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/41301 · Cited by 2
“Studies collected from different sources will be deduplicated in EndNote [46].”
BackgroundMedication self-management toolkits for adults with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
Guilcher, S. J. T., Cadel, L., He, A., Cimino, S. R., Ahmed, M., Ho, C., Hitzig, S. L., McCarthy, L. M., Patel, T., Hahn‐Goldberg, S., et al. (2023) · Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100282 · Cited by 2
“All articles from the database searcheswere imported into EndNote, and following Bramer's method for de-duplication, the duplicates were removed.(36) After de-duplication, the articles were imported into Covidence (a web-based review management tool) for screening.”
MethodWhitfield, D. L., Miller, R. S., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Mammadli, T., Brown, A. L., Gordon, J. D., & Chandler, C. J. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070969 · Cited by 2
de Jong, L. A., Li, X., Emamipour, S., van der Werf, S., Postma, M. J., van Dijk, P. R., & Feenstra, T. (2023) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-023-00428-9 · Cited by 2
“Dupli-cates are detected and removed following a structured method [19].”
MethodSuleman, S., Calleja, S., Parmar, P. K., & Cohen, E. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075340 · Cited by 3
“26 These deduplicated results will then be imported into the screening and data extraction software Covidence.”
MethodThe Prevalence, Dental Complications, and Effects of Infant Oral Mutilation
Spang, D., Kemoli, A., de Soet, J. J., et al. (2024) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2023.11.012 · Cited by 2
Stingl, J. V., Ortolano, L. C., Azuara‐Blanco, A., et al. (2024) · Ophthalmology Glaucoma · doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.009 · Cited by 2
Outcome of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly: A systematic review
van Tiel, J., Tan, T. C. F., Tee, J. W., et al. (2024) · Brain and Spine · doi:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102775 · Cited by 2
“The search strategy, as well as the method of de-duplication of the retrieved articles was published previously by the librarian of the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands who conducted the search (Bramer et al., 2016, 2018).”
MethodDischarge Interventions for Limited English Proficiency Patients: A Scoping Review
Anaya, M., Law, W., Montoya, H. L., & Moreira, C. (2024) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-024-02003-2 · Cited by 2
“The search results were exported to reference management software (EndNote) which was used to remove duplicates [16].”
Aggestrup, A. S., Martiny, F., Henriksen, L., Davidsen, A. S., & Martiny, K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302229 · Cited by 2
“Records from databases were transferred to EndNote 20 for the removal of duplicates [72].”
MethodRask, M., Schmidt, M., Brolin, R., et al. (2024) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840.2024.2345711 · Cited by 2
Bilimsel Araştırma Makalesinde Giriş Bölümü Yazımı
Yeldan, İ., & Türkmen, E. (2024) · doi:10.5152/6905 · Cited by 2
Judith Butler’s theoretical perspectives within a nursing context—a scoping review
Hillestad, A. H., Petersen, E. K., Roos, M. C., et al. (2024) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/09697330241257569 · Cited by 2
Denham, A. M. J., Haracz, K., Bird, M., Bonevski, B., Spratt, N. J., Turner, A., Chow, W., Larkin, M., Mabotuwana, N. S., & Janssen, H. (2024) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2024.2360648 · Cited by 2
“Records from the databases were first extracted into Endnote 12, software designed for data management [53].”
Shah, S. N., Monuteaux, M. C., & Neuman, M. I. (2024) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.15006 · Cited by 3
“12,13 Covidence is a web-based collaboration software platform that streamlines the production of systematic and other literature reviews.”
Lisik, D., Milani, G. P., Salisu, M., Ermiş, S. S. Ö., Goksör, E., Basna, R., Wennergren, G., Kankaanranta, H., & Nwaru, B. I. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080263 · Cited by 2
“30 The de-duplicated records will subsequently be screened by pairs of reviewers (DL and GM, DL and MS, and DL and SSÖE) working independently using the Rayyan (https://rayyan.ai) web platform.”
MethodBuser, J. M., Auma, A. G., August, E. T., Rana, G., Gray, R., Jacobson‐Davies, F. E., Tufa, T. H., Endale, T., Mukeshimana, M., & Smith, Y. R. (2024) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003789 · Cited by 2
Home use of mifepristone for medical abortion: a systematic review
Gemzell‐Danielsson, K., Lindh, I., Brynhildsen, J., et al. (2024) · BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health · doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202302 · Cited by 2
Proposed Quality Metrics for Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia: A Scoping Review
Brown, M. L., Dorste, A., Adams, P. S., Caplan, L. A., Gleich, S. J., Hernandez, J. L., & Riegger, L. Q. (2024) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000007208 · Cited by 2
Offringa, T. M., Nooteboom, L. A., Versluijs, B. K., & Vermeiren, R. R. J. M. (2024) · Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.2989/17280583.2024.2398061 · Cited by 2
Ayas, M., Muzaffar, J., Phillips, V., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13226996 · Cited by 2
“Results were imported to Endnote 21 by VP for deduplication, using the method outlined by Bramer et al. [18].”
Arumí-Trujillo, C., Verdejo-Amengual, F. J., Martínez-Navarro, O., Vink, J. J. T., & Valenzuela‐Pascual, F. (2024) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2024.103141 · Cited by 3
Ataman, R., Alhasani, R., Auneau-Enjalbert, L., Quigley, A., Michael, H. U., & Ahmed, S. (2025) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02722-x · Cited by 2
What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review
Robbrecht, M., Winckel, M. V., Mulder, A., & Embo, M. P. C. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7 · Cited by 2
Färnqvist, K., Mälberg, K., Johar, A. M., Schandl, A. R., Olsén, M. F., & Lagergren, P. (2025) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01089-3 · Cited by 2
“Deduplication was performed as described by Bramer et al. [23].”
KEMMLER, W. K., von Stengel, S., & Uder, M. (2025) · Studia sportiva · doi:10.5817/sts2025-1-10 · Cited by 2
Measures of the Availability and Accessibility of Behavioral Health Services: A Scoping Review
Hooley, C., Adams, D. R., Wendt, C. L. E., & Dennis, C. B. (2025) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.20240282 · Cited by 2
Gong, M., Li, X., Xin, R., Ma, Y., Wu, X., Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., & Zhu, B. (2025) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2521443 · Cited by 3
“The results were exported and deduplicated in EndNote X9 using Bramer’s method [19].”
Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review
Xia, X., Duffner, L. A., Bintener, C., Bradshaw, A. C., Lamirel, D., & Jönsson, L. (2025) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.1177/13872877251351630 · Cited by 3
Almomani, E. A. H., Putten, V., van Mastrigt, G. A. P. G., et al. (2025) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2025.2542285 · Cited by 2
“The search results were imported from each database into EndNote 20.3 and de-duplicated using the method determined by Bramer and colleagues [33].”
InfluentialBuclin, C. P., Bürgisser, N., Berner, A., Juillerat, A., Blanc, C., Coen, M., Farhoumand, P. D., Porto, V., Porzi, J., Reny, J., et al. (2025) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-025-09843-6 · Cited by 2
Golay, H. G., Mlakar, S. J., Mlakar, V., Nava, T., & Ansari, M. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20163889 · Cited by 2
“As this review was not completely systematic for the reasons previously explained, we decided against running a thorough de-duplication algorithm [301]#.”
MethodO’Reilly, M., Hu, Y.-W. E., Gruber, J., Jones, D. M., Daniel, A., Marra, J., & Fraser, J. J. (2022) · The Physician and Sportsmedicine · doi:10.1080/00913847.2022.2135973 · Cited by 2
“Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science (including Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Sciences Citation Index), and CINAHL were queried on 31 December 2019 and again on 31 January 2022 for CPGs, consensus statements, position statements, and practice alerts published at any time, and duplicates were removed using EndNote…”
MethodReference Ranges for Vermis Biometry on Prenatal Ultrasound: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rosenbloom, J. I., Yaeger, L., & Porat, S. (2021) · Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound · doi:10.1055/a-1408-1998 · Cited by 2
“A total of 964 results were found and 299 duplicate records were deleted after using the de-duplication processes described in “ De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote ” resulting in a total of 665 unique citations being included in the project library [39].”
MethodPreuss, F. R., Eble, S. K., Peebles, A. M., et al. (2021) · JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques · doi:10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.11.004 · Cited by 2
A review analysis of global Bluetongue virus-related research articles from 2000 to 2020
Alzuheir, I. (2022) · Al-mağallaẗ al-ʻirāqiyyaẗ li-l-ʻulūm al-bayṭariyyaẗ/Iraqi journal of veterinary sciences · doi:10.33899/ijvs.2021.130222.1770 · Cited by 2
“EndNote program was used to check for article duplication (20).”
MethodOccupational Therapy Interventions for Poststroke Fatigue: A Scoping Review
Smetheram, T., Amiama, M. E., Hébert, D., Law, G., & DAWSON, D. R. (2022) · OTJR Occupational Therapy Journal of Research · doi:10.1177/15394492221087968 · Cited by 2
“Articles of interest were first imported to EndNote to remove duplicates using the Bramer method (Bramer et al., 2016).”
MethodLarkin, J., Whyte, E., & Thomas, S. G. (2022) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2022.2026425 · Cited by 2
“3.3 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA), and duplicates were removed before processing as described by Bramer et al. (Bramer et al., 2016).”
MethodInfluentialRøynesdal, Ø. B., Magnus, J. H., & Moen, A. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/35878 · Cited by 2
“Using the reference management software EndNote, we will collate and organize all studies extracted per database [30] and use the integrated algorithm in EndNote to screen for duplicate references [31].”
MethodIntimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review
Li, Y., Zhou, K., Tang, S., & Chen, J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20021541 · Cited by 2
“Study Screening Endnote [28] is being used to manage reference filtering.”
MethodResearch on vaginal dabbing: A systematic scoping review
Amzat, J., Kanmodi, K. K., & Egbedina, E. A. (2023) · Reproductive Female and Child Health · doi:10.1002/rfc2.23 · Cited by 2
Althans, A. R., Byrd, T., Suppok, R., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074118 · Cited by 2
Polesie, S., Alinaghi, F., & Egeberg, A. (2023) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2023.2281261 · Cited by 2
“A standard method was used to identify and remove duplicates (18).”
MethodHarper, A. E., Chen, Y. T., Tancer, S., Rodgers, K. R., Crumb, A. D., Townsend, W. A., Knight, J. S., & Murphy, S. L. (2023) · Lupus · doi:10.1177/09612033231223336 · Cited by 2
“34 The complete search strategies are available in Supplementary Appendix B. Citations were managed using EndNote (Clarivate Analytics, Boston, MA) prior to screening and Zotero (Corporation for Digital Scholarship, Vienna, VA) during manuscript development.”
MethodMasinde, M. (2024) · IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) · doi:10.23919/ist-africa63983.2024.10569979 · Cited by 4
van Eijck, S. C., Vugts, M. M. J., Janssen, R. P. A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1002/jeo2.12094 · Cited by 2
“Duplicate articles were removed in Endnote following the method of Bramer et al. [7].”
MethodAlmossawi, O., Friend, A. J., Palla, L., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046794 · Cited by 2
Endalamaw, A., Gilks, C. F., Ambaw, F., Chatfield, M. D., & Assefa, Y. A. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.07.10.23292462 · Cited by 2
Johansson, T., Chambers, R. L., Curtis, T., Pask, S., Greenley, S. L., Brittain, M., Bone, A. E., Laidlaw, L., Okamoto, I., Barclay, S. I. G., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.30.23294814 · Cited by 2
Hansen, J. B., Humble, C. A. S., Møller, A. M., & Vester‐Andersen, M. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2021.2024250 · Cited by 1
“2, Web of Science Group, Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia) and duplicates were removed [18].”
BackgroundKokorelias, K. M., Abdelhalim, R., Saragosa, M., Nelson, M. L. A., Singh, H. K., & Munce, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293329 · Cited by 1
Network governance in Healthcare, a systematic literature review
Maris, A., Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Ravesteijn, P., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2023) · European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ECMLG) · doi:10.34190/ecmlg.19.1.1798 · Cited by 1
Romano, D. R., Sindhar, S., Yaeger, L., et al. (2024) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000539513 · Cited by 1
“Duplicates were removed manually by the authors, automatically by the Covidence software, and via the EndNote-based method described by Bramer et al. [13].”
Freedman, D., Sawicka, K. M., Oh, J., Main, E., Campbell, K., & Feinstein, A. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074929 · Cited by 1
Bilimsel Araştırma Makalesinde Metot Bölümü Yazımı
Mutlu, E. K., & Şenel, A. (2024) · doi:10.5152/6906 · Cited by 1
Nitelikli Bilimsel Araştırma Makalesi Nasıl Yazılır?
Şenel, A., Çalgi, B., Boz, C., Mutlu, E. K., Tarakçı, E., Doğan, E. N. K., Türkmen, E., Çavdar, F. A., Gülüstan, F., Güzeldere, H. K. B., et al. (2024) · doi:10.5152/6900 · Cited by 1
Althans, A. R., Byrd, T., Suppok, R., et al. (2024) · Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education · doi:10.1007/s44186-024-00269-y · Cited by 1
“Studies identified on initial search as described above were exported to an EndNote library (Clarivate) and subsequently to DistillerSR (Version 2.37, Evidence Partners, 2022) after removal of duplicate records using the Bramer method [19].”
InfluentialFrisk, M. K., Lisik, D., & Zou, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Sleep · doi:10.3389/frsle.2024.1400562 · Cited by 2
Alamouti-fard, E., Garg, P., Yazji, J. H., Brigham, T., Jacob, S., Wadiwala, I. J., & Pham, S. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1414444 · Cited by 1
Carmel, J., Clerc, D., Couture, V., Reid, I., Filali, A., & Villalpando, J. M. (2024) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/wad.0000000000000644 · Cited by 1
“13 We also used the software Covidence to facilitate the screening process.”
Postintubation Sedation of Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department
Wynia, E., Baumgartner, K. T., Yaeger, L., et al. (2025) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000003325 · Cited by 1
Lipidomic Expression Analysis in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease: A Systematic Review
Polania-Sandoval, C. A., Byeon, S. K., Hartwell, J., et al. (2025) · Annals of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.063 · Cited by 1
Ayas, M., Muzaffar, J., Phillips, V., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318218 · Cited by 1
“Results were imported to Endnote 20 by VP for deduplication, using the method outlined by Bramer et al. [13].”
Smart, B. D., Kalathil, K., McCall, W. V., Munjal, S., Kirkendall, H., Patel, M., Taliaferro, A. R., Yaeger, L., & Iltis, A. S. (2025) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-025-09940-8 · Cited by 1
Villacorta, R., Gallagher‐Colombo, S. M., Lahiji, A., Myers, S., Briggs, J. A., & Phalguni, A. (2025) · Future Oncology · doi:10.1080/14796694.2025.2481022 · Cited by 1
Park, S. Y., Kim, Y., Katapodi, M. C., Kim, Y.-J., Chae, H., Choi, Y., Ryu, K. H., Lee, E., Kong, S., & Jung, S.-Y. (2025) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.gim.2025.101424 · Cited by 1
Building inclusive rehabilitation education: A scoping review protocol on EDI approaches and impact
Kokorelias, K. M., Chau, V., Boutros, H. M., Wijekoon, S., Singh, H., Kalu, M. E., & Harris, M. T. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322110 · Cited by 1
“We will collect and store the bibliographic details of all included sources using EndNote [23].”
Twenty-Four-Hour Movement Behaviors and Social Functions in Neurodiverse Children: A Scoping Review
Fan, C., Liu, P., Yang, Z., et al. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15050592 · Cited by 1
“All retained studies were included in a tool called the Systematic Review Accelerator (SRA) online to screen the literature for duplicate content (Bramer et al., 2016), available at https://sr-accelerator.com/#/ (accessed on 3 January 2025).”
VanMeeter, M., Kugley, S., Dierksheide, E., et al. (2025) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108350 · Cited by 1
Schemitsch, G. W., Carroll, P., Henry, P. J., et al. (2025) · Shoulder & Elbow · doi:10.1177/17585732251345077 · Cited by 1
“16 The Boolean search terms were: ‘ shoulder joint ’ or ‘ shoulder ’ or glenohumeral ’ or ‘ glenoid fossa ’ or ‘ scapula ’ or ‘ humerus ’ or ‘ humeral ’ or ‘ arthroplasty ’ or ‘ hemiarthroplasty ’ or ‘ orthopaedic procedures ’ or ‘ joint prosthesis ’ or ‘ metal-on-metal joint prosthesis ’ or ‘…”
Baniak, L. M., Guttormson, J., Costa, D. K., Lyons, M. M., McSparron, J. I., Klein‐Fedyshin, M., Brodie, D., Lane-Fall, M. B., Han, F., Penzel, T., et al. (2025) · Annals of the American Thoracic Society · doi:10.1513/annalsats.202502-221st · Cited by 1
“Search results were downloaded into EndNote (Clarivate Analytics) with the source and count speci fi ed, and duplicates were removed using methods developed by Bramer and colleagues (7, 8).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Bramer, W. M., Giustini, D., de Jonge, G. B., Holland, L., & Bekhuis, T.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Southern College of Optometry (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 240-243
- ISSN
- 1536-5050 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9439
- PMC
- PMC4915647
- OpenAlex
- W2471940872
- Cited by
- 2,103
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 346 · 2025: 333 · 2024: 419 · 2023: 340 · 2022: 252 · 2021: 218 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Keywords
- data deduplication, duplicate records, database search results, systematic reviews, EndNote, information professionals, bibliographic databases
- MeSH terms
- Review Literature as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic, Information Storage and Retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
