The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows Measured Using the Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer and Chamber Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Our study compared methane (CH4) emissions from lactating dairy cows measured using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer and open-circuit respiration chamber techniques. The study was conducted using 16 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows. In each chamber, the cow was fitted with the SF6 tracer apparatus to measure total CH4 emissions, including emissions from the rectum. Fresh ryegrass pasture was harvested daily and fed ad libitum to each cow with a supplement of 5 kg of grain/d. The CH4 emissions measured using the SF6 tracer technique were similar to those using the chamber technique: 331 vs. 322 g of CH4/d per cow. The accuracy of the SF6 tracer technique was indicated by considering the ratio of the CH4 emission measured using the SF6 tracer to the emission measured using the chamber for each cow on each day. The calculated ratio of 102.3% (SE = 1.51) was not different from 100%. A higher variability within cow between days was found for the SF6 tracer technique [coefficient of variation (CV) = 6.1%] than for the chamber technique (CV = 4.3%). The variability among cows was substantially higher than within cows, and was higher for the SF6 technique (CV = 19.6%) than for the chamber technique (CV = 17.8%). Our CH4 emission data were compared with whole-animal chamber studies conducted in Canada and Ireland. In the Canadian study the SF6 technique did not measure CH4 emissions from the rectum and emissions were 8% lower than those measured using the chamber, indicating that emissions from the rectum may be greater than previously measured (1%). The relationship between CH4 emission and dry matter intake was examined for our data and for that reported in the Canadian study. There was a difference in the slopes of the regressions derived from our data and that from Canada; 17.1 vs. 20.8 g of CH4/kg of dry matter intake. A difference between the 2 locations was expected based on the difference in diet composition for these 2 studies. The SF6 tracer technique is reasonably accurate for inventory purposes and for evaluating the effects of mitigation strategies on CH4 emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Cooper, R. N., Houghton, J. T., McCarthy, J. J., & Metz, B. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033020 · Cited by 12,889
Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants
Blaxter, K. L., & Clapperton, J. L. (1965) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19650046 · Cited by 925
Johnson, K., Huyler, M., Westberg, H., Lamb, B., & Zimmerman, P. (1994) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00051a025 · Cited by 528
Methane Production in Dairy Cows
Moe, P. W., & Tyrrell, H. F. (1979) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83465-7 · Cited by 404
Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep
Murray, R. M., Bryant, A. M., & Leng, R. A. (1976) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19760053 · Cited by 268
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis.
Kemp, C. D., & Silverman, B. W. (1987) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348849 · Cited by 252
Methane emissions measured directly from grazing livestock in New Zealand
Lassey, K. R., Ulyatt, M. J., Martin, R. J., Walker, C. F., & David Shelton, I. (1997) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00123-4 · Cited by 185
McGinn, S. M., Beauchemin, K. A., Iwaasa, A. D., & McAllister, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0054 · Cited by 104
Self-citationBoadi, D. A., Wittenberg, K. M., & Kennedy, A. D. (2002) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a01-054 · Cited by 91
Cited by
Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome
Shi, W., Moon, C. D., Leahy, S. C., Kang, D., Froula, J., Kittelmann, S., Fan, C., Deutsch, S., Gagic, D., Seedorf, H., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.168245.113 · Cited by 414
Grainger, C., Clarke, T., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., McGinn, S. M., Waghorn, G. C., & Eckard, R. J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08110 · Cited by 293
Self-citationAspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle
ELLIS, J. L., DIJKSTRA, J., KEBREAB, E., BANNINK, A., ODONGO, N. E., McBRIDE, B. W., & FRANCE, J. (2008) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859608007752 · Cited by 274
Min, B. R., Solaiman, S., Waldrip, H. M., Parker, D., Todd, R. W., & Brauer, D. (2020) · Animal nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.002 · Cited by 159
Olijhoek, D. W., Hellwing, A. L. F., Grevsen, K., Haveman, L. S., Chowdhury, M. R., Løvendahl, P., Weisbjerg, M. R., Noel, S. J., Højberg, O., Wiking, L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-16329 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S. M., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., Hannah, M. C., Waghorn, G. C., Clark, H., & Eckard, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2755-2766
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963781488
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows Measured Using the Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer and Chamber Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.2006-697
- The paper
- Grainger, C., Clarke, T., McGinn, S. M., Auldist, M. J., Beauchemin, K. A., Hannah, M. C., Waghorn, G. C., Clark, H., & Eckard, R. J. (2007). Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows Measured Using the Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Tracer and Chamber Techniques. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.