Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 925

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants

Open access
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L.·1965·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Metabolizable energy is defined as the heat of combustion of a feed less the heat of combustion of the faeces, urine and gases which are produced when it is eaten.The losses of energy in faeces and urine can be determined easily in sheep and cattle kept in metabolism cages, but to determine the energy they lose as combustible gas, that is as methane, involves quantitative measurement of the gaseous exchange and the use of much more complex and expensive equipment.Understandably, several attempts have been made to predict the losses of energy as methane by cattle and sheep from knowledge of the amount and type of the food they ingest (Kriss, 1930; Bratzler & Forbes, 1940; Swift, Bratzler, James, Tillman & Meek, 1948; Axelsson, 1949).During the course of calorimetric experiments at this Institute many thousands of determinations of methane production by sheep and cattle during 24 h periods have been made.These observations have been used to extend an earlier analysis of the relation between methane production and the type and amount of the diet (Blaxter, 1961). M E T H O D SMethane production was determined using closed-circuit respiration equipment (Wainman & Blaxter, 1958a, b) in which the CO, and H,O produced were absorbed continuously, the 0, consumed replaced continuously and the CH, produced allowed to accumulate.From the volume of the chamber, the estimated volume of the animal, the barometric pressure, and the air temperature and humidity, the total volume of gas in the chamber at s.t.p. was calculated at the beginning and end of each day.CH, concentration was determined in samples of gas taken at these times and CH, production estimated as the difference between the final and initial volumes of CH, at s.t.p.The calorific value of I 1. CH, was taken to be 9.44 kcal throughout.In May 1964 this factor was changed, as the result of a recommendation by Professor Brouwer, to 9.45 kcal (see Brouwer, 1965).Gas analysis for CH, until 1959 was by the Haldane method, in which the gas sample was burned in a gas pipette, and the total contraction in volume and the CO, production were determined.After 1959, CH, was determined in gas samples, after removal of water vapour and of CO,, by burning the CH, and measuring by thermal conductivity methods the amount of CO, formed.The instrument used (Cambridge Instrument Company) was calibrated each day using standard CH,-free and CH,-containing gas mixtures, stored in cylinders.Hydrogen, which on rare occasions arises in metabolic experiments with ruminants

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19650046

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 925

Metadata

Authors
Blaxter, K. L., & Clapperton, J. L.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
1965-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
511-522
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2023278887
Cited by
925
References
0
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19650046
The paper
Blaxter, K. L., & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19650046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.