The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations
Open accessAbstract
Failure of passive transfer of immunity (FPT) in dairy replacement calves has been linked to increased neonatal morbidity and mortality and long-term decreases in productivity. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of FPT in US dairy heifer calves in 2007 and to use nationally representative data to investigate associations of FPT with colostrum and calf management practices. A cross-sectional study was conducted by the USDA's National Animal Health Monitoring System between January and August 2007. Producers from 394 operations in 17 states completed survey questions about colostrum and calf management practices, and serum samples were collected from 1,816 healthy heifer calves on those operations. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels were determined by radial immunodiffusion, and calves were classified as having FPT if the IgG concentration was less than 10 mg/mL. To investigate associations between FPT and management practices, a multivariable analysis was completed using a weighted logistic regression model. The estimated prevalence of FPT in US dairy heifer calves was 19.2%. The odds of FPT were higher for calves on operations that pooled colostrum [odds ratio (OR = 2.2)], allowed nursing (OR = 2.4), or hand fed colostrum more than 4 h after birth (OR = 2.7). The odds of FPT were also higher for calves on operations that did not provide a source of heat during cold weather for calves experiencing a dystocia (OR = 1.6), would not seek veterinary assistance when unable to correctly position a calf for delivery (OR = 2.6), or did not routinely monitor serum proteins in calves as a measure of passive transfer (OR = 13.8). The prevalence of FPT in dairy heifer calves has decreased in the last 15 yr, so progress has been made in this important area of calf management. This study identified several management practices associated with FPT that could be targeted for educational campaigns or further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle
Bielmann, V., Gillan, J., Perkins, N. R., Skidmore, A. L., Godden, S., & Leslie, K. E. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2943 · Cited by 301
Renaud, D. L., Waalderbos, K. M., Beavers, L., Duffield, T. F., Leslie, K. E., & Windeyer, M. C. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17397 · Cited by 42
Masmeijer, C., Deprez, P., van Leenen, K., De Cremer, L., Cox, E., Devriendt, B., & Pardon, B. (2021) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105251 · Cited by 33
Development of a welfare assessment protocol for dairy calves from birth through to weaning
Barry, J., Kennedy, E., Sayers, R., de Boer, I., & Bokkers, E. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.7120/09627286.28.3.331 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Beam, A. L., Lombard, J. E., Kopral, C. A., Garber, L. P., Winter, A. L., Hicks, J. A., & Schlater, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3973-3980
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044494169
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.2009-2225
- The paper
- Beam, A. L., Lombard, J. E., Kopral, C. A., Garber, L. P., Winter, A. L., Hicks, J. A., & Schlater, J. L. (2009). Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.