Cited by 55Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsMicrobial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunology

Short communication: Ultrasonographic assessment of the thorax as a fast technique to assess pulmonary lesions in dairy calves with bovine respiratory disease

Open access
Buczinski, S., Forté, G., Bélanger, A.M.·2013·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess inter- and intraoperator agreement when assessing lung consolidation secondary to bovine respiratory disease (BRD) by thoracic ultrasonography. Ten calves were blindly assessed by 3 operators with varying expertise in thoracic ultrasound to look for lung consolidation and the presence of comet-tail artifacts (COMT). Systematic ultrasonography of the thorax was performed using an 18-site per side assessment with a linear 8.5-MHz probe. The status of the calves [healthy (n=4) vs. treated for BRD (n=6)] was not known by the operators. The interoperator kappa agreement for detecting consolidation was moderate to almost perfect (from 0.6 to 1.0) depending on the operator's experience (diagnosis of consolidation if depth ≥1cm). The intraclass correlation coefficient for consistency was 0.71 for a single measurement and 0.88 for average measurement. The intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement was 0.73 for single measurements and 0.89 for average measurements. These values were considered good for single measurements and excellent for average measurements. Systematic ultrasonography of the thorax can be used routinely to assess lung consolidation in dairy calves and can therefore be of importance, especially for assessment of subclinical BRD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2013-6577

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buczinski, S., Forté, G., & Bélanger, A. M.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Buczinski, S.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2013-07
Volume
96
Issue
7
Pages
4523-4528
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097350732
Cited by
55
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, dairy calves, thoracic ultrasound, lung consolidation, comet-tail artifact, inter-operator agreement, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Dairying, Female, Lung Diseases, ROC Curve, Thorax, Ultrasonography, Observer Variation, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review