Cited by 130Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Natural lactic acid bacteria population of tropical grasses and their fermentation factor analysis of silage prepared with cellulase and inoculant

Open access
Khota, Waroon, Pholsen, Suradej, Higgs, David, Cai, Yimin·2016·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Natural lactic acid bacteria (LAB) populations in tropical grasses and their fermentation characteristics on silage prepared with cellulase enzyme and LAB inoculants were studied. A commercial inoculant Lactobacillus plantarum Chikuso 1 (CH), a local selected strain Lactobacillus casei TH14 (TH14), and 2 cellulases, Acremonium cellulase (AC) and Maicelase (MC; Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), were used as additives to silage preparation with fresh and wilted (6 h) Guinea grass and Napier grass. Silage was prepared using a laboratory-scale fermentation system. Treatments were CH, TH14, AC at 0.01% fresh matter, AC 0.1%, MC 0.01%, MC 0.1%, CH+AC 0.01%, CH+AC 0.1%, CH+MC 0.01%, CH+MC 0.1%, TH14+AC 0.1%, TH14+AC 0.01%, TH14+MC 0.1%, and TH14+MC 0.01%. Microorganism counts of Guinea grass and Napier grass before ensiling were 10 2 LAB and 10 6 aerobic bacteria; these increased during wilting. Based on morphological and biochemical characteristics, and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, natural strains from both grasses were identified as L. plantarum , L. casei , Lactobacillus acidipiscis , Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides , Leuconostoc garlicum , Weissella confusa , and Lactococcus lactis . Lactobacillus plantarum and L. casei are the dominant species and could grow at lower pH and produce more lactic acid than the other isolates. Crude protein and neutral detergent fiber were 5.8 and 83.7% of dry matter (DM) for Guinea grass, and 7.5 and 77.1% of DM for Napier grass. Guinea grass had a low level of water-soluble carbohydrates (0.39% of DM). Guinea grass silage treated with cellulase had a lower pH and higher lactic acid content than control and LAB treatments. The 0.1% AC and MC treatments had the best result for fermentation quality. All high water-soluble carbohydrate (2.38% DM) Napier grass silages showed good fermentation quality. Compared with control and LAB-inoculated silage, the cellulase-treated silages had significantly higher crude protein content and lower neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber contents. The results confirmed that cellulase could improve tropical silage quality, inhibiting protein degradation and promoting fiber degradation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2016-11180

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improvements were observed when fibrolytic enzymes were added to mixtures of low-WSC barley straw and corn silage at ensiling, as well as to high-moisture, low-WSC tropical forages.

    “Similarly, improvements were observed when fibrolytic enzymes were added to mixtures of low-WSC barley straw and corn silage at ensiling (Guo et al., 2014), as well as to high-moisture, low-WSC tropical forages (Khota et al., 2016).”

    From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Khota et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 130

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cai, Y. 2004. Analysis method for silage. In Japanese Society of Grassland Science (ed.), Field and Laboratory Methods for Grassland Science. Tosho Printing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. 279-282.
  2. Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedure of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA.

Authors
Khota, W., Pholsen, S., Higgs, D., & Cai, Y.
Affiliations
  • Khon Kaen University (TH)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Pholsen, Suradej
  • Cai, Yimin
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2016-12
Volume
99
Issue
12
Pages
9768-9781
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2531042061
Cited by
130
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
19.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
PhD Scholarship, KhonKaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, silage fermentation, tropical grasses, Panicum maximum, Pennisetum purpureum, cellulase, silage inoculants, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, water-soluble carbohydrates, fermentation quality, silage additives, 16S rRNA identification
MeSH terms
Animals, Cellulase, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fermentation, Lactobacillus, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Silage, Lactic Acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review