Cited by 59Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Tea saponin reduced methanogenesis in vitro but increased methane yield in lactating dairy cows

Open access
Guyader, J., Eugène, M., Doreau, M., Morgavi, D.P., Gérard, C., Martin, C.·2017·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The effect of tea saponin supplementation in the ruminant diet on methane emissions, rumen fermentation, and digestive processes is still under debate. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of this plant extract on methanogenesis, total-tract digestibility, and lactating performances of dairy cows. The work included 2 independent and successive experiments. First, the effect of 7 tea saponin doses (from 0 to 0.50 g/L) on methane emissions and protozoa concentrations was tested in 2 repeated in vitro batch culture incubations using bovine rumen contents as inoculum and a cereal mixture as substrate. After 18 h of incubation, total gas production and composition as well as rumen fermentation parameters and protozoa concentration were analyzed. Increasing dosage of the plant extract reduced methane production and protozoa concentration, with a maximum reduction of 29% for CH 4 (mL/g of substrate) and 51% for protozoa (10 5 /mL). Tea saponin did not affect volatile fatty acids concentration, but marginally decreased total gas production by 5% at the highest dose. Second, a 2-period crossover design experiment was carried out with 8 lactating dairy cows fed a basal diet (54% corn silage, 6% hay, and 40% pelleted concentrates on a dry matter basis) without (control) or with 0.52% tea saponin (TSP). Each experimental period lasted 5 wk. Animals were fed ad libitum during the first 3 wk of the period (wk 1, 2, and 3) and restricted (95% of ad libitum intake) during the last 2 wk (wk 4 and 5). Intake and milk production were recorded daily. Methane emissions were quantified using open chambers (2 d, wk 4). Total-tract digestibility and nitrogen balance were determined from total feces and urine collected separately (5 d, wk 5). Rumen fermentation parameters and protozoa concentration were analyzed from samples taken after morning feeding (1 d, wk 5). Milk production, dry matter intake, and feed efficiency were reduced with TSP (−18, −12, and −8%, respectively). As daily methane production (g/d) was not affected, methane emissions (g/kg of dry matter intake) increased by 14% with TSP. Total-tract digestibility and nitrogen balance were similar between diets, except for acid detergent fiber digestibility, which tended to be improved with TSP (+4 percentage units). Rumen fermentation parameters and protozoa concentration were relatively unchanged by diets. Under the conditions of this experiment, tea saponin is not efficient to reduce methane emissions from dairy cows.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2016-11644

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pinares-Patiño, C. S., C. Hunt, R. Martin, J. West, P. Lovejoy, and G. Waghorn. 2012. Chapter 1: New Zealand ruminant methane mea- surement centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North. Pages 9-28 in Technical Manual on Respiration Chamber Designs. C. S. Pinares- Patiño and G. Waghorn, ed. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand.

Authors
Guyader, J., Eugène, M., Doreau, M., Morgavi, D. P., Gérard, C., & Martin, C.
Affiliations
Université de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Martin, C.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2017-03
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
1845-1855
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2573028430
Cited by
59
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
tea saponin, methanogenesis, methane emissions, dairy cattle, rumen fermentation, rumen protozoa, total tract digestibility, nitrogen balance, milk production, feed efficiency, dietary supplementation, volatile fatty acids, acid detergent fiber digestibility, ruminant methane mitigation, lactation performance, feed restriction, in vitro batch culture
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Diet, Digestion, Female, Fermentation, Lactation, Methane, Milk, Rumen, Saponins, Tea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review