The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control
Open accessAbstract
The prevention and control of endemic pathogens within and between farms often depends on the adoption of best management practices. However, farmers regularly do not adopt recommended measures or do not enroll in voluntary disease control programs. This indicates that a more comprehensive understanding of the influences and extension tools that affect farmers' management decisions is necessary. Based on a review of relevant published literature, we developed recommendations to support policy-makers, industry representatives, researchers, veterinarians, and other stakeholders when motivating farmers to adopt best management practices, and to facilitate the development and implementation of voluntary prevention and control programs for livestock diseases. Farmers will make management decisions based on their unique circumstances, agricultural contexts, beliefs, and goals. Providing them with rational but universal arguments might not always be sufficient to motivate on-farm change. Implementation of recommended management practices is more likely if farmers acknowledge the existence of a problem and their responsibility to take action. The perceived feasibility and effectiveness of the recommended management strategy and sufficient technical knowledge further increase the likelihood of adequate adoption. Farmers will also weigh the expected advantages of a proposed change against the expected disadvantages, and these considerations often include internal drivers such as pride or the desire to conform with perceived standards. Extension tools and farmers' social referents (e.g., veterinarians, peers) not only provide technical information but also influence these standards. Whereas mass media have the potential to deliver information to a broad audience, more personal approaches such as participatory group learning or individual communication with farm advisors can enable the tailoring of recommendations to farmers' situations. Approaches that appeal to farmers' internal motivators or that unconsciously elicit the desired behavior will increase the success of the intervention. Collaboration among stakeholders, assisted by social scientists and communication specialists, is necessary to provide a context that facilitates on-farm change and transfers consistent messages across extension tools in the most effective way.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Influence : science and practice
Cialdini, R. B. (1985) · Cited by 3,581
Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673 · Cited by 2,136
A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change
Krebs, P., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (2010) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 · Cited by 854
Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare
Barkema, H. W., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Kastelic, J. P., Lam, T. J. G. M., Luby, C., Roy, J.-P., LeBlanc, S. J., Keefe, G. P., & Kelton, D. F. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9377 · Cited by 595
Self-citationAgricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities
Anderson, J. R. (2004) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkh013 · Cited by 577
Economic aspects of mastitis: New developments
Hogeveen, H., Huijps, K., & Lam, T. (2011) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2011.547165 · Cited by 565
Self-citationBurton, R. J. F. (2004) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001 · Cited by 500
Towards an Effective Health Interventions Design: An Extension of the Health Belief Model
Orji, R., Vassileva, J., & Mandryk, R. (2012) · Online Journal of Public Health Informatics · doi:10.5210/ojphi.v4i3.4321 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Stokstad, M., Klem, T. B., Myrmel, M., Oma, V. S., Toftaker, I., Østerås, O., & Nødtvedt, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00167 · Cited by 53
‘It's cheaper than a dead cow’: Understanding veterinary medicine use on dairy farms
Rees, G. M., Reyher, K. K., Barrett, D. C., & Buller, H. (2021) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.020 · Cited by 34
Borelli, E., Ellis, K., Tomlinson, M., & Hotchkiss, E. (2023) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-023-03625-0 · Cited by 23
Dear Diary: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Generative AI Coding Tools in the Workplace
Butler, J., Suh, J., Haniyur, S., & Hadley, C. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/ACM 47th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip66354.2025.00034 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritter, C., Jansen, J., Roche, S., Kelton, D. F., Adams, C. L., Orsel, K., Erskine, R. J., Benedictus, G., Lam, T. J. G. M., & Barkema, H. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3329-3347
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2589237773
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 61.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.2016-11977
- The paper
- Ritter, C., Jansen, J., Roche, S., Kelton, D. F., Adams, C. L., Orsel, K., Erskine, R. J., Benedictus, G., Lam, T. J. G. M., & Barkema, H. W. (2017). Invited review: Determinants of farmers' adoption of management-based strategies for infectious disease prevention and control. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.