Cited by 2,136Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions

Noar, Seth M., Benac, Christina N., Harris, Melissa S.·2007·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Although there is a large and growing literature on tailored print health behavior change interventions, it is currently not known if or to what extent tailoring works. The current study provides a meta-analytic review of this literature, with a primary focus on the effects of tailoring. A comprehensive search strategy yielded 57 studies that met inclusion criteria. Those studies-which contained a cumulative N = 58,454-were subsequently meta-analyzed. The sample size-weighted mean effect size of the effects of tailoring on health behavior change was found to be r = .074. Variables that were found to significantly moderate the effect included (a) type of comparison condition, (b) health behavior, (c) type of participant population (both type of recruitment and country of sample), (d) type of print material, (e) number of intervention contacts, (f) length of follow-up, (g) number and type of theoretical concepts tailored on, and (h) whether demographics and/or behavior were tailored on. Implications of these results are discussed and future directions for research on tailored health messages and interventions are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of personalization in health care and medicine have been increasing in number since the early 2000s, with growing evidence showing their effectiveness.

    “Studies of personalization in health care and medicine have been increasing in number since the early 2000s [22], with growing evidence showing their effectiveness [23-26].”
  • A recent meta-analysis of 57 studies of message- and material-focused behavior change interventions found that program tailoring, number of intervention contacts, and length of follow-up, among other factors, all significantly moderated intervention effects.

    “A recent meta-analysis of 57 studies of message- and material-focused behavior change interventions found that program tailoring (e.g., to the target population and context), number of intervention contacts, and length of follow-up, among other factors, all significantly moderated intervention effects (22).”
  • Meta-analytic findings show that tailoring can increase the effects of printed health behavior change interventions, although the effects of tailoring are moderated by type of health behavior.

    “This is supported by metaanalytic findings showing that tailoring can increase the effects of printed health behavior change interventions, although the effects of tailoring are moderated by type of health behavior (Noar, Benac, & Harris, 2007).”
  • The result of the current study lends some support to the notion that interventions may be more effective if targeted at an individual's current situation.

    “The result of the current study leads some support to the notion that interventions may be more effective if targeted at an individual's current situation (Noar et al., 2007).”
  • In computer-tailored interventions, tailoring showed the strongest effects when based on both theoretical concepts and user characteristics and performed via dynamic tailoring.

    “Similarly, in computer-tailored interventions, tailoring showed the strongest effects when based on both theoretical concepts (e.g. stages of change, decisional balance, attitudes) and user characteristics (Noar et al. 2007) and performed via dynamic tailoring, in which tailoring is continuously adjusted during the intervention (Krebs, Prochaska, & Rossi 2010).”

    From A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion (2014) · cites this paper as Noar et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2007
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
673-693
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2120742996
Cited by
2,136
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 183 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 150 · 2015: 168 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 97
FWCI
89.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Kentucky
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
tailoring, tailored health messages, health behavior change, effect size, follow-up duration
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Communication, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Teaching Materials, United States, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review