Cited by 30Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

The effect of individual versus pair housing of dairy heifer calves during the preweaning period on measures of health, performance, and behavior up to 16 weeks of age

Open access
Knauer, W.A., Godden, S.M., Rendahl, A.K., Endres, M.I., Crooker, B.A.·2021·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Pair housing of dairy heifer calves during the preweaning period helps meet the natural social needs of the calf and has been shown to improve growth and starter intake during the preweaning period as compared with individual housing. However, there is little evidence to suggest that pair-housed calves maintain their social and growth advantages past the weaning phase. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of pair housing on measures of calf performance, health, and behavior up to 16 wk of age. Healthy Holstein and crossbred heifer calves were enrolled in the study after colostrum feeding, with the first calf randomly assigned to 1 of 2 housing treatments: pair (PR; 2 hutches with common outdoor space) or individual (INDV; 1 hutch plus outdoor space). All calves were bucket fed 4 L of milk replacer twice daily and weaned at 50 d of age. Weaned calves (6/group) remained with their treatment group until exit from the study at 16 wk. A venous blood sample was collected from each calf between 24 h and 7 d of age to test for serum total protein (g/dL). Body weights (kg) were obtained at birth, weaning, and 16 wk. Each enrolled calf was scored for health each week and calf health treatments were also collected. A hair sample was collected from the left shoulder at birth and 16 wk to assess hair cortisol (pg/mL). At enrollment, each calf was fitted with a triaxial accelerometer on the left hind leg for continuous recording of standing and lying time (min/24 h) for 16 wk. Latency to find feed, water, and lie down (min) at entrance to the weaned pen were recorded by continuous video observation. Open field testing with a novel object was performed at 5, 10, and 16 wk. Behaviors analyzed by video observation included latency to approach the object (s), vocalizations (n), and time spent immobile, walking, or running (s/10 min). Linear mixed models were used to determine the effect of treatment (INDV or PR) on calf growth, activity, and behavioral outcomes, which accounted for time, breed, the interaction of time and treatment, the random pen, and variability in testing day and repeated measurements within calf when appropriate. Twenty-four Holstein and crossbred calves (PR: n = 12, 6 pairs; INDV: n = 12) were enrolled from November 2 to December 23, 2018. The PR calves were 7.1 kg heavier at weaning and gained 0.15 kg/d more during the preweaning period as compared with INDV calves. In the 24 h after movement to the postweaning pen, PR calves lay down for longer periods of time (14.3 vs. 11.0 ± 0.4 h/d), and PR calves urinated more during novel object testing at 5 wk of age. Our study demonstrated benefits, such as better growth and increased lying time, of pair housing calves during the preweaning period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2020-18928

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method does not account for natural behavioral variations over time, such as the decrease in lying duration among aging calves within groups.

    “One limitation of these approaches is that the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method does not account for natural behavioral variations over time, such as the decrease in lying duration among aging calves within groups [255].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [255]

    The ‘Lying Time and Behavior at Weaned Pen Entry’ section reports that calves’ daily lying time decreased from week 1 to week 16. But the paper does not discuss CUSUM or establish that the method fails to account for this change. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Boissy, A., B. Claudia Terlouw, and A. Pierre Le Neindre. 1998. Pres- ence of cues from stressed conspecifics increases reactivity to aver- sive events in cattle: Evidence for the existence of alarm substanc- es in urine. Physiol. Behav. 63:489-495. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ S0031 -9384(97)00466 -6. · DOI
  2. Bolt, S. L., N. K. Boyland, D. T. Mlynski, R. James, and D. P. Croft. 2017. Pair housing of dairy calves and age at pairing: Effects on weaning stress, health, production and social networks. PLoS One 12:e0166926. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1371/ journal .pone .0166926. · DOI
  3. Broom, D. M., and J. D. Leaver. 1978. Effects of group-rearing or partial isolation on later social behavior of calves. Anim. Behav. 26:1255-1263. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ 0003 -3472(78)90116 -1. · DOI
  4. Costa, J. H. C., R. K. Meagher, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2015. Early pair housing increases solid feed intake and weight gains in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 98:6381-6386. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2015 -9395. · DOI
  5. Costa, J. H. C., M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2016. In- vited review: Effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. J. Dairy Sci. 99:2453-2467. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2015 -10144. · DOI
  6. de Paula Vieira, A., A. M. de Passille, and D. M. Weary. 2012b. Effects of the early social environment on behavioral responses of dairy calves to novel events. J. Dairy Sci. 95:5149-5155. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2011 -5073. · DOI
  7. de Paula Vieira, A., M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2010. Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behavior of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. J. Dairy Sci. 93:3079-3085. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2009 -2516. · DOI
  8. de Paula Vieira, A., M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2012a. Presence of an older weaned companion influences feed- ing behavior and improves performance of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. J. Dairy Sci. 95:3218-3224. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2011 -4821. · DOI
  9. Knauer et al.: EFFECTS OF PAIR HOUSING ON HEALTH AND BEHAVIOR Dellmeier, G. R., T. H. Friend, and E. E. Gbur. 1985. Comparison of four methods of calf confinement II: Behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1102-1109. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .2527/ jas1985 .6051102x. · DOI
  10. Fꜳrevik, G., K. Tjentland, S. Løvik, I. L. Andersen, and K. E. Bøe. 2008. Resting pattern and social behavior of dairy calves housed in pens with different sized lying areas. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114:54-64. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .applanim .2008 .01 .002. · DOI
  11. Finney, G., A. Gordon, G. Scoley, and S. J. Morrison. 2018. Validat- ing the IceRobotics IceQube tri-axial accelerometer for measuring daily lying duration in dairy calves. Livest. Sci. 214:83-87. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .livsci .2018 .05 .014. · DOI
  12. Gaillard, C., R. K. Meagher, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2014. Social housing improves dairy calves' performance in two cognitive tests. PLoS One. 9:e90205. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1371/ journal .pone .0090205. · DOI
  13. Hänninen, L., A. M. de Passille, and J. Rushen. 2005. The effect of flooring type and social grouping on the rest and growth of dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 91:193-204. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .applanim .2004 .10 .003. · DOI
  14. Heimbürge, S., E. Kanitz, and W. Otten. 2019. The use of hair cortisol for the assessment of stress in animals. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 270:10-17. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .ygcen .2018 .09 .016. · DOI
  15. Horvath, K. C., and E. K. Miller-Cushon. 2018. Characterizing so- cial behavior, activity, and associations between cognition and be- havior upon social grouping of weaned dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 101:7287-7296. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2018 -14545. · DOI
  16. Jensen, M. B., and L. E. Larsen. 2014. Effects of level of social con- tact on dairy calf behavior and health. J. Dairy Sci. 97:5035-5044. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2013 -7311. · DOI
  17. Jensen, M. B., A. M. de Passille, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and J. Rushen. 2008. A barrier can reduce competition over teats in pair-housed milk-fed calves. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1607-1613. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2007 -0623. · DOI
  18. Jensen, M. B., K. S. Vestergaard, C. C. Krohn, and L. Munksgaard. 1997. Effect of single vs. group housing and space allowance on responses of calves during open-field tests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:109-121. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ S0168 -1591(96)01183 -5. · DOI
  19. Lecorps, B., D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2018. Pes- simism and fearfulness in dairy calves. Sci. Rep. 8:1421. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1038/ s41598 -017 -17214 -3. · DOI
  20. Liu, S., J. Ma, J. Li, G. M. Alugongo, Z. Wu, Y. Wang, S. Li, and Z. Cao. 2019. Effects of pair versus individual housing on per- formance, health, and behavior of dairy calves. Animals (Basel) 10:50. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3390/ ani10010050. · DOI
  21. Losinger, W. C., and A. J. Heinrichs. 1997. Management practices associated with high mortality among preweaned dairy heifers. J. Dairy Res. 64:1-11. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1017/ S0022029996001999. · DOI
  22. Mattiello, S., M. Battini, G. De Rosa, F. Napolitano, and C. Dwyer. 2019. Review: How can we assess positive welfare in ruminants. Animals (Basel) 9:758. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3390/ ani9100758. · DOI
  23. McGuirk, S. 2008. Disease management of dairy calves and heifer. Vet Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 24:139-153.https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .cvfa .2007 .10 .003. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Meagher, R. K., R. R. Daros, J. H. C. Costa, M. A. G. von Keyser- lingk, M. J. Hotzel, and D. M. Weary. 2015. Effects of degree and timing of social housing on reversal learning and response to novel objects in dairy calves. PLoS One 10:e0132828. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1371/ journal .pone .0132828. · DOI
  25. Meyer, J. S., and M. A. Novak. 2012. Minireview: Hair cortisol: A novel biomarker of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical activ- ity. Endocrinology 153:4120-4127. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1210/ en .2012 -1226. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Miller-Cushon, E. K., and T. J. DeVries. 2016. Effect of social housing on the development of feeding behavior and social feeding prefer- ences of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 99:1406-1417. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2015 -9869. · DOI
  27. Neave, H. W., J. H. C. Costa, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Key- serlingk. 2018. Personality is associated with feeding behavior and performance in dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 101:7437-7449. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2017 -14248. · DOI
  28. Overvest, M. A., R. E. Crossley, E. K. Miller-Cushon, and T. J. DeVries. 2018. Social housing influences the behavior and feed in- take of dairy calves during weaning. J. Dairy Sci. 101:8123-8134. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2018 -14465. · DOI
  29. Pempek, J. A., M. L. Eastridge, and K. L. Proudfoot. 2017. The effect of a furnished individual hutch pre-weaning on calf behavior, re- sponse to novelty, and growth. J. Dairy Sci. 100:4807-4817. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2016 -12180. · DOI
  30. Pempek, J. A., M. L. Eastridge, S. S. Swartzwelder, K. M. Daniels, and T. T. Yohe. 2016. Housing system may affect behavior and growth performance of Jersey heifer calves. J. Dairy Sci. 99:569- 578. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2015 -10088. · DOI
  31. Rutherford, N. H., A. W. Gordon, G. Arnott, and F. O. Lively. 2019. The effect of calf jackets on the health, performance, and skin tem- perature of dairy origin beef calves. Transl. Anim. Sci. 4:316-323. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1093/ tas/ txz172. · DOI
  32. Solano, J., A. Orihuela, C. S. Galina, and V. Aguirre. 2007. A note on behavioral responses to brief cow-calf separation and reunion in cattle (Bos indicus). J. Vet. Behav. 2:10-14. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .jveb .2006 .12 .002. · DOI
  33. Svensson, C., and P. Liberg. 2006. Effect of group size on health and growth rate of Swedish dairy calves housed in pens with automatic milk-feeders. Prev. Vet. Med. 73:43-53. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .prevetmed .2005 .08 .021. · DOI
  34. Van Reenen, C. G., B. Engel, L. F. M. Ruis-Heutinck, J. T. N. Van der Werf, W. G. Buist, R. B. Jones, and H. J. Blokhuis. 2004. Behavioral reactivity of heifer calves in potentially alarming test situations: A multivariate and correlational analysis. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 85:11-30. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ j .applanim .2003 .09 .007. · DOI
  35. Veissier, I., A. Boissy, A. M. dePassille, J. Rushen, C. G. van Reenen, S. Roussel, S. Andanson, and P. Pradel. 2001. Calves' responses to repeated social regrouping and relocation. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2580- 2593. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .2527/ 2001 .79102580x. · DOI
  36. Webster, A. J. F., C. Saville, B. M. Church, A. Gnanasakthy, and R. Moss. 1985. The effect of different rearing systems on the develop- ment of calf behavior. Br. Vet. J. 141:249-264. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ 0007 -1935(85)90061 -2. · DOI
  37. Wells, S. J., D. A. Dargatz, and S. L. Ott. 1996. Factors associated with mortality to 21 days of life in dairy heifers in the United States. Prev. Vet. Med. 29:9-19. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .1016/ S0167 -5877(96)01061 -6. · DOI
  38. Whalin, L., D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2018. Short communication: Pair housing dairy calves in modified hutches. J. Dairy Sci. 101:5428-5433. https: / / doi .org/ 10 .3168/ jds .2017 -14361. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knauer, W. A., Godden, S. M., Rendahl, A. K., Endres, M. I., & Crooker, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Knauer, W.A.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2021-03
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
3495-3507
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3115419368
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
dairy heifer calves, pair housing, individual housing, pre-weaning period, social behavior, hair cortisol, stress, growth performance, body weight, calf health, activity patterns, novel object test, exploratory behavior, vocalizations, Holstein, weaning, triaxial accelerometer, open field test, animal welfare, dairy cattle production systems, milk replacer
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Cattle, Diet, Female, Housing, Animal, Milk, Pregnancy, Weaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review