CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 176Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsAnimal health and immunologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd

Open access
Suriyasathaporn, W., Schukken, Y.H., Nielen, M., Brand, A.·2000·Journal of Dairy Science
DOI 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74991-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A case-control study was conducted to evaluate factors measured at the udder inflammation-free state as risk factors for subsequent clinical mastitis. The factors including somatic cell count (SCC), body condition score, milk yield, percentages of milk fat and milk protein, and diseases were evaluated for their association with the results of udder inflammatory response. The results of the response were specified as presence (case) and absence (control) of clinical signs of mastitis. Data on Holstein Friesian cows calving from January 1984 to November 1996 from a commercial farm with low bulk milk SCC were used. Univariable and multivariable random-effect logistic models were used to evaluate the effect of those factors on the risk of clinical mastitis. The following variables were associated with increased odds of case versus control events in the univariable analysis: early lactation period, low SCC, high milk yield, high percentage of milk protein, high percentage of milk fat, low body condition score, retained placenta, and milk fever. For the final multivariable model of all variables used for analysis, only low SCC remained significantly associated with increased risk of subsequent clinical mastitis. The authors concluded that very low SCC during the udder inflammation-free state are associated with increased risk of clinical mastitis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74991-5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in the United States and Europe consistently report that approximately 40% of clinical cases are the result of Gram-negative bacteria.

    “The percentage distribution of Gram-negative bacteria causing clinical mastitis is herd dependant, but studies in the United States and Europe consistently report that appropriately 40% of clinical cases are the result of Gram-negative bacteria [25, 27, 55, 57].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]

  • The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria.

    “The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render the use of individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC as poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria [13, 20, 25, 57].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]

  • The rate of clinical cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria averages approximately 20 cases per 100 cows per year in these studies.

    “Rate of clinical cases caused by Gram-negative bacteria average approximately 20 cases per 100 cows per year in these studies.”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [57]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van Werven, T. 1999. The role of leukocytes in bovine Escherichia coli mastitis. Ph.D. thesis. University Utrecht.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Suriyasathaporn, W., Schukken, Y. H., Nielen, M., & Brand, A.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Khon Kaen University (TH)
Corresponding author
Suriyasathaporn, W.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher
American Dairy Science Association
Published
2000-06
Volume
83
Issue
6
Pages
1248-1255
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74991-5
OpenAlex
W2111241613
Cited by
172
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
24.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, risk factors, Holstein cows, udder inflammation, bulk tank milk, body condition score, milk yield, milk fat, milk protein, retained placenta, milk fever, early lactation, dairy herds
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cell Count, Female, Mammary Glands, Animal, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Risk Factors, Incidence, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review