The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feeding Behavior Identifies Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis
Open accessAbstract
Dairy cows experience a high incidence of disease and metabolic disorders in the weeks immediately following calving, but early and accurate diagnosis remains a challenge. Cows suffering from metritis, one common disease following calving, exhibit reduced milk yield and reproductive performance. However, afflicted cows show few overt signs of illness and frequently go unnoticed in the absence of veterinary examination. To determine whether changes in feeding behavior could be used to identify animals at risk for metritis, attendance at the feed alley was monitored continuously for 26 Holstein cows during the transition period, beginning 2 wk before and ending 3 wk after calving. Every 3 +/- 1 d, cows were examined for metritis based on rectal body temperature and condition of vaginal discharge. Over the 3 wk of observations after calving, 69% of cows showed some signs of metritis. These cows spent on average 22 min/d less time at the feed alley during the transition period than did non-metritic cows. For every 10-min decrease in average daily feeding time, cows were twice as likely to be diagnosed with metritis. A threshold of 75 min of average daily feeding time was 89% sensitive and 62% specific for detection of acute metritis. In conclusion, reduced time at the feeder can be used to identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. More research is required to determine how soon before calving at-risk cows can be identified and whether these behavioral differences can also be used in the early diagnosis of other diseases or metabolic disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental Mastitis: Cause, Prevalence, Prevention
Smith, K. L., Todhunter, D. A., & Schoenberger, P. S. (1985) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)80993-0 · Cited by 475
Quimby, W. F., Sowell, B. F., Bowman, J. G. P., Branine, M. E., Hubbert, M. E., & Sherwood, H. W. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a00-098 · Cited by 99
Cited by
Esposito, G., Irons, P. C., Webb, E. C., & Chapwanya, A. (2014) · Animal Reproduction Science · doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.11.007 · Cited by 586
González, L. A., Tolkamp, B. J., Coffey, M. P., Ferret, A., & Kyriazakis, I. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0530 · Cited by 324
Jackson, K. S., Carstens, G. E., Tedeschi, L. O., & Pinchak, W. E. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-9993 · Cited by 38
Use of pattern recognition techniques for early detection of morbidity in receiving feedlot cattle 1
Moya, D., Silasi, R., McAllister, T. A., Genswein, B., Crowe, T., Marti, S., & Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-8907 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Urton, G., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2843-2849
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122081132
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feeding Behavior Identifies Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72965-9
- The paper
- Urton, G., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2005). Feeding Behavior Identifies Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72965-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.