Cited by 273Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyGarlic and Onion Studies

Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation

Open access
Busquet, M., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Carro, M.D., Kamel, C.·2005·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Different concentrations (3, 30, 300, and 3000 mg/L of culture fluid) of garlic oil (GAR), diallyl sulfide (DAS), diallyl disulfide (DAD), allicin (ALL), and allyl mercaptan (ALM) were incubated for 24 h in diluted ruminal fluid with a 50:50 forage:concentrate diet (17.7% crude protein; 30.7% neutral detergent fiber) to evaluate their effects on rumen microbial fermentation. Garlic oil (30 and 300 mg/L), DAD (30 and 300 mg/L), and ALM (300 mg/L) resulted in lower molar proportion of acetate and higher proportions of propionate and butyrate. In contrast, at 300 mg/L, DAS only increased the proportion of butyrate, and ALL had no effects on volatile fatty acid proportions. In a dual-flow continuous culture of rumen fluid fed the same 50:50 forage:concentrate diet, addition of GAR (312 mg/L), DAD (31.2 and 312 mg/L), and ALM (31.2 and 312 mg/L) resulted in similar changes to those observed in batch culture, with the exception of the lack of effect of DAD on the proportion of propionate. In a third in vitro study, the potential of GAR (300 mg/L), DAD (300 mg/L), and ALM (300 mg/L) to decrease methane production was evaluated. Treatments GAR, DAD, and ALM resulted in a decrease in methane production of 73.6, 68.5, and 19.5%, respectively, compared with the control. These results confirm the ability of GAR, DAD, and ALM to decrease methane production, which may help to improve the efficiency of energy use in the rumen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73126-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have reported unfavorable effects of using essential oils as feed additives, depressing VFA synthesis by reducing feed degradability.

    “Some studies have also reported a few unfavorable effects of using EO as feed additives as they depressed synthesis of VFA by reducing feed degradability (234).”

    From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [234]

    The In Vitro Gas Production Trial and Discussion report that garlic oil and diallyl disulfide lowered both total VFA concentration and measures of feed digestibility. The paper does not establish that reduced digestibility caused the lower VFA concentration. Its Discussion also notes that, in continuous culture, allyl mercaptan lowered VFA without lowering digestibility. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 273

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Busquet, M., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel. 2004. Effects of different doses of plant extracts on rumen microbial fermenta- tion. J. Dairy Sci. 87(Suppl. 1):213. Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 88, No. 12, 2005
  2. Stern, M. D., and W. H. Hoover. 1990. The dual flow continuous culture system. Pages 17-32 in Proc. Continuous Culture Fer- mentors: Frustration or fermentation. Northwest ADSA-ASAS Regional Meeting, Chazy, NY. Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 88, No. 12, 2005

Authors
Busquet, M., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Carro, M. D., & Kamel, C.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universidad de León (ES)
Corresponding author
Calsamiglia, S.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2005-12
Volume
88
Issue
12
Pages
4393-4404
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081991646
Cited by
273
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Garlic and Onion Studies
Keywords
garlic oil, diallyl sulfide, diallyl disulfide, allicin, allyl mercaptan, rumen fermentation, volatile fatty acids, acetate, propionate, butyrate, methane production, energy use efficiency
MeSH terms
Allyl Compounds, Animals, Bacteria, Disulfides, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Fermentation, Methane, Rumen, Sulfides, Sulfinic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review