The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationships of Forage Compositions With Rates of Cell Wall Digestion and Indigestibility of Cell Walls
Open accessAbstract
Forage fiber digestion followed firstorder reaction kinetics even though individual forages differed widely in maturity, composition, and rate of fiber digestion.Linearity of individual semilog plots of remaining digestible cell walls on time and their individually high r z (mean ,978) for each of 112 different samples representing 15 species support this general model.Cell wall digestion rates were more highly correlated with soluble dry matter percentage (y = --.0299-b .00261X,r =.72, P < .001)than with ]ignin percentage (r = --.47,P < .001),lignin-to-cellulose (r = --.18),log lignin-to-cellulose ratio (r = --.26,P < .01),or 72 hr in vitro cell wall indigestibility (r = --.38,P < .001).Similarity of mean lignin-to-cellulose ratios in theoretically indigestible residues from legumes (1.09) and grasses (.94) suggests a similar role of lignin in limiting extent of digestion.Lignin in dry matter, lignin:cellulose, or log lignin:cellulose seem to be equally suitable predictors of cell wall indigestibility in vitro.Legumes were higher in percentage soluble dry matter and lignin and lower in percentage hemicellulose than grasses.Legume cell walls were also more lignified and less digestible, but digested faster than grass cell walls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Soest, P. J. (1965) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1965.243834x · Cited by 589
Cited by
Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows
Mertens, D. R. (1997) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76075-2 · Cited by 1,467
Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants.
Allen, M. S. (1996) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1996.74123063x · Cited by 555
The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro
Mertens, D. R., & Loften, J. R. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)83101-8 · Cited by 555
Stewart, E. K., Beauchemin, K. A., Dai, X., MacAdam, J. W., Christensen, R. G., & Villalba, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skz206 · Cited by 78
Alterações bromatológicas em soja e milho processados por extrusão
Bertipaglia, L. M. A., Melo, G. M. P. D., Sugohara, A., Melo, W. J. D., & Bertipaglia, L. A. (2008) · Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia · doi:10.1590/s1516-35982008001100016 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K., & Gordon, C. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1972-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1140-1147
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072091087
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships of Forage Compositions With Rates of Cell Wall Digestion and Indigestibility of Cell Walls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(72)85636-4
- The paper
- Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K., & Gordon, C. H. (1972). Relationships of Forage Compositions With Rates of Cell Wall Digestion and Indigestibility of Cell Walls. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(72)85636-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.