The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro
Open accessAbstract
Purified corn and wheat starch were added to alfalfa, Coastal bermudagrass, fescue, and orchardgrass hays at 0, 40, 60, and 80% of the total as-fed substrate, and fiber digestion kinetics were determined in vitro. Kinetics were estimated by the model R = Doe-k(t-L) + U where R is residue remaining at time t, Do is digestible fraction, k is digestion rate constant, L is discrete lag time, and U is indigestible fraction. Parameters of the model were estimated by logarithmic transformation and a direct nonlinear least squares procedure. Corn and wheat starch did not differ in their effect upon lag time of fiber digestion, digestion rate, or potential extent of digestion. Alfalfa had a shorter lag time of fiber digestion (.86 h) than Coastal bermudagrass (3.05 h), but not than orchardgrass or fescue (1.66 and 2.42 h). Orchardgrass differed in fiber digestion rate (.0542h-1) from Coastal bermudagrass (.0698h-1) but not from alfalfa or fescue (.0670 and .0658h-1). The potential extent of fiber digestion was similar for fescue (75.8%) and orchardgrass (76.0%). The potential extent of fibre digestion for alfalfa (50.9%) differed from Coastal bermudagrass (64.3%), and both of these forages differed from fescue or orchardgrass. Addition of starch resulted in a linear increase in lag time of fiber digestion, but digestion rate was not affected. Potential extent of digestion was decreased when starch was added.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SNEDECOR, G. W. (1939) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-193902000-00006 · Cited by 19,359
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
Association of Official Analytical Chemists: 1964–1988
Reynolds, H. L. (1989) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7086-4_3 · Cited by 6,147
Bain, L. J. (1967) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1967.10490452 · Cited by 3,407
Starch: Chemistry and Technology
(1984) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02983-3 · Cited by 3,261
(1966) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12555-x · Cited by 2,414
Starch chemistry and technology
Kennedy, J. F., & White, C. A. (1987) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/0144-8617(87)90058-0 · Cited by 717
Factors Affecting the Cellulolytic Activity of Rumen Contents
Stewart, C. S. (1977) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.33.3.497-502.1977 · Cited by 291
Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K., & Gordon, C. H. (1972) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(72)85636-4 · Cited by 237
Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion.
Dr, M. (1977) · PubMed · Cited by 217
Cited by
Weimer, P. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00296 · Cited by 487
Influence of Buffer pH and Raw Corn Starch Addition on In Vitro Fiber Digestion Kinetics
Grant, R. H., & Mertens, D. R. (1992) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)78039-4 · Cited by 220
Self-citationEvaluation of the nutritive value of kudzu (Pueraria lobata) as a feed for ruminants
Corley, R. N., Woldeghebriel, A., & Murphy, M. R. (1997) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00038-2 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Mertens, D. R., & Loften, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1437-1446
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112546227
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)83101-8
- The paper
- Mertens, D. R., & Loften, J. R. (1980). The Effect of Starch on Forage Fiber Digestion Kinetics In Vitro. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)83101-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.