The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen Requirement and Utilization in Dairy Cattle
Open accessAbstract
Formulation of dairy cow rations should consider the following points regarding nitrogen utilization by lactating cows. (a) Maintenance of ruminal ammonia nitrogen in excess of 5 mg/100 ml rumen fluid has no effect on microbial protein production. (b)Supplemental nonprotein nitrogen is not utilized in typical dairy and feedlot beef rations containing more than 12 to 13% crude protein(dry matter basis). (c)Nonprotein nitrogen is approximately equal to true protein as a source of nitrogen in typical dairy and feedlot rations containing not more than 12 to 13% crude protein. (d)A scheme based upon metabolizable protein (absorbable protein) for calculating requirements and comparing protein sources is superior to crude or digestible protein designations. Ultimate expression of the requirement may be in terms of crude protein for the sake of simplicity. (e)One kilogram of crude protein, regardless of nitrogen source, equals about .75kg metabolizable protein in typical dairy and feedlot beef rations containing not more than 12 to 13% crude protein. One kilogram of plant protein (true protein) fed in excess of an amount equivalent to 12 to 13% dietary protein equals about .3 kg metabolizable protein. (f)Protein supplementation of lactating cows might be related more to stage of lactation than to milk production. (g)Lactating cows having above average lactational ability may benefit from dietary protein as high as 16 to 17% (dry matter basis) during the first third of lactation. (h)Cows in the latter two-thirds of lactation appear to require 12.5% dietary protein or less. (i)Plant protein (true protein) should be the supplemental sources of nitrogen during the first third of lactation, with NPN providing most, if not all, the supplemental nitrogen during the last two-thirds of lactation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s303 · Cited by 17,923
Bain, L. J. (1967) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1967.10490452 · Cited by 3,407
(1966) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12555-x · Cited by 2,414
Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro
Satter, L. D., & Slyter, L. L. (1974) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19740073 · Cited by 1,797
Self-citationSOME NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDOMINANT CULTURABLE RUMINAL BACTERIA
Bryant, M. P., & Robinson, I. M. (1962) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.84.4.605-614.1962 · Cited by 311
Continuous cultivation of microorganisms: A review
Řičica, J. (1971) · Folia Microbiologica · doi:10.1007/bf02875760 · Cited by 217
Bailey, C. B. (1961) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19610062 · Cited by 182
Blaxter, K. L., & Wainman, F. W. (1964) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s002185960001515x · Cited by 177
Reid, J. T., Wellington, G. H., & Dunn, H. O. (1955) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(55)95117-1 · Cited by 175
Bailey, C. B. (1961) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19610053 · Cited by 160
Cited by
Broderick, G. A., & Kang, J. H. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82888-8 · Cited by 2,523
Metadata
- Authors
- Satter, L. D., & Roffler, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1975-08
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1219-1237
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047613462
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen Requirement and Utilization in Dairy Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(75)84698-4
- The paper
- Satter, L. D., & Roffler, R. E. (1975). Nitrogen Requirement and Utilization in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(75)84698-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.