The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SOME NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDOMINANT CULTURABLE RUMINAL BACTERIA
Open accessAbstract
Bryant , M. P. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Md.) and I. M. Robinson . Some nutritional characteristics of predominant culturable ruminal bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 84: 605–614. 1962.—The effect of enzymatic hydrolysate of casein, NH 4 + , a mixture of volatile fatty acids (acetic, n -valeric, isovaleric, 2-methylbutyric, and isobutyric), hemin, and ruminal fluid on growth of 89 freshly isolated strains of predominant culturable ruminal bacteria was studied, using basal media containing glucose, cellobiose, or maltose as energy source, minerals, cysteine, and S = as reducing agents, and H 2 CO 3 -HCO 3 − buffer. Of these strains, 13% (four morphological groups) grew poorly or not at all in defined medium plus casein hydrolysate; 6% (one morphological group) required casein hydrolysate; 56% (four morphological groups) grew with either NH 4 + or casein hydrolysate as the main source of nitrogen; and NH 4 + , but not casein hydrolysate, was essential for 25% of the strains (five morphological groups). The volatile fatty acid mixture excluding acetate was essential for 19% of the strains (five morphological groups), and this mixture and acetate were necessary for good growth of 23% of the strains (one morphological group) when casein hydrolysate was excluded from the medium; 30% of the strains (one morphological group) required hemin. Similar studies are reported on 35 old laboratory strains of ruminal bacteria, most of which were previously identified. The results indicate that most strains of ruminal bacteria can be grown in defined media, and suggest the relative importance of NH 4 + and volatile fatty acids and the relative lack of importance of organic nitrogen compounds such as amino acids in the nutrition of these bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Broderick, G. A., & Kang, J. H. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82888-8 · Cited by 2,523
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., & Bryant, M. P. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_2 · Cited by 772
Self-citationNitrogen Requirement and Utilization in Dairy Cattle
Satter, L. D., & Roffler, R. E. (1975) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(75)84698-4 · Cited by 398
Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds
Wallace, R. J., Onodera, R., & Cotta, M. A. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_7 · Cited by 267
Kaneko, T., Mori, H., Iwata, M., & Meguro, S. (1994) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)76965-4 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryant, M. P., & Robinson, I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bacteriology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1962-10
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 605-614
- ISSN
- 0021-9193 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5530
- OpenAlex
- W1617396697
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOME NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDOMINANT CULTURABLE RUMINAL BACTERIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jb.84.4.605-614.1962
- The paper
- Bryant, M. P., & Robinson, I. M. (1962). SOME NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PREDOMINANT CULTURABLE RUMINAL BACTERIA. Journal of Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.84.4.605-614.1962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.