The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survival of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Human Stomach and Adhesion to Intestinal Cells
Open accessAbstract
The survival of four strains of lactic acid bacteria in human gastric juice, in vivo and in vitro, and in buffered saline, pH 1 to 5, has been investigated. The strains studied include two Lactobacillus acidophilus strains, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus. In addition, the adhesion of these strains to freshly collected human and pig small intestinal cells and to pig large intestinal cells has been studied and the effect of milk on both survival and adhesion tested. As a result of these investigations, an in vitro test system for screening potential cultures for use as human dietary adjuncts can be developed. The ability to survive in gastric juice and to adhere varied significantly for the strains tested; L. acidophilus ADH survived and adhered better than the others while S. thermophilus survived and adhered poorly. For all strains, both survival and adhesion was enhanced by milk. As all strains adhered to some extent to both human and pig intestinal cells, the adhesion mechanism is probably a nonspecific attachment as opposed to other reported specific Lactobacillus adhesion to gastric tissue. From the survival and adhesion data it seems feasible to obtain elevated levels of viable Lactobacillus sp. in human intestine by careful selection of the bacterial strains ingested. Furthermore, the in vitro methods used here should be valuable to screen potential strains. The data presented here can then be correlated with human in vivo studies monitoring the beneficial effect of ingestion of these Lactobacillus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Diet and Lactobacillus acidophilus Supplements on Human Fecal Bacterial Enzymes23
Goldin, B. R., Swenson, L., Dwyer, J., Sexton, M., & Gorbach, S. L. (1980) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/64.2.255 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Cited by
Probiotic bacteria: Selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods
Shah, N. P. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74953-8 · Cited by 1,010
Microorganisms with Claimed Probiotic Properties: An Overview of Recent Literature
Fijan, S. (2014) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph110504745 · Cited by 1,059
Dunne, C., O’Mahony, L., Murphy, L., Thornton, G., Morrissey, D., O’Halloran, S., Feeney, M., Flynn, S., Fitzgerald, G., Daly, C., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s · Cited by 922
Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products
Maragkoudakis, P. A., Zoumpopoulou, G., Miaris, C., Kalantzopoulos, G., Pot, B., & Tsakalidou, E. (2006) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.02.009 · Cited by 618
Adolfsson, O., Meydani, S. N., & Russell, R. M. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.2.245 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Conway, P. L., Gorbach, S. L., & Goldin, B. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995381856
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Human Stomach and Adhesion to Intestinal Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(87)79974-3
- The paper
- Conway, P. L., Gorbach, S. L., & Goldin, B. R. (1987). Survival of Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Human Stomach and Adhesion to Intestinal Cells. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(87)79974-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.