Cited by 618Probiotics and Fermented FoodsReproductive tract infections researchInfant Nutrition and Health

Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products

Maragkoudakis, Petros A., Zoumpopoulou, Georgia, Miaris, Christos, Kalantzopoulos, George, Pot, Bruno, Tsakalidou, Effie·2006·International Dairy Journal

Abstract

Twenty-nine Lactobacillus strains of dairy origin were examined in vitro for their probiotic potential. Only a few strains were able to survive at pH 1 or in the presence of pepsin, while all were unaffected by pH 3, pancreatin and bile salts. Strains exhibited variable bile salt hydrolase activity. None was haemolytic. The majority of strains were resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin, but sensitive to chloramphenicol and tetracycline. A few strains were able to adhere to Caco-2 cells. Although no bacteriocin activity was detected in vitro, strains L. casei Shirota ACA-DC 6002, L. plantarum ACA-DC 146 and L. paracasei subsp. tolerans ACA-DC 4037 were able to inhibit the adhesion of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium to Caco-2 cells. They also induced the secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These three strains were therefore found, in vitro, to possess desirable probiotic properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.02.009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various members of the Lactobacillaceae family, which are common NSLAB of cheeses, have performed favourably in terms of probiotic potential.

    “Various members of the Lactobacillaceae family, which are common NSLAB of cheeses, have performed favourably in terms of probiotic potential, some of which were originally isolated from cheese and other dairy sources (Maragkoudakis, Zoumpopoulou, Miaris, Kalantzopoulos, Pot, & Tsakalidou, 2006;Fijan, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maragkoudakis, P. A., Zoumpopoulou, G., Miaris, C., Kalantzopoulos, G., Pot, B., & Tsakalidou, E.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural University of Athens (GR)
  • Institut Pasteur de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Tsakalidou, Effie
Venue
International Dairy Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
189-199
ISSN
0958-6946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991131095
Cited by
618
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Dairy Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotic potential, Lactobacillus, dairy products, bile salt hydrolase, acid and bile tolerance, Caco-2 cell adhesion, bacteriocin activity, Lactobacillus casei Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, Escherichia coli inhibition, cytokine production, anti-inflammatory activity, antimicrobial susceptibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review