The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Yeast Culture Supplement on Production, Rumen Fermentation, and Duodenal Nitrogen Flow in Dairy Cows
Open accessAbstract
Six lactating Holstein cows fitted with rumen and T-type duodenal cannulas were used in a crossover design to examine effects of yeast culture supplement on production parameters, rumen fermentation, and flow of N to the duodenum. Treatments were control and control plus 10 g/d of yeast culture. Dry matter intake was greater, and milk production tended to be higher, for cows supplemented with yeast culture, but milk composition was not affected. Rumen pH was not affected by yeast culture, but peak lactic acid concentration decreased from 1.93 to 1.73 mM. Rumen fluid acetate:propionate ratio, dilution rate (percentage per hour), and ammonia N concentration (milligrams per deciliter) were 2.28, .12, and 10.7 and 2.04, .13, and 9.6 for control cows and for cows supplemented with yeast culture, respectively. Although numbers of fiber-digesting bacteria were not affected by yeast culture, DM disappearance of wheat straw tended to be higher at 12 and 24 h, and CP and ADF digestibilities were greater. Duodenal NAN flow tended to be higher in cows supplemented with yeast culture because of higher bacterial N flow. Duodenal AA profile and flow of Met were significantly affected by yeast culture supplementation. The results suggest that yeast culture may alter the AA profile of bacterial protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dawson, K. A., Newman, K. E., & Boling, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1990.68103392x · Cited by 243
Cited by
Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future
Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Walker, N. D., & Bach, A. (2008) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.019 · Cited by 466
Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Sauvant, D. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1414 · Cited by 420
Newbold, C. J., Wallace, R. J., Chen, X. B., & McIntosh, F. M. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7361811x · Cited by 273
Lesmeister, K. E., Heinrichs, A. J., & Gabler, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73340-8 · Cited by 258
Effects of a supplemental yeast culture on heat-stressed lactating Holstein cows
Shwartz, G., Rhoads, M. L., VanBaale, M. J., Rhoads, R. P., & Baumgard, L. H. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1496 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Erasmus, L. J., Botha, P. M., & Kistner, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3056-3065
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993979259
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Yeast Culture Supplement on Production, Rumen Fermentation, and Duodenal Nitrogen Flow in Dairy Cows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)78069-2
- The paper
- Erasmus, L. J., Botha, P. M., & Kistner, A. (1992). Effect of Yeast Culture Supplement on Production, Rumen Fermentation, and Duodenal Nitrogen Flow in Dairy Cows. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)78069-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.