The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mastitis in Dairy Heifers: Initial Studies on Prevalence and Control
Open accessAbstract
Initial studies to determine the prevalence of mastitis in heifers of breeding age and in pregnant dairy heifers demonstrated that IMI were present in 97% of heifers and 75% of quarters. The most common isolates were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus hyicus, and Staphylococcus chromogenes; SCC ranged from 12.4 to 17.3 x 10(6)/ml. Approximately 29% of heifers and 15% of quarters exhibited clinical mastitis at breeding age, as evidenced by clots or flakes in mammary secretions. Histologic examination of mammary tissues demonstrated significant reductions in alveolar epithelial and luminal areas and increases in connective tissue stroma and leukocytosis, illustrating limited development and marked inflammation of infected tissues. A one-time infusion of antibiotic for nonlactating cows into infected quarters > or = 45 d prepartum reduced incidence of IMI by 59% at calving compared with the pretreatment level; the cure rate for Staph. aureus IMI was > 90%. Prophylactic treatment of uninfected quarters > or = 45 d prepartum reduced new Streptococcus sp. IMI by 93%. The mean SCC was 50% lower at calving for treated heifers, and milk yield over the first 2 mo of lactation was 10% greater than that of untreated controls. Heifers from herds using fly control had a lower prevalence of IMI than herds without fly control. Prevalences of IMI and SCC in dairy heifers were higher than previously realized, but mastitis at calving was controlled by use of therapeutic products for nonlactating cows during pregnancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Escherichia coli O157:H7: Animal Reservoir and Sources of Human Infection
Ferens, W. A., & Hovde, C. J. (2011) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2010.0673 · Cited by 537
Advances in therapeutic and managemental approaches of bovine mastitis: a comprehensive review
Sharun, K., Dhama, K., Tiwari, R., Gugjoo, M. B., Iqbal Yatoo, M., Patel, S. K., Pathak, M., Karthik, K., Khurana, S. K., Singh, R., et al. (2021) · Veterinary Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01652176.2021.1882713 · Cited by 359
Sargeant, J. M., Leslie, K. E., Shirley, J. E., Pulkrabek, B. J., & Lim, G. H. (2001) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74645-0 · Cited by 258
The Effect of Selective Dry Cow Treatment on New Intramammary Infections
Berry, E. A., & Hillerton, J. E. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74059-9 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Nickerson, S. C., Owens, W. E., & Boddie, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1607-1618
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049216824
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mastitis in Dairy Heifers: Initial Studies on Prevalence and Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(95)76785-6
- The paper
- Nickerson, S. C., Owens, W. E., & Boddie, R. L. (1995). Mastitis in Dairy Heifers: Initial Studies on Prevalence and Control. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(95)76785-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.