The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation of Acid Detergent Lignin and Klason Lignin with Digestibility of Forage Dry Matter and Neutral Detergent Fiber
Open accessAbstract
The acid detergent lignin and Klason lignin methods were compared for their correlation with forage digestibility. Thirty-six forages, including C3 legumes and C3 and C4 grasses, were analyzed for sulfuric acid detergent lignin, Klason lignin, and in vitro digestibilities of dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Twenty of these forages were also fed to lambs at restricted intake for measurement of DM and NDF digestibilities. Lignin concentrations determined by the two lignin methods were positively correlated, and the Klason lignin value was always greater than the acid detergent lignin concentration. The largest differences were observed for grass forages. Digestibilities of forage DM and NDF were negatively correlated with both lignin methods for the in vitro system and the lamb digestibility trials. The degree of correlation for the two lignin methods with digestibility was generally similar across all forages and within forage classes. Slopes of linear regressions of digestibility on lignin concentration did not differ between legumes and grasses. Although the sulfuric acid detergent lignin and Klason lignin procedures gave very different estimates of forage lignin concentration, they were similarly correlated with digestibility and should yield predictions of forage digestibility that have similar accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dien, B. S., Jung, H.-J. G., Vogel, K. P., Casler, M. D., Lamb, J. F. S., Iten, L., Mitchell, R. B., & Sarath, G. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.004 · Cited by 491
Self-citationUnderstanding Factors that Limit Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Biomass
Laureano-Perez, L., Teymouri, F., Alizadeh, H., & Dale, B. E. (2009) · Twenty-Sixth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-991-2_91 · Cited by 279
van der Weijde, T., Torres, A. F., Dolstra, O., Dechesne, A., Visser, R. G. F., & Trindade, L. M. (2016) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9669-z · Cited by 49
van Parijs, F., Van Waes, C., Vandecasteele, B., Haesaert, G., Roldán‐Ruiz, I., & Muylle, H. (2018) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12293 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, H. G., Mertens, D. R., & Payne, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1622-1628
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012386346
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of Acid Detergent Lignin and Klason Lignin with Digestibility of Forage Dry Matter and Neutral Detergent Fiber. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76093-4
- The paper
- Jung, H. G., Mertens, D. R., & Payne, A. J. (1997). Correlation of Acid Detergent Lignin and Klason Lignin with Digestibility of Forage Dry Matter and Neutral Detergent Fiber. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76093-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.