CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Yeast on Feed Intake and Performance of Cows Fed Diets Based on Corn Silage During Early Lactation

Open access
Wohlt, J.E., Corcione, T.T., Zajac, P.K.·1998·Journal of Dairy Science
DOI 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75697-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Thirty-six multiparous Holstein cows were fed a mixture of corn silage and concentrate [1:1; dry matter (DM) basis] and long hay (0.9 kg/d) through wk 18 of lactation. Beginning at 30 d prepartum through wk 4 of lactation, the total mixed rations of 18 of these cows were top-dressed daily with 10 g of Biomate Yeast Plus (Chr. Hansen's, Inc., Milwaukee, WI). The other 18 cows served as controls. At wk 5, both control and treated cows were divided into three groups and fed 0, 10, or 20 g/d of yeast. Yeast supplementation during early lactation significantly improved DM intake, milk yield, and the digestibility of crude protein and acid detergent fiber. Least squares means for DM intake, fat-corrected milk yield, crude protein digestibility, and acid detergent fiber digestibility for cows fed 0, 10, 20 g/d of yeast during wk 5 to 18 of lactation were 23.8, 24.7, and 25.0 kg/d; 37.7, 40.7, and 41.4 kg/d; 78.5, 80.8, and 79.5%; and 54.4, 60.2, and 56.8%, respectively. Although numerical responses in DM intake and milk yield were greater for cows fed 20 g/d of yeast than for cows fed 10 g/d of yeast, the response was not significant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75697-8

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dawson, 1993, Current and future role of yeast culture in animal production: a review of research over the last seven years, 269
  2. SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–143 of 143

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wohlt, J. E., Corcione, T. T., & Zajac, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher
American Dairy Science Association
Published
1998-05
Volume
81
Issue
5
Pages
1345-1352
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75697-8
OpenAlex
W2090639913
Cited by
145
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
yeast supplementation, yeast culture, Holstein cows, early lactation, dry matter intake, milk yield, crude protein digestibility, acid detergent fiber digestibility, corn silage, total mixed ration, dairy cattle nutrition
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Cattle, Zea mays, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Eating, Female, Lactation, Nitrogen, Nutritional Requirements, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Silage, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review