The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Genotype and Ensiling of Corn Grain on In Situ Degradation of Starch in the Rumen
Open accessAbstract
This trial was conducted to determine the influence of genotype and ensiling of corn grain on the rate and extent of ruminal starch degradation. Two cultivars of corn that differed in texture of the endosperm, dent (Zea mays ssp. indentata) or flint (Zea mays ssp. indentura) were harvested at 30% whole-plant dry matter (DM). After separation from stover and cob, the kernels were coarsely chopped and ensiled or not ensiled. Grains were oven-dried at 40 degrees C and either ground through a 3-mm sieve or left unground. Ruminal DM and starch degradabilities were determined using the in situ technique. The proportion of starch lost through the pores of the bag without degradation was also determined. Mean ruminal DM and starch degradabilities were higher for ground grains than for chopped grains, which could be related to the proportion of DM and starch lost through the pores of the bag. For unensiled, chopped grain, ruminal starch degradability was higher for dent corn than for flint corn (72.3% vs. 61.6%). The ensiling process increased ruminal starch degradability, averaging 5.8 percentage units. The difference in ruminal starch degradability between dent corn and flint corn remained constant whether the corn was unensiled or ensiled (10.7 vs. 11.6 percentage units).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ørskov, E. R., & McDonald, I. (1979) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600063048 · Cited by 4,794
Starch utilization by ruminants: from basics to the bunk.
Huntington, G. B. (1997) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1997.753852x · Cited by 813
Nocek, J. E., & Tamminga, S. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78552-4 · Cited by 613
Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms
McAllister, T. A., Phillippe, R. C., Rode, L. M., & Cheng, K.-J. (1993) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1993.711205x · Cited by 275
Starch Hydrolysis by the Ruminal Microflora ,
Kotarski, S. F., KWaniska, R. D., & Thurn, K. K. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.1.178 · Cited by 248
Influence of genotype and stage of maturity of maize on rate of ruminal starch degradation
Philippeau, C., & Michalet-Doreau, B. (1997) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00042-4 · Cited by 155
Self-citationHunt, C. W., Kezar, W. W., & Vinande, R. (1992) · jpa · doi:10.2134/jpa1992.0286 · Cited by 133
Resistant starch determination adapted to products containing high level of resistant starch
Faisant, N., Planchot, V., Kozlowski, F., Pacouret, M. P., Colonna, P., & Champ, M. M. J. (1995) · HAL · Cited by 120
Galyean, M. L., Wagner, D., & Owens, F. N. (1981) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(81)82769-5 · Cited by 89
Microbial fermentation of cereal grains in vitro
Opatpatanakit, Y., Kellaway, R., Lean, I. J., Annison, G., & Kirby, A. (1994) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9941247 · Cited by 81
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aseltine, 1988, Corn silage quality can vary depending on hybrid planted, Feedstuffs, 60, 13
- Knowlton, 1996, Effect of corn grain maturity and processing on performance, rumen fermentation, and site of starch digestion in early lactation dairy cattle, J. Dairy Sci., 79, 138
- SAS® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.03 Edition. 1988. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages
Kung, L., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13909 · Cited by 1,316
Ferraretto, L. F., Crump, P. M., & SHAVER, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5932 · Cited by 291
Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality
Khan, N. A., Yu, P., Ali, M., Cone, J. W., & Hendriks, W. H. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6703 · Cited by 251
Hoffman, P. C., Esser, N. M., Shaver, R. D., Coblentz, W. K., Scott, M. P., Bodnar, A. L., Schmidt, R. J., & Charley, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3562 · Cited by 249
Johnson, L., Harrison, J. H., Hunt, C., Shinners, K., Doggett, C. G., & Sapienza, D. (1999) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75540-2 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Philippeau, C., & Michalet-Doreau, B.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2178-2184
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011588604
- Semantic Scholar
- a919c4920082f3f79feb44d599b1ace73fc8b77f
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- maize grain, silage fermentation, dent corn, flint corn, genotype effects, endosperm texture, in situ degradability, rumen fermentation, forage grain
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Zea mays, Genotype, Rumen, Silage, Starch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
