The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competition for Total Mixed Diets Fed for Ad Libitum Intake Using One or Four Cows per Feeding Station
Open accessAbstract
When dairy cow facilities are being designed, a limited feeding area might be profitable and recommendable if the increased competition for feed does not harm the welfare of the animals or affect production negatively. An experiment was conducted at the University Cattle Research Centre (Uppsala, Sweden) to investigate the performance of individual cows as well as groups of cows. Treatments used 1 or 4 cows per feeding station with a total mixed diet fed for ad libitum intake. The feeding stations were troughs placed on electronic balances and were 1.08 m wide. Sixteen dairy cows were divided into two groups and were studied in an experiment with a change-over design so that each group went through each treatment twice. A computerized feeding system automatically recorded consumption data for feed and water. Video recordings were used to study the social dominance order, the level of aggression at the feeding area, and the time budget of the cows. The mean feed intake increased slightly, but the number of visits to the feeding stations did not change at the higher level of competition. The cows, however, spent significantly less time eating and increased their consumption rate when the competition level increased. The number of displacements at the feeding stations increased dramatically. Cows of low social rank were much more frequently displaced while eating. The effects of dominance value, age, eating rate, and energy requirement of the cows are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeVries, T. J., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., & Weary, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73293-2 · Cited by 287
González, L. A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., & Ferret, A. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009 · Cited by 256
Use of pattern recognition techniques for early detection of morbidity in receiving feedlot cattle 1
Moya, D., Silasi, R., McAllister, T. A., Genswein, B., Crowe, T., Marti, S., & Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2015-8907 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Olofsson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-79
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138736212
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition for Total Mixed Diets Fed for Ad Libitum Intake Using One or Four Cows per Feeding Station. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75210-0
- The paper
- Olofsson, J. (1999). Competition for Total Mixed Diets Fed for Ad Libitum Intake Using One or Four Cows per Feeding Station. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75210-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.