CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 256Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and feeding behavior (a review)

González, L.A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.S., Ferret, A.·2012·Animal Feed Science and Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle is a common metabolic disorder of digestive origin with significant economic and welfare implications. The main risk factors are high grain, low roughage diets because of their high rate and extent of degradation by rumen microbes. Diet formulation should therefore consider the proportion, method of processing and type of grain; the proportion, fiber concentration and particle size of forages; and the use of feed additives. Grain and forage characteristics, and feed additives, may determine the rate and amount of organic acids produced in the rumen. In addition, diet formulation may also affect feeding behavior, i.e. feed intake and chewing behaviors, which has a great influence on ruminal fluid acid–base balance. Feeding characteristics associated with low ruminal fluid pH are: high dry matter intake and ingestion of large meals because of the greater amount of acid production per period of time, high eating rate because of lower feed ensalivation, short time spent chewing while eating and ruminating because of lower daily saliva production, and large variations in feeding behavior patterns throughout the day such as less frequent meals and rumination. The ruminal acid–base balance requires synchronization in time between acid production and neutralization through saliva, as well as elimination through absorption, wash-out from the rumen, and metabolization. Greater proportions of roughage in the diet and greater particle size leads to slower eating rate and longer chewing time which favors saliva production, and smaller meals which reduce the amount of acid production. Adaptation of feeding behavior to diets with greater proportion of concentrates also plays an important role, as smaller meals and more even distribution of intake throughout the day lead to a better synchronization in time between acid production and elimination or neutralization. Monensin increases the frequency of meals and reduces meal size which is beneficial for ruminal fluid pH, whereas sodium bicarbonate at high concentrations produces the opposite effects and reduces rumination. In addition to diet formulation, feeding management and the social environment may also affect feeding behavior and consequently, ruminal fluid pH. Delivering the feed twice daily results in better synchronization in time between feed intake (acid production), rumination (saliva production), and elimination of fermentation products from the rumen. In contrast, feeding programs that restrict feed amount and time available allow animals to become hungry, whereas restricted feeding space increases competition among group mates. Both situations lead to fewer and larger meals eaten at a faster rate, and consequently, greater risk of ruminal acidosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
González, L. A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., & Ferret, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
González, L.A.
ORCID
Venue
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
172
Issue
1-2
Pages
66-79
ISSN
0377-8401 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009
OpenAlex
W2074905535
Cited by
256
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Animal Feed Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
rumen acidosis, feedlot cattle, feeding behavior, rumen function, acid-base balance, saliva production, rumination, meal size, feed additives, monensin, sodium bicarbonate, feed management, social environment, diet formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review