The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma: Clinical article
Abstract
Object: With recent advances in the adjuvant treatment of malignant brain astrocytomas, it is increasingly debated whether extent of resection affects survival. In this study, the authors investigate this issue after primary and revision resection of these lesions. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the cases of 1215 patients who underwent surgery for malignant brain astrocytomas (World Health Organization [WHO] Grade III or IV) at a single institution from 1996 to 2006. Patients with deep-seated or unresectable lesions were excluded. Based on MR imaging results obtained < 48 hours after surgery, gross-total resection (GTR) was defined as no residual enhancement, near-total resection (NTR) as having thin rim enhancement of the resection cavity only, and subtotal resection (STR) as having residual nodular enhancement. The independent association of extent of resection and subsequent survival was assessed via a multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging studies were available for review in 949 cases. The mean age and mean Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score at time of surgery were 51 ± 16 years and 80 ± 10, respectively. Surgery consisted of primary resection in 549 patients (58%) and revision resection for tumor recurrence in 400 patients (42%). The lesion was WHO Grade IV in 700 patients (74%) and Grade III in 249 (26%); there were 167 astrocytomas and 82 mixed oligoastrocytoma. Among patients who underwent resection, GTR, NTR, and STR were achieved in 330 (35%), 388 (41%), and 231 cases (24%), respectively. Adjusting for factors associated with survival (for example, age, KPS score, Gliadel and/or temozolomide use, and subsequent resection), GTR versus NTR (p < 0.05) and NTR versus STR (p < 0.05) were independently associated with improved survival after both primary and revision resection of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). For primary GBM resection, the median survival after GTR, NTR, and STR was 13, 11, and 8 months, respectively. After revision resection, the median survival after GTR, NTR, and STR was 11, 9, and 5 months, respectively. Adjusting for factors associated with survival for WHO Grade III astrocytoma (age, KPS score, and revision resection), GTR versus STR (p < 0.05) was associated with improved survival. Gross-total resection versus NTR was not associated with an independent survival benefit in patients with WHO Grade III astrocytomas. The median survival after primary resection of WHO Grade III (mixed oligoastrocytomas excluded) for GTR, NTR, and STR was 58, 46, and 34 months, respectively. Conclusions: In the authors' experience with both primary and secondary resection of malignant brain astrocytomas, increasing extent of resection was associated with improved survival independent of age, degree of disability, WHO grade, or subsequent treatment modalities used. The maximum extent of resection should be safely attempted while minimizing the risk of surgically induced neurological injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807
Cited by
Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment
Davis, M. (2016) · Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1188/16.cjon.s1.2-8 · Cited by 1,205
Brown, T. J., Brennan, M. C., Li, M., Church, E. W., Brandmeir, N. J., Rakszawski, K. L., Patel, A. S., Rizk, E. B., Suki, D., Sawaya, R., et al. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1373 · Cited by 1,081
Molinaro, A. M., Hervey-Jumper, S., Morshed, R. A., Young, J., Han, S. J., Chunduru, P., Zhang, Y., Phillips, J. J., Shai, A., Lafontaine, M., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143 · Cited by 631
Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores
Zhang, R. R., Schroeder, A. B., Grudzinski, J. J., Rosenthal, E. L., Warram, J. M., Pinchuk, A. N., Eliceiri, K. W., Kuo, J. S., & Weichert, J. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.212 · Cited by 485
Awake craniotomy to maximize glioma resection: methods and technical nuances over a 27-year period
Hervey-Jumper, S. L., Li, J., Lau, D., Molinaro, A. M., Perry, D. W., Meng, L., & Berger, M. S. (2015) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.10.jns141520 · Cited by 451
5-ALA and FDA Approval for Glioma Surgery
Hadjipanayis, C. G., & Stummer, W. (2019) · Journal of Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1007/s11060-019-03098-y · Cited by 338
Chaichana, K. L., Pinheiro, L., & Brem, H. (2015) · Therapeutic Delivery · doi:10.4155/tde.14.114 · Cited by 91
Self-citationChaichana, K. L., Pendleton, C., Chambless, L., Camara-Quintana, J., Nathan, J. K., Hassam-Malani, L., Li, G., Harsh, G. R., Thompson, R. C., Lim, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.007 · Cited by 43
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McGirt, M. J., Chaichana, K. L., Gathinji, M., Attenello, F. J., Than, K., Olivi, A., Weingart, J. D., Brem, H., & Quiñones-Hinojosa, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156-162
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0693
- OpenAlex
- W1624957772
- Cited by
- 809
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.