The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Craniopharyngioma and other cystic epithelial lesions of the sellar region: a review of clinical, imaging, and histopathological relationships
Open accessAbstract
Object: Cystic epithelial masses of the sellar and parasellar region may be difficult to differentiate on a clinical, imaging, or even histopathological basis. The authors review the developmental relationships and differentiating features of various epithelial lesions of the sellar region. Methods: The authors performed a review of the literature to identify previous studies describing the etiological relationships and differentiating features of various cystic sellar lesions, including craniopharyngioma (CP), Rathke cleft cyst, xanthogranuloma, and dermoid and epidermoid cysts. Results: There is significant evidence in the literature to support a common ectodermal origin of selected sellar and suprasellar cystic lesions, which may account for the overlap of features and transitional states observed in some cases. Research obtained from animal studies and reports of transitional cystic epithelial masses or lesions crossing over from typical to more aggressive pathological subtypes have collectively provided a solid foundation for this theory. Histological features that signify transitional entities beyond simple benign Rathke cleft cysts include squamous metaplasia, stratified squamous epithelium, and ciliated or mucinous goblet cells in squamous-papillary CPs. Several studies have identified key clinical, imaging, and histopathological features that can be used in the differentiation of these lesions. Conclusions: The pattern of embryological formation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis plays a major role in its propensity for developing cystic epithelial lesions. Subsequent inflammatory, metaplastic, and neoplastic processes may promote further progression along the pathological continuum, ranging from benign epithelial cysts to aggressive neoplastic cystic CPs. Selected clinical, imaging, and histopathological features can be used collectively to help differentiate these lesions and assign a formal diagnosis, thus accurately guiding further treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Karavitaki, N., Cudlip, S., Adams, C. B. T., & Wass, J. A. H. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0002 · Cited by 514
Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: A review of 881 patients
Nemergut, E. C., Zuo, Z., Jane, J. A., & Laws, E. R. (2005) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0448 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Trifanescu, R., Ansorge, O., Wass, J. A. H., Grossman, A. B., & Karavitaki, N. (2012) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04235.x · Cited by 175
Müller, H. L., Gebhardt, U., Faldum, A., Warmuth-Metz, M., Pietsch, T., Pohl, F., Calaminus, G., & Sörensen, N. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-2069 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Zada, G., Lin, N., Ojerholm, E., Ramkissoon, S., & Laws, E. R.
- Venue
- Neurosurgical Focus
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- E4
- ISSN
- 1092-0684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985909432
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.