The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response: A review
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was approved by the US FDA in 1997 as an adjunctive treatment for medically refractory epilepsy. It is considered for use in patients who are poor candidates for resection or those in whom resection has failed. However, disagreement regarding the utility of VNS in epilepsy continues because of the variability in benefit reported across clinical studies. Moreover, although VNS was approved only for adults and adolescents with partial epilepsy, its efficacy in children and in patients with generalized epilepsy remains unclear. The authors performed the first meta-analysis of VNS efficacy in epilepsy, identifying 74 clinical studies with 3321 patients suffering from intractable epilepsy. These studies included 3 blinded, randomized controlled trials (Class I evidence); 2 nonblinded, randomized controlled trials (Class II evidence); 10 prospective studies (Class III evidence); and numerous retrospective studies. After VNS, seizure frequency was reduced by an average of 45%, with a 36% reduction in seizures at 3–12 months after surgery and a 51% reduction after > 1 year of therapy. At the last follow-up, seizures were reduced by 50% or more in approximately 50% of the patients, and VNS predicted a ≥ 50% reduction in seizures with a main effects OR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.80–1.86). Patients with generalized epilepsy and children benefited significantly from VNS despite their exclusion from initial approval of the device. Furthermore, posttraumatic epilepsy and tuberous sclerosis were positive predictors of a favorable outcome. In conclusion, VNS is an effective and relatively safe adjunctive therapy in patients with medically refractory epilepsy not amenable to resection. However, it is important to recognize that complete seizure freedom is rarely achieved using VNS and that a quarter of patients do not receive any benefit from therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ben‐Menachem, E., Mañon‐Espaillat, R., Ristanovic, R., Wilder, B. J., Stefan, H., Mirza, W., Tarver, W. B., Wernicke, J. F., & First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group (1994) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02482.x · Cited by 683
Vagus-nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy
Ben-Menachem, E. (2002) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00220-x · Cited by 560
Prospective Long‐Term Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Seizures
DeGiorgio, C. M., Schachter, S. C., Handforth, A., Salinsky, M., Thompson, J., Uthman, B., Reed, R., Collin, S., Tecoma, E., Morris, G. L., et al. (2000) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00325.x · Cited by 479
Cited by
Bonaz, B., Sinniger, V., & Pellissier, S. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp271539 · Cited by 561
Structural brain abnormalities in the common epilepsies assessed in a worldwide ENIGMA study
Whelan, C. D., Altmann, A., Botía, J. A., Jahanshad, N., Hibar, D. P., Absil, J., Alhusaini, S., Alvim, M. K. M., Auvinen, P., Bartolini, E., et al. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx341 · Cited by 531
Hulsey, D. R., Riley, J. R., Loerwald, K. W., Rennaker, R. L., Kilgard, M. P., & Hays, S. A. (2017) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.12.005 · Cited by 313
Rates and Predictors of Seizure Freedom With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy
Englot, D. J., Rolston, J. D., Wright, C. W., Hassnain, K. H., & Chang, E. F. (2016) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000001165 · Cited by 308
Self-citationThe RNS System: responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy
Sun, F. T., & Morrell, M. J. (2014) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2014.947274 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Englot, D. J., Chang, E. F., & Auguste, K. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1248-1255
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0693
- OpenAlex
- W2059497817
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/2011.7.jns11977
- The paper
- Englot, D. J., Chang, E. F., & Auguste, K. I. (2011). Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: a meta-analysis of efficacy and predictors of response: A review. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.jns11977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.