Cited by 479Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchEpilepsy research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatments

Prospective Long‐Term Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Seizures

DeGiorgio, C. M., Schachter, S. C., Handforth, A., Salinsky, M., Thompson, J., Uthman, B., Reed, R., Collin, S. +16 more·2000·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose : To determine the long‐term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for refractory seizures. VNS is a new treatment for refractory epilepsy. Two short‐term double‐blind trials have demonstrated its safety and efficacy, and one long‐term study in 114 patients has demonstrated a cumulative improvement in efficacy at 1 year. We report the largest prospective long‐term study of VNS to date. Methods : Patients with six or more complex partial or generalized tonic‐clonic seizures enrolled in the pivotal EOS study were prospectively evaluated for 12 months. The primary outcome variable was the percentage reduction in total seizure frequency at 3 and 12 months after completion of the acute EO5 trial, compared with the preimplantation baseline. Subjects originally randomized to low stimulation (active‐control group) were crossed over to therapeutic stimulation settings for the first time. Subjects initially randomized to high settings were maintained on high settings throughout the 12‐month study. Results : The median reduction at 12 months after completion of the initial double‐blind study was 45%. At 12 months, 35% of 195 subjects had a >50% reduction in seizures, and 20% of 195 had a >75% reduction in seizures. Conclusions : The efficacy of VNS improves during 12 months, and many subjects sustain >75% reductions in seizures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00325.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeGiorgio, C. M., Schachter, S. C., Handforth, A., Salinsky, M., Thompson, J., Uthman, B., Reed, R., Collin, S., Tecoma, E., Morris, G. L., Vaughn, B., Naritoku, D. K., Henry, T., Labar, D., Gilmartin, R., Labiner, D., Osorio, I., Ristanovic, R., Jones, J., Murphy, J., Ney, G., Wheless, J., Lewis, P., & Heck, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • SIU Medicine (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
DeGiorgio, C. M.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1195-1200
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1965258124
Cited by
479
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 19
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, drug-resistant epilepsy, refractory seizures, seizure frequency reduction, long-term efficacy, complex partial seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Epilepsy, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Vagus Nerve, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review