Cited by 12Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesRestraint-Related Deaths

Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation in cadavers—effect of severe distractive-flexion injury on C3–4 motion

Hindman, Bradley J., Fontes, Ricardo B., From, Robert P., Traynelis, Vincent C., Todd, Michael M., Puttlitz, Christian M., Santoni, Brandon G.·2016·Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With application of the forces of intubation, injured (unstable) cervical segments may move more than they normally do, which can result in spinal cord injury. The authors tested whether, during endotracheal intubation, intervertebral motion of an injured C3–4 cervical segment 1) is greater than that in the intact (stable) state and 2) differs when a high- or low-force laryngoscope is used. METHODS: Fourteen cadavers underwent 3 intubations using force-sensing laryngoscopes while simultaneous cervical spine motion was recorded with lateral fluoroscopy. The first intubation was performed with an intact cervical spine and a conventional high-force line-of-sight Macintosh laryngoscope. After creation of a severe C3–4 distractive-flexion injury, 2 additional intubations were performed, one with the Macintosh laryngoscope and the other with a low-force indirect video laryngoscope (Airtraq), used in random order. RESULTS: During Macintosh intubations, between the intact and the injured conditions, C3–4 extension (0.3° ± 3.0° vs 0.4° ± 2.7°, respectively; p = 0.9515) and anterior-posterior subluxation (−0.1 ± 0.4 mm vs −0.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively; p = 0.2754) did not differ. During Macintosh and Airtraq intubations with an injured C3–4 segment, despite a large difference in applied force between the 2 laryngoscopes, segmental extension (0.4° ± 2.7° vs 0.3° ± 3.3°, respectively; p = 0.8077) and anterior-posterior subluxation (0.3 ± 0.6 mm vs 0.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; p = 0.3203) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' hypotheses regarding the relationship between laryngoscope force and the motion of an injured cervical segment were not confirmed. Motion-force relationships (biomechanics) of injured cervical intervertebral segments during endotracheal intubation in cadavers are not predicted by the in vitro biomechanical behavior of isolated cervical segments. With the limitations inherent to cadaveric studies, the results of this study suggest that not all forms of cervical spine injury are at risk for pathological motion and cervical cord injury during conventional high-force line-of-sight intubation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2016.3.spine1640

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cadaveric studies of unstable c-spine injuries, movement occurring with both direct laryngoscopy (DL) and indirect laryngoscopy do not significantly exceed the physiologic values observed with intact spines.

    “In cadaveric studies of unstable c-spine injuries, movement occurring with both direct laryngoscopy (DL) and indirect laryngoscopy do not significantly exceed the physiologic values observed with intact spines.35,36”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [35]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hindman, B. J., Fontes, R. B., From, R. P., Traynelis, V. C., Todd, M. M., Puttlitz, C. M., & Santoni, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Published
2016-11
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
545-555
ISSN
  • 1547-5646 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-5654
OpenAlex
W2407841570
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB012048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
endotracheal intubation, cervical spine mobility, spinal cord injury, laryngoscope design, Macintosh laryngoscope, cadaveric spine biomechanics, fluoroscopy, force sensing
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cadaver, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Laryngoscopy, Male, Middle Aged, Motion, Supine Position, Laryngoscopes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review