The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial suturectomy for phenotypical craniosynostosis caused by incomplete fusion of cranial sutures: a novel surgical solution
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting with head shape changes phenotypical for craniosynostosis may have incomplete fusion of the involved sutures. The surgical literature is lacking in appropriate management strategies for these patients. In this paper, the authors evaluate their experience with a novel treatment strategy: suturectomy of only the fused portion followed by helmeting therapy in patients with skull deformity secondary to incomplete suture synostosis. METHODS: Patients with craniosynostosis with incomplete suture fusion requiring operative intervention between 2018 and 2020 were included for evaluation. Patients were selected for partial suturectomy if the patent portion of the suture had a normal appearance. All patients underwent craniectomy of the involved portion of the synostosed suture. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to reassess the degree of fusion at the time of surgery and incision planning. A 2- to 3-cm strip craniectomy was performed under direct visualization through a single minimal access incision. Postoperative helmeting was utilized for all patients. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including laser scan data in the form of cranial index (CI) and cranial vault asymmetry (CVA), defined as the difference between two diagonal measurements, from the frontozygomaticus to the opposite eurion. RESULTS: Four males and 1 female with a mean age of 2.8 months (range 1.1–3.9 months) at presentation were included. All patients had incomplete sagittal synostosis (one patient also had an incomplete left lambdoid synostosis and another had an incomplete left coronal synostosis). The mean age at surgery was 3.5 months (range 2.0–4.7 months) without any major complications. All patients were compliant with postoperative helmeting. The average age at the last follow-up was 12.8 months (range 5.3–23.7 months) with a mean follow-up duration of 9.3 months (range 0.5–19.6 months). Final laser scan evaluations were available for 3 patients and showed an improvement of the CI from an average of 71.3 (range 70–73) to 84.3 (range 82–86). The CVA improved from an average of 9.67 mm (range 2–22 mm) to 1.67 mm (range 1–2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive direct excision of the involved portion of fused cranial sutures followed by helmet therapy for phenotypical craniosynostosis is a safe and effective treatment strategy. This technique is suitable for very young patients and appears to offer similar outcomes to complete suturectomy. Further studies are required to see if this approach reduces the deformity severity for patients requiring vault remodeling later in life.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alternative surgical techniques such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis remain limited to specialized centres and lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques.
“Despite ongoing advancements, several alternative surgical techniques remain limited to specialized centres. Approaches such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis have been explored but lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques [54, 81–84].”
From Developments in diagnostic and surgical techniques in children with sagittal suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review spanning the last 30 years (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cites
Prevalence and Complications of Single-Gene and Chromosomal Disorders in Craniosynostosis
Wilkie, A. O. M., Byren, J. C., Hurst, J. A., Jayamohan, J., Johnson, D., Knight, S. J. L., Lester, T., Richards, P. G., Twigg, S. R. F., & Wall, S. A. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3491 · Cited by 297
The Changing Epidemiologic Spectrum of Single-Suture Synostoses
Selber, J. C., Reid, R. R., Chike-Obi, C. J., Sutton, L. N., Zackai, E. H., McDonald‐McGinn, D. M., Sonnad, S. S., Whitáker, L. A., & Bartlett, S. P. P. (2008) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31817d548c · Cited by 147
Phenotypically Unusual Combined Craniosynostoses: Presentation and Management
Greene, A., Mulliken, J., Proctor, M., Meara, J., & Rogers, G. (2008) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31817f45f0 · Cited by 57
Magge, K. T., Magge, S. N., Keating, R. F., Myseros, J. S., Boyajian, M. J., Sauerhammer, T. M., Rogers, G. F., & Oh, A. K. (2014) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000000797 · Cited by 33
Genetic bases of craniosynostoses: An update
Armand, T., Schaefer, É., Rocco, F. D., Edery, P., Collet, C., & Rossi, M. (2019) · Neurochirurgie · doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.10.003 · Cited by 30
Partial Suture Fusion in Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis
Boyajian, M. K., Al-Samkari, H. T., Nguyen, D. C., Naidoo, S. D., & Woo, A. S. (2020) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1177/1055665620902299 · Cited by 9
Mooney, M. P., Shand, J. M., Burrows, A. M., Smith, T. D., Caccamese, J. F., Cooper, G. M., Cray, J., Gilbert, J., Costello, B. J., Losee, J. E., et al. (2016) · The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal · doi:10.1597/16-065 · Cited by 4
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Armand T, Schaefer E, Di Rocco F, . Genetic bases of craniosynostoses: an update. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65(5):196–201.3160568310.1016/j.neuchi.2019.10.003 · DOI
- Wilkie AOM, Byren JC, Hurst JA, . Prevalence and complications of single-gene and chromosomal disorders in craniosynostosis. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):e391–e400.2064372710.1542/peds.2009-3491 · DOI · Paper page
- Selber J, Reid RR, Chike-Obi CJ, . The changing epidemiologic spectrum of single-suture synostoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(2):527–533.1862637110.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d548c · DOI
- Boyajian MK, Al-Samkari H, Nguyen DC, . Partial suture fusion in nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(4):499–505.3201356210.1177/1055665620902299 · DOI
- Magge KT, Magge SN, Keating RF, . Incidental findings on preoperative computed tomography for nonsyndromic single suture craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(4):1327–1330.10.1097/SCS.000000000000079724902116 · DOI
- Mooney MP, Shand JM, Burrows A, . Rescue of premature coronal suture fusion with TGF-β2 neutralizing antibody in rabbits with delayed-onset synostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(6):844–855.2750518210.1597/16-065 · DOI
- Greene AK, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, . Phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses: presentation and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(3):853–862.10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817f45f018766050 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hermann, J., Raak, C. K., Ostermann, T., & Scharbrodt, W. (2025) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-025-03978-9 · Cited by 2
“Approaches such as the Peau d’Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis have been explored but lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques [54, 81–84].”
Madoka, I., Hayashi, T., Kimiwada, T., Junji, T., Takehiko, S., Yoshihisa, S., Kitami, M., Kumabe, T., & Endo, H. (2023) · Child s Nervous System · doi:10.1007/s00381-023-06141-6 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobb, D. C., Patel, S. K., Pan, B. S., & Skoch, J.
- Affiliations
- Divisions of Plastic Surgery and
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Neurosurgical Focus
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- E6
- ISSN
- 1092-0684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3147538001
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurosurgical FOCUS (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Keywords
- craniosynostosis, sagittal synostosis, lambdoid synostosis, coronal synostosis, craniectomy, intraoperative ultrasound, cranial vault asymmetry, cranial index, cranial deformity, infants, minimally invasive surgery, laser scanning, surgical outcomes, complications, reoperation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Skull
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review