Cited by 2Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Partial suturectomy for phenotypical craniosynostosis caused by incomplete fusion of cranial sutures: a novel surgical solution

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting with head shape changes phenotypical for craniosynostosis may have incomplete fusion of the involved sutures. The surgical literature is lacking in appropriate management strategies for these patients. In this paper, the authors evaluate their experience with a novel treatment strategy: suturectomy of only the fused portion followed by helmeting therapy in patients with skull deformity secondary to incomplete suture synostosis. METHODS: Patients with craniosynostosis with incomplete suture fusion requiring operative intervention between 2018 and 2020 were included for evaluation. Patients were selected for partial suturectomy if the patent portion of the suture had a normal appearance. All patients underwent craniectomy of the involved portion of the synostosed suture. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to reassess the degree of fusion at the time of surgery and incision planning. A 2- to 3-cm strip craniectomy was performed under direct visualization through a single minimal access incision. Postoperative helmeting was utilized for all patients. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including laser scan data in the form of cranial index (CI) and cranial vault asymmetry (CVA), defined as the difference between two diagonal measurements, from the frontozygomaticus to the opposite eurion. RESULTS: Four males and 1 female with a mean age of 2.8 months (range 1.1–3.9 months) at presentation were included. All patients had incomplete sagittal synostosis (one patient also had an incomplete left lambdoid synostosis and another had an incomplete left coronal synostosis). The mean age at surgery was 3.5 months (range 2.0–4.7 months) without any major complications. All patients were compliant with postoperative helmeting. The average age at the last follow-up was 12.8 months (range 5.3–23.7 months) with a mean follow-up duration of 9.3 months (range 0.5–19.6 months). Final laser scan evaluations were available for 3 patients and showed an improvement of the CI from an average of 71.3 (range 70–73) to 84.3 (range 82–86). The CVA improved from an average of 9.67 mm (range 2–22 mm) to 1.67 mm (range 1–2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive direct excision of the involved portion of fused cranial sutures followed by helmet therapy for phenotypical craniosynostosis is a safe and effective treatment strategy. This technique is suitable for very young patients and appears to offer similar outcomes to complete suturectomy. Further studies are required to see if this approach reduces the deformity severity for patients requiring vault remodeling later in life.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2021.1.focus201024

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative surgical techniques such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis remain limited to specialized centres and lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques.

    “Despite ongoing advancements, several alternative surgical techniques remain limited to specialized centres. Approaches such as the Peau d'Ours technique, triple square extended osteotomies, and transsutural distraction osteogenesis have been explored but lack widespread clinical acceptance due to their complexity and the availability of more established techniques [54, 81–84].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Armand T, Schaefer E, Di Rocco F, . Genetic bases of craniosynostoses: an update. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65(5):196–201.3160568310.1016/j.neuchi.2019.10.003 · DOI
  2. Wilkie AOM, Byren JC, Hurst JA, . Prevalence and complications of single-gene and chromosomal disorders in craniosynostosis. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):e391–e400.2064372710.1542/peds.2009-3491 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Selber J, Reid RR, Chike-Obi CJ, . The changing epidemiologic spectrum of single-suture synostoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(2):527–533.1862637110.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d548c · DOI
  4. Boyajian MK, Al-Samkari H, Nguyen DC, . Partial suture fusion in nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(4):499–505.3201356210.1177/1055665620902299 · DOI
  5. Magge KT, Magge SN, Keating RF, . Incidental findings on preoperative computed tomography for nonsyndromic single suture craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(4):1327–1330.10.1097/SCS.000000000000079724902116 · DOI
  6. Mooney MP, Shand JM, Burrows A, . Rescue of premature coronal suture fusion with TGF-β2 neutralizing antibody in rabbits with delayed-onset synostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(6):844–855.2750518210.1597/16-065 · DOI
  7. Greene AK, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, . Phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses: presentation and management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(3):853–862.10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817f45f018766050 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lobb, D. C., Patel, S. K., Pan, B. S., & Skoch, J.
Affiliations
  • Divisions of Plastic Surgery and
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Neurosurgical Focus
Published
2021-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
E6
ISSN
1092-0684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3147538001
Cited by
2
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurosurgical FOCUS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
craniosynostosis, sagittal synostosis, lambdoid synostosis, coronal synostosis, craniectomy, intraoperative ultrasound, cranial vault asymmetry, cranial index, cranial deformity, infants, minimally invasive surgery, laser scanning, surgical outcomes, complications, reoperation
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Skull

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review