The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes
Abstract
Object: Electrical intracerebral stimulation (also referred to as deep brain stimulation [DBS]) is a tool for the treatment of chronic pain states that do not respond to less invasive or conservative treatment options. Careful patient selection, accurate target localization, and identification with intraoperative neurophysiological techniques and blinded test evaluation are the key requirements for success and good long-term results. The authors present their experience with DBS for the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes. Methods: In this study 56 patients with different forms of neuropathic and mixed nociceptive/neuropathic pain syndromes were treated with DBS according to a rigorous protocol. The postoperative follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 8 years, with a mean of 3.5 years. Electrodes were implanted in the somatosensory thalamus and the periventricular gray region. Before implantation of the stimulation device, a double-blinded evaluation was carefully performed to test the effect of each electrode on its own as well as combined stimulation with different parameter settings. The best long-term results were attained in patients with chronic low-back and leg pain, for example, in so-called failed–back surgery syndrome. Patients with neuropathic pain of peripheral origin (such as complex regional pain syndrome Type II) also responded well to DBS. Disappointing results were documented in patients with central pain syndromes, such as pain due to spinal cord injury and poststroke pain. Possible reasons for the therapeutic failures are discussed; these include central reorganization and neuroplastic changes of the pain-transmitting pathways and pain modulation centers after brain and spinal cord lesions. Conclusions: The authors found that, in carefully selected patients with chronic pain syndromes, DBS can be helpful and can add to the quality of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chronic pain-associated depression: Antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review
Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1997) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199706000-00006 · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
Neuromodulation for chronic pain
Knotkova, H., Hamani, C., Sivanesan, E., Le Beuffe, M. F. E., Moon, J. Y., Cohen, S. P., & Huntoon, M. A. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00794-7 · Cited by 560
Post Stroke Pain: Identification, Assessment, and Therapy
Harrison, R. A., & Field, T. S. (2015) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000375397 · Cited by 419
An overview of treatment approaches for chronic pain management
Hylands-White, N., Duarte, R. V., & Raphael, J. H. (2017) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-016-3481-8 · Cited by 387
Postamputation pain: epidemiology, mechanisms, and treatment
Cohen, S., & Hsu (2013) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s32299 · Cited by 372
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasche, D., Rinaldi, P. C., Young, R. F., & Tronnier, V. M.
- Venue
- Neurosurgical Focus
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1092-0684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133297111
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/foc.2006.21.6.10
- The paper
- Rasche, D., Rinaldi, P. C., Young, R. F., & Tronnier, V. M. (2006). Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes. Neurosurgical Focus. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2006.21.6.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.