Cited by 53Neurological disorders and treatmentsElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Selective anterior cingulotomy: a psychosurgical evaluation

Brown, M. Hunter, Lighthill, Jack A.·1968·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

In 1937 Papez '1 enunciated the theory that reverberant circuits in the limbic system supplied the mechanism to mediate and express emotional experience. In the years 1947-1951 Fulton' urged neurosurgeons to focus their attention on the anterior cingulum and medial orbital areas as optimum target zones for affective disorders; he pointed out that lesions in either region had no effect on learning disability in monkeys whereas ablations of the prefrontal convexity severely restricted this faculty. In 1958 MacLean s amplified the limbic circuits involved to include the medial forebrain bun~le. Ward 1~ predicted improvement in anancastic behavior from ablation experiments of area 24 in Macacques; he also observed widespread autonomic effects from stimulation of this area, as did Pool and Ransohoff. 1-~ These experimental observations were reinforced by clinical cases of cerebral tumors in the frontal and temporal lobes by Keschner, et al .? and Strauss and Keschner? ~ During the past decade, Malamud 9,1~ has stressed the relationship between psychotic states and the limbic system; recently he reported in detail 18 autopsied cases with limbic tumors. Many of his cases had epileptiform discharges and a clinical picture of schizophrenic or affective psychosis indistinguishable from the purely psychiatric form of these illnesses. These observations led neurosurgeons in various centers of the world to test the effect

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1968.29.5.0513

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anxiety, OCD, and bipolar depression patients are sometimes jointly seen as exhibiting less anxiety, depression, hostility and obsessional thinking post-cingulotomy.

    “Anxiety, OCD, and bipolar depression patients are sometimes jointly seen as exhibiting less anxiety, depression, hostility and obsessional thinking post-cingulotomy (Brown and Lighthill, 1968)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Brown and Lighthill, 1968

  • IQ measures typically remain the same or even slightly improve after anterior cingulotomy.

    “Meanwhile, IQ measures typically remain the same or even slightly improve post-surgery (Ballantine et al., 1967, 1987; Brown and Lighthill, 1968; Cohen et al., 1999a,b; Corkin, 1980; Fedio and Ommaya, 1970; Kim et al., 2003; Steele et al., 2008)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Brown and Lighthill, 1968

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 16 · Cited by 53

Authors
Brown, M. H., & Lighthill, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1968-11
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
513-519
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983972607
Cited by
53
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, psychosurgery, limbic system, mood disorders, medial forebrain bundle, autonomic effects, learning disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review