Selective anterior cingulotomy: a psychosurgical evaluation
Abstract
In 1937 Papez '1 enunciated the theory that reverberant circuits in the limbic system supplied the mechanism to mediate and express emotional experience. In the years 1947-1951 Fulton' urged neurosurgeons to focus their attention on the anterior cingulum and medial orbital areas as optimum target zones for affective disorders; he pointed out that lesions in either region had no effect on learning disability in monkeys whereas ablations of the prefrontal convexity severely restricted this faculty. In 1958 MacLean s amplified the limbic circuits involved to include the medial forebrain bun~le. Ward 1~ predicted improvement in anancastic behavior from ablation experiments of area 24 in Macacques; he also observed widespread autonomic effects from stimulation of this area, as did Pool and Ransohoff. 1-~ These experimental observations were reinforced by clinical cases of cerebral tumors in the frontal and temporal lobes by Keschner, et al .? and Strauss and Keschner? ~ During the past decade, Malamud 9,1~ has stressed the relationship between psychotic states and the limbic system; recently he reported in detail 18 autopsied cases with limbic tumors. Many of his cases had epileptiform discharges and a clinical picture of schizophrenic or affective psychosis indistinguishable from the purely psychiatric form of these illnesses. These observations led neurosurgeons in various centers of the world to test the effect
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety, OCD, and bipolar depression patients are sometimes jointly seen as exhibiting less anxiety, depression, hostility and obsessional thinking post-cingulotomy.
“Anxiety, OCD, and bipolar depression patients are sometimes jointly seen as exhibiting less anxiety, depression, hostility and obsessional thinking post-cingulotomy (Brown and Lighthill, 1968)”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Brown and Lighthill, 1968
IQ measures typically remain the same or even slightly improve after anterior cingulotomy.
“Meanwhile, IQ measures typically remain the same or even slightly improve post-surgery (Ballantine et al., 1967, 1987; Brown and Lighthill, 1968; Cohen et al., 1999a,b; Corkin, 1980; Fedio and Ommaya, 1970; Kim et al., 2003; Steele et al., 2008)”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Brown and Lighthill, 1968
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Brown, M. H., & Lighthill, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1968-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 513-519
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983972607
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- anterior cingulate cortex, psychosurgery, limbic system, mood disorders, medial forebrain bundle, autonomic effects, learning disabilities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review