The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema
Abstract
✓ The authors present the results of an investigation of the vasogenic type of brain edema using cold injury in cats as a model. Their findings indicate that bulk flow and not diffusion should be considered the main mechanism for the spread of edema through the white matter. This conclusion is based on: 1) comparison of the distances actually traveled by various substances during edema spread with those calculated theoretically for migration of the substances by diffusion; 2) coincidence in the speed of movement by two substances (sucrose and albumin) with widely different diffusion coefficients; 3) measurement of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) at various distances from the lesion showing the presence of increased IFP in the lesion area and decreasing pressures along the edema pathway toward the normal tissue; and 4) the fact that spreading of edema can be significantly impeded by inducing before the cold lesion an intracellular type of brain edema that reduces the size of the extracellular space (ECS) and increases the resistance to flow of edema fluid. The pressure-volume curve of the brain ECS, as derived from determinations of IFP and tissue water content, indicates that an initial steep slope in IFP probably represents the high resistance to fluid mobility through the small diameter extracellular channels and the counteracting resistance of the intermingled structures of brain parenchyma to be separated. Once the IFP exceeds these opposing forces, the ECS dilates, fluid mobility increases, and the edema front advances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence
Hladky, S. B., & Barrand, M. A. (2014) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-11-26 · Cited by 633
Molecular pathophysiology of cerebral edema
Stokum, J. A., Gerzanich, V., & Simard, J. M. (2016) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x15617172 · Cited by 587
Cserr, H. F., Harling‐Berg, C. J., & Knopf, P. M. (1992) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00703.x · Cited by 451
Lidar, Z., Mardor, Y., Jonas, T., Pfeffer, R., Faibel, M., Nass, D., Hadani, M., & Ram, Z. (2004) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0472 · Cited by 342
Pharmacokinetics of the Carmustine Implant
Fleming, A. B., & Saltzman, W. M. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241060-00002 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Reulen, H. J., Graham, R., Spatz, M., & Klatzo, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1977-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-35
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017839807
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1977.46.1.0024
- The paper
- Reulen, H. J., Graham, R., Spatz, M., & Klatzo, I. (1977). Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1977.46.1.0024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.