Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a randomized study

Auer, Ludwig M., Deinsberger, Wolfgang, Niederkorn, Kurt, Gell, Günther, Kleinert, Reinhold, Schneider, Gerhard, Holzer, Peter, Bone, Gertraude, Mokry, Michael, Körner, Eva, Kleinert, Gertrude, Hanusch, Susanna·1989·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

✓ A controlled randomized study of endoscopic evacuation versus medical treatment was performed in 100 patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral (subcortical, putaminal, and thalamic) hematomas. Patients with aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, brain tumors, or head injuries were excluded. Criteria for inclusion were as follows: patients' age between 30 and 80 years; a hematoma volume of more than 10 cu cm; the presence of neurological or consciousness impairment; the appropriateness of surgery from a medical and anesthesiological point of view; and the initiation of treatment within 48 hours after hemorrhage. The criteria of randomization were the location, size, and side of the hematoma as well as the patient's age, state of consciousness, and history of hypertension. Evaluation of outcome was performed 6 months after hemorrhage. Surgical patients with subcortical hematomas showed a significantly lower mortality rate (30%) than their medically treated counterparts (70%, p < 0.05). Moreover, 40% of these patients had a good outcome with no or only a minimal deficit versus 25% in the medically treated group; the difference was statistically significant for operated patients with no postoperative deficit (p < 0.01). Surgical patients with hematomas smaller than 50 cu cm made a significantly better functional recovery than did patients of the medically treated group, but had a comparable mortality rate. By contrast, patients with larger hematomas showed significantly lower mortality rates after operation but had no better functional recovery than the medically treated group. This effect from surgery was limited to patients in a preoperatively alert or somnolent state; stuporous or comatose patients had no better outcome after surgery. The outcome of surgical patients with putaminal or thalamic hemorrhage was no better than for those with medical treatment; however, there was a trend toward better quality of survival and chance of survival in the operated group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns.1989.70.4.0530

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Auer, L. M., Deinsberger, W., Niederkorn, K., Gell, G., Kleinert, R., Schneider, G., Holzer, P., Bone, G., Mokry, M., Körner, E., Kleinert, G., & Hanusch, S.
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
1989-04
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
530-535
ISSN
0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106313510
Cited by
640
References
7
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a randomized study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1989.70.4.0530
The paper
Auer, L. M., Deinsberger, W., Niederkorn, K., Gell, G., Kleinert, R., Schneider, G., Holzer, P., Bone, G., Mokry, M., Körner, E., Kleinert, G., & Hanusch, S. (1989). Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a randomized study. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.70.4.0530

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.