The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National survey of patterns of care for brain-tumor patients
Abstract
✓ An excellent response by participating institutions was realized in this survey of patterns of care for patients with primary brain tumors. Since the histopathology of the tumor is such a strong predictor of outcome and influences care so greatly, most analyses were performed not only on the overall series of patients but also by World Health Organization histological classification. Several factors that influence outcome were identified: tumor type, patient age, patient Karnofsky rating, tumor location, and therapy. Very few cases were coded as regards the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage, and few potentially eligible cases were placed in investigative protocols. It behooves those centers providing investigative protocol opportunities to develop liaisons with practicing physicians nearby as well as at some distance and to provide an organizational framework that will make participation in these protocols practical for a larger segment of our brain-tumor patient population. Between 1980 and 1985, the increased use of magnetic resonance imaging in neuroradiology is apparent as well as the increased use of stereotactic biopsy and interstitial radiotherapy. Complications of therapy seem acceptably low. Five-year survival for benign brain tumor is high, while that for the most common primary tumor, glioblastoma multiforme, is only 5.5%. Some of the findings in this survey confirm those from the literature while others, particularly the pattern of care, represent new data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Experimental Therapy of Human Glioma by Means of a Genetically Engineered Virus Mutant
Martuza, R. L., Malick, A., Markert, J. M., Ruffner, K. L., & Coen, D. M. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1851332 · Cited by 1,050
Davis, F. G., Freels, S., Grutsch, J., Barlas, S., & Brem, S. (1998) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0001 · Cited by 482
A GATA4-regulated tumor suppressor network represses formation of malignant human astrocytomas
Agnihotri, S., Wolf, A., Munoz, D. M., Smith, C. J., Gajadhar, A., Restrepo, A., Clarke, I. D., Fuller, G. N., Kesari, S., Dirks, P. B., et al. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20102099 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahaley, M. S., Mettlin, C., Natarajan, N., Laws, E. R., & Peace, B. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 826-836
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013618157
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National survey of patterns of care for brain-tumor patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0826
- The paper
- Mahaley, M. S., Mettlin, C., Natarajan, N., Laws, E. R., & Peace, B. B. (1989). National survey of patterns of care for brain-tumor patients. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.71.6.0826
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.