The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Malignant astrocytomas: focal tumor recurrence after focal external beam radiation therapy
Abstract
✓ Hochberg and Pruitt have reported glioblastomas recurring within 2 cm of the primary site in 90% of patients after whole-brain radiation therapy. They suggested that computerized tomography (CT) scan accuracy would permit smaller radiation fields. A treatment protocol with smaller-field focal brain irradiation following surgical resection is reported. The first 4500 cGy of radiation is focused to within a 3-cm margin around the tumor, with a 1500-cGy boost within a 1.5-cm margin. Forty-two patients with grade III or IV astrocytoma, treated with focal brain radiation therapy were reviewed retrospectively to assess patterns of tumor recurrence. Thirty patients received intra-arterial bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) radiosensitization with focal brain radiation therapy, and 12 patients underwent conventional focal brain radiation therapy. Tumor margin was defined on preoperative and recurrence CT scans as the contrast-enhanced area; these were traced on acetate templates and compared with each other and with the actual scans. In all 42 patients, the lesion recurred within a 2-cm margin of the original tumor. Four patients had two recurrent areas: the second area was within the 2-cm margin in two, and outside this margin in two. These results are similar to those of Hochberg and Pruitt. It is suggested that focal irradiation is now the optimal treatment for malignant astrocytoma. Since recurrences continue to be within the irradiated volumes, it appears that higher focal doses of radiation are appropriate for clinical treatment trials of malignant astrocytomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kioi, M., Vogel, H., Schultz, G., Hoffman, R. M., Harsh, G. R., & Brown, J. M. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci40283 · Cited by 773
Minniti, G., Amelio, D., Amichetti, M., Salvati, M., Muni, R., Bozzao, A., Lanzetta, G., Scarpino, S., Arcella, A., & Enrici, R. M. (2010) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.08.020 · Cited by 323
Lee, S. W., Fraass, B. A., Marsh, L. H., Herbort, K., Gebarski, S. S., Martel, M. K., Radany, E. H., Lichter, A. S., & Sandler, H. M. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00266-1 · Cited by 306
Self-citationIrradiation induces glioblastoma cell senescence and senescence-associated secretory phenotype
Jeon, H.-Y., Kim, J.-K., Ham, S. W., Oh, S.-Y., Kim, J., Park, J.-B., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, S.-C., & Kim, H. (2016) · Tumor Biology · doi:10.1007/s13277-015-4439-2 · Cited by 73
Host effects contributing to cancer therapy resistance.
Katz, O. B., & Shaked, Y. (2015) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2014.12.002 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, B. C., Thornton, A. F., Sandler, H. M., & Greenberg, H. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-563
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154218549
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malignant astrocytomas: focal tumor recurrence after focal external beam radiation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1991.75.4.0559
- The paper
- Liang, B. C., Thornton, A. F., Sandler, H. M., & Greenberg, H. S. (1991). Malignant astrocytomas: focal tumor recurrence after focal external beam radiation therapy. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.4.0559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.