The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas
Abstract
✓ The advent of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has permitted the recognition of many angiographically occult vascular malformations before the development of complications and subsequent surgical removal. This study reviews all patients at one institution who had radiographically identifiable vascular malformations believed to represent cavernous angiomas in order to obtain information on the natural history of this particular lesion. All 8131 craniospinal MR images performed at our medical center from January 1, 1986, to November 30, 1989, were reviewed, and 32 patients were identified with 76 lesions meeting the MR imaging criteria for cavernous angioma. Medical histories, physical examination records, and other data from these patients were then reviewed to determine the frequency of complications. Their mean age at latest follow-up examination (or at surgical removal of the lesion) was 37.6 years (range 16 to 72 years). Sixteen patients (50%) had a history of seizures, seven (22%) had focal neurological deficits, and three (9%) had clinically significant hemorrhage attributable to the cavernous angioma; six patients (19%) were asymptomatic. The estimated risk of hemorrhage for this population is 0.25%/person-year of exposure; the estimated risk of seizure development is 1.51%/person-year. Eight patients underwent surgical procedures, resulting in improved seizure control and/or lessened neurological deficit. Although these lesions are often excised with relative ease and minimal morbidity, the potential risks and benefits of surgery must be weighed carefully before removal of these relatively benign malformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applications of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening
Gorick, C. M., Breza, V. R., Nowak, K. M., Cheng, V. W. T., Fisher, D. G., Debski, A. C., Hoch, M. R., Demir, Z. E. F., Tran, N. M., Schwartz, M. R., et al. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114583 · Cited by 144
Flemming, K. D., Graff-Radford, J., Aakre, J., Kantarci, K., Lanzino, G., Brown, R. D., Mielke, M. M., Roberts, R. O., Kremers, W., Knopman, D. S., et al. (2017) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0439 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Del Curling, O., Kelly, D. L., Elster, A. D., & Craven, T. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 702-708
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167210272
- Cited by
- 828
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.