The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy
Abstract
✓ The long-term outcome of cervical spondylitic myelopathy after surgical treatment was retrospectively reviewed and critically evaluated in 100 patients with documented cervical myelopathy treated between 1978 and 1988 at our institution. Eighty-four patients were available for long-term study. The median duration of follow up was 7.35 years (range 3 to 9.5 years). There were 67 men and 17 women; their ages ranged from 27 to 86 years. The duration of preoperative symptoms ranged from 1 month to 10 years. Preoperative functional grade as evaluated with the Nurick Scale for the group was 2.1. Thirty-three patients with primarily anterior cord compression, one- or two-level disease, or a kyphotic neck deformity were treated by anterior decompression and fusion. Fifty-one patients with primarily posterior cord compression and multiple-level disease were treated by posterior laminectomy. There was no difference in the preoperative functional grade in these two groups. The patients in the posterior treatment group were older (59 vs 55 years). There was no surgical mortality from the operative procedures; morbidity was 3.6%. Of the 33 patients undergoing anterior decompression and fusion, 24 showed immediate functional improvement and nine were unchanged. Of the 51 patients who underwent posterior laminectomy, 35 demonstrated improvement, 11 were unchanged, and five were worse. Six patients, one in the anterior group and five in the posterior group, demonstrated early deterioration. Late deterioration occurred from 2 to 68 months postoperatively. Four (12%) patients who had undergone anterior procedures had additional posterior procedures, and seven (13.7%) patients who had undergone posterior procedures had additional decompressive surgery. The final functional status at last follow-up examination for the 33 patients in the anterior group was improved in 18, unchanged in nine, and deteriorated in six. Of the 51 patients who underwent posterior decompression, 19 benefited from the surgery, 13 were unchanged, and 19 were worse at last follow up than before their initial surgical procedure. Age, severity of disease, number of levels operated, and preoperative grade were not predictive of outcome. The only factor related to potential deterioration was the duration of symptoms preoperatively. The results indicate that with anterior or posterior decompression, long-term outcome is variable, and a subgroup of patients, even after adequate decompression and initial improvement, will have late functional deterioration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Time for a controlled trial
Rowland, L. P. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.1.5 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Sampath, P., Bendebba, M., Davis, J. D., & Ducker, T. B. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200003150-00004 · Cited by 287
Correlation Between Operative Outcomes of Cervical Compression Myelopathy and MRI of the Spinal Cord
Morio, Y., Teshima, R., Nagashima, H., Nawata, K., Yamasaki, D., & Nanjo, Y. (2001) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200106010-00012 · Cited by 261
Suri, A., Chabbra, R. P. S., Mehta, V. S., Gaikwad, S., & Pandey, R. M. (2003) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00448-5 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebersold, M. J., Pare, M. C., & Quast, L. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 745-751
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133991784
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0745
- The paper
- Ebersold, M. J., Pare, M. C., & Quast, L. M. (1995). Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.5.0745
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.